Illinois cuts all funding for autism support

Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

Meistersinger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,700
Location: Beautiful(?) West Manchester Township PA

11 Apr 2015, 8:50 pm

http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/l ... olumn.html

Am I ever glad I left ILLinois in 1991. I though Tom Corbett, former governor of PA was a jerk. Raumer sounds like a sociopath



xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

11 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm

That is awful.

Did they get the idea from this thread?
viewtopic.php?t=279952


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

12 Apr 2015, 1:56 am

xenocity wrote:
That is awful.

Did they get the idea from this thread?
http://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=279952


WHAT??
my thread has nothing to do with autism or canceling funding.

why be mean to me?



xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

12 Apr 2015, 2:52 pm

sly279 wrote:
xenocity wrote:
That is awful.

Did they get the idea from this thread?
viewtopic.php?t=279952


WHAT??
my thread has nothing to do with autism or canceling funding.

why be mean to me?

I'm not being mean.
This is being done in Illinois to get the government out of peoples lives and to provide them more freedom of choice.
The GOP did it to end what they see as the horrible left policies of forcing government on to autistic people.

This is exactly the same thing as your thread is about... Choice!


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

12 Apr 2015, 4:20 pm

xenocity wrote:
sly279 wrote:
xenocity wrote:
That is awful.

Did they get the idea from this thread?
http://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=279952


WHAT??
my thread has nothing to do with autism or canceling funding.

why be mean to me?

I'm not being mean.
This is being done in Illinois to get the government out of peoples lives and to provide them more freedom of choice.
The GOP did it to end what they see as the horrible left policies of forcing government on to autistic people.

This is exactly the same thing as your thread is about... Choice!


except my thread and me don't view providing aid or taxes as bad. see the problem is you see that i disagree on a few subjects then you say I support all the right and support all of the left. this is the fing problem with the left. its all or nothing if if disagree on one thien then f*****g shitstorm on the guy.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

12 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm

The article points out that autism support is being defunded, all the while pensions for retired judges and legislators are going untouched. Obviously, the governor cares more about the political power wielded by those retired functionaries than of that of families with autistic members.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


pezar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,432

12 Apr 2015, 9:27 pm

Illinois is one of the most corrupt states in America. I know of places, mostly smaller towns, in other states that are extremely corrupt. But the ENTIRE political establishment in IL, from the guv on down, is rotten. That's unique, although I should note that Kitzhaber in Oregon got tangled up in a corruption scandal, but the difference is that the good folks of OR forced Kitzhaber out, while Raumer stays in office. That article notes that IL's pension system has made promises of payouts that it can not keep, but the state employees unions are too powerful, so the guv has to make little cuts like this one. He can't tackle the real problem, even if he wanted to he couldn't.

It will likely get to a point similar to Argentina, where people pay taxes/bribes and get nothing in return. The govt in Argentina holds little power in Buenos Aires and none outside of it, but it still collects taxes and bribes, only the taxes/bribes go into the pockets of Cristina Kirchner and her lackeys. The police exist to insulate the elite from the rage of the poor and from the consequences of the elite's bad decisions. Buenos Aires has large areas where there is no law at all. The rich hire private guards, who are paid and fed well. Everybody else is left to rot.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

13 Apr 2015, 2:51 am

pezar wrote:
Illinois is one of the most corrupt states in America. I know of places, mostly smaller towns, in other states that are extremely corrupt. But the ENTIRE political establishment in IL, from the guv on down, is rotten. That's unique, although I should note that Kitzhaber in Oregon got tangled up in a corruption scandal, but the difference is that the good folks of OR forced Kitzhaber out, while Raumer stays in office. That article notes that IL's pension system has made promises of payouts that it can not keep, but the state employees unions are too powerful, so the guv has to make little cuts like this one. He can't tackle the real problem, even if he wanted to he couldn't.

It will likely get to a point similar to Argentina, where people pay taxes/bribes and get nothing in return. The govt in Argentina holds little power in Buenos Aires and none outside of it, but it still collects taxes and bribes, only the taxes/bribes go into the pockets of Cristina Kirchner and her lackeys. The police exist to insulate the elite from the rage of the poor and from the consequences of the elite's bad decisions. Buenos Aires has large areas where there is no law at all. The rich hire private guards, who are paid and fed well. Everybody else is left to rot.


didn't force him out he left after completing his task. we knew all about his scandal pre election. but the dems and media hushed it up so he could get elected and then resign so Kate Brown a dem could be appointed. if not the republican would likely have won. it was a super close election. the whole thing was just about ensuring a dem as governor since the alternative wasn't super high odds of getting one elected. I think it should have gone to special election or that the runner up should get it instead we have a governor that wasn't elected by the people. what if in 2016 a person ran for election won then a week later resigned allowing is vp to be president then it comes out he never planned to serve as president. upsetting.

the left praised and defended him through the elections then after joined the right to condemn him. all just to ensure a republican didn't get elected. after all better to elect a known corrupt democrat then a republican right?

as for Illinois, what do you expect from such a corrupt horrible state. they wanted to ban bolt action hunting rifles year ago.