AspieUtah wrote:
As convincing as anecdotal evidence from a blog can be, I chose to stick with federal statistical evidence.
Convincing of what? The officer who started the thread is complaining about illegitimate police calls, not crime statistics. You are looking at completely irrelevant data sets if you are trying to verify what the actual thread is about.
Quote:
So, if people report (or exaggerate) witnessed crimes based on the race of the alleged criminals, it might be because they are aware that the facts confirm their presumptions most of the time. I agree that it is wrong, but it is accurate.
What the hell is wrong with you? You are saying that it's accurate for people to exaggerate the crimes they witness? Surely you must know that the average person is not aware of these statistics (particularly since you yourself had to look them up) and are therefore extremely unlikely to be calling the police based on them. An "accurate" decision to call the police is based on a legitimate threat in the particular instance in question, not statistics.
Furthermore, all this crap you've posted is irrelevant to this thread because the reddit discussion is about people calling the cops on people who were doing clearly benign things. It was determined that no crimes had been committed, and, in many of the cases, the people calling them in couldn't even cite any criminal activity. Did you even read what was linked?
Also, knowing certain people does not prove that you are not a racist. Learn some damned reasoning skills.