naturalplastic wrote:
So what exactly is your point?
We obviously learned nothing from the Vietnam debacle.
We cannot win a "counter insurgency" war with our gigantic, overly complex military and weapons. Are we in Afghanistan to rid the country of Taliban, all Qaeda and ISIS? Or are we there because Afghan troops couldn't be trained in 14 years by over 100,000 troops, so it makes sense for fewer troops to train them for the next couple of years?
Most of these counter insurgency wars are, in fact, civil wars and historically, outside powers involving themselves in internal conflicts have ended tragically.
As Robert Fisk pointed out some time ago, the Afghans have now defeated the British, the USSR, and the Americans.
And my final point, I think he should return the Nobel Peace Prize now. It's only fair.