izzeme wrote:
If anyone breaking in expects the victims to be armed, they are more likely to actually shoot.
Arming civilians leads to an arms race between police, criminals and civilians; it's only a matter of time before flamethrowers or RPGs are used.
If a group of criminals are breaking in to rob another group of criminals (to relieve them of their ill gotten gains) the "shooting" scenario you describe is likely. If a group of criminals are breaking in to rob innocent homeowners then your statement makes no sense as any criminal will simply go somewhere there are no guns.
It sounds like you are advocating against arms usage to protect your home. Although your choice is "your choice" it sounds as though you're advocating a cowardly response to a threat. Would you suggest you lie down on your belly and tell them where the kids sleep so they can do their dirty business and leave quickly (so as not to "upset" your evening)? Because if you have no form of defense this is
exactly what you are doing.
Try to think of arms usage in the same manner you think of using a seat belt: It's a pain in the ass 99% of the time, but when you need it you'll be happy you have it. It could save your life or your family's life........
If used properly. Better start practicing.