All You Americans Are Fired
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jessicagarrison ... -are-fired
A great piece of journalism from Buzzfeed of all places that basically completely debunks the theory that Americans are unwilling to do these unskilled labor when in reality these companies just want modern day slaves. They are not only denying Americans jobs but they are exploiting bordering on enslaving these foreign workers. This "legal" immigration is an even bigger problem than those illegals that cross our border on foot, many of these workers just walk off these jobs too and good many of illegals have entered the country this way off work visas. The whole system needs to be redone, it should done with the interests of the American worker first and foremost. Maybe it is worth it to pay a little more for produce? It doesn't even really cost them less to hire these foreigners, it's just that they whip them into being twice as productive. This madness needs to stop.
Some truth to a lot of it. I have known people who picked fruit, who told of children who were better pickers than them. It did take a month or more to come up to speed. When someone is paying by the hour, they want everyone working at the same speed.
When they used to pay by the box or bin it evened out, but I think piece work has become illegal.
Families used to come, everybody worked together. By the hour, only adult men are worth it.
The pickers I knew worked as a group, and worked smaller farms. Both they and the farmer looked forward to next year. It was several families that travelled together.
This is different, a big field has a short life, picking everything at its peak, takes a lot of hands for a short time.
Taking trainees for the hardest work they ever did, at a pace that does not quit, most of the workers will. Matched with a Mexican that grew up doing field work for much less money, unless you are in top shape you will not last a day.
I know one hyper worker, I hired him for some yard work, something I did myself, and he worked me into the ground, and he did most of it. I met his other employer who told me he put new workers with him, to see if they could hang, and the children of his friends, their first job, where they worked from morning till night, and every job they had after that was easy. We do not have a culture of work like that. Mexicans do.
I can pick up a bale of hay, but bucking hay from a field, loading the new baled onto a flatbed, stacked eight high, is a whole other form of work. It has to be stacked in the barn before it rains, so it is dawn to dusk every day till it is done.
If we are going to get the job done, we do need Mexicans. For $75 a day they will do a lot of work, and be back tomorrow morning at dawn. In Mexico that is two weeks pay. Americans can stand around inside for $60 a day.
Besides the visas, Mexicans will stay as long as the money is right, Americans will make some money and leave. When the crop has to be harvested, Mexicans are the way to do it.
There are a lot of smaller growers that do just hire local, if someone wants to work they can find a job.
There is some truth to all of this.
I'm sure just straight up chattel slavery would be even more productive and efficient, these migrants are being taken advantage of as modern day slaves and Americans are being denied jobs. I do not care if the cost of labor goes up, it should, maybe wages wouldn't be so stagnant if we weren't bringing in millions of third worlders into unskilled and now even skilled(H1b) workers and they actually paid a fair living wage. If we have to pay more for produce then we have to pay more for produce, we will be fine, we will survive, people will be better off if they are actually working for a living. This whole "no Americans will do these jobs" narrative is just a complete lie, these companies go thru extraordinary lengths to hire their foreign slave workers.
When they used to pay by the box or bin it evened out, but I think piece work has become illegal.
Families used to come, everybody worked together. By the hour, only adult men are worth it.
The pickers I knew worked as a group, and worked smaller farms. Both they and the farmer looked forward to next year. It was several families that travelled together.
This is different, a big field has a short life, picking everything at its peak, takes a lot of hands for a short time.
Taking trainees for the hardest work they ever did, at a pace that does not quit, most of the workers will. Matched with a Mexican that grew up doing field work for much less money, unless you are in top shape you will not last a day.
I know one hyper worker, I hired him for some yard work, something I did myself, and he worked me into the ground, and he did most of it. I met his other employer who told me he put new workers with him, to see if they could hang, and the children of his friends, their first job, where they worked from morning till night, and every job they had after that was easy. We do not have a culture of work like that. Mexicans do.
I can pick up a bale of hay, but bucking hay from a field, loading the new baled onto a flatbed, stacked eight high, is a whole other form of work. It has to be stacked in the barn before it rains, so it is dawn to dusk every day till it is done.
If we are going to get the job done, we do need Mexicans. For $75 a day they will do a lot of work, and be back tomorrow morning at dawn. In Mexico that is two weeks pay. Americans can stand around inside for $60 a day.
Besides the visas, Mexicans will stay as long as the money is right, Americans will make some money and leave. When the crop has to be harvested, Mexicans are the way to do it.
There are a lot of smaller growers that do just hire local, if someone wants to work they can find a job.
There is some truth to all of this.
You mentioned: "If we are going to get the job done, we do need Mexicans." ?????
That's a lot of picking for between 12 million and 20 million estimated illegal aliens in this country, don't you think?
The truth is almost ALL of the illegal aliens in this country have nothing to do with "picking." Instead they work at other jobs (truck drivers, constructions workers, you-name-it) where Americans, hired by both individuals and companies, would be paid more, with health, vacation, and other benefits. Corporations and rich families, that like servants at low cost, support the illegal/CRIMINAL activities and put United States citizens out of work. The corporations especially like this because this system makes the worker a criminal and easier to control, all this with the blessing of which ever political party is in power.
Why, exactly, is it that US private employers should somehow be obliged to favor domestic-born employees?
The entire "immigrants are taking our jobs" angle assumes that US citizens somehow "own" the job openings that private companies decide to make available.
But they are private companies, founded by, owned by and run by private individuals. It's their businesses and their money.
The notion that someone is more "deserving" of a job simply because he or she - through no achievement of his/her own - was born in a country is more shallow than the flimsiest of affirmative action arguments (even if you include the 27 percent chance of having to serve on a jury), and it flies in the face of the notion of hiring the best individual for the job.
I would - grudgingly - accept that a public employer could be instructed to offer (extremely limited) preferential treatment in employment for individuals who had been conscripted to serve in the armed forces, as his/her citizenship would actually involve a duty to do something serious for his/her country. But since no one has been drafted in the US since 1973, that's a rather moot point.
And even then, it would probably have to be an active combat role.
The entire "immigrants are taking our jobs" angle assumes that US citizens somehow "own" the job openings that private companies decide to make available.
But they are private companies, founded by, owned by and run by private individuals. It's their businesses and their money.
The notion that someone is more "deserving" of a job simply because he or she - through no achievement of his/her own - was born in a country is more shallow than the flimsiest of affirmative action arguments (even if you include the 27 percent chance of having to serve on a jury), and it flies in the face of the notion of hiring the best individual for the job.
I would - grudgingly - accept that a public employer could be instructed to offer (extremely limited) preferential treatment in employment for individuals who had been conscripted to serve in the armed forces, as his/her citizenship would actually involve a duty to do something serious for his/her country. But since no one has been drafted in the US since 1973, that's a rather moot point.
And even then, it would probably have to be an active combat role.

Did you read the story? These companies are deliberately skirting US law and our government allows it because it falls in line with the interests of big business. There is no shortage of labor, it is a complete scam. These migrant workers are exploited, employers prefer them because of the additional leverage they have over them so they're essentially slaves. You tend to work hard when if you employer can have you deported, you work even harder with a gun pointed to your back.
100% we have the right to dictate our own immigration policies and it should fit the interests of the American people, anything else is treachery. This is in line with American values, this is what makes a country. People that support open borders support the destruction of western civilization, globalists who want to bring about a new world order. They want to depress wages, they want to impoverish us, they want to enslave us.
A lot of these work programs need to be scraped or at least have much stricter regulation and enforcement, immigration must be metered or else the United States as we know it will not exist 50 years from now. Yeah times change but change isn't always for the better, how do you feel about secession and civil war? Obviously our government is concerned with the possibility considering the breakneck pace they've set expanding the police state. They run drills against the American people all the time now, martial law won't come with a big announcement but rather will come incrementally so we don't notice like boiling a frog.
Nobody has a right to immigrate to this country, we do not owe you a better life, we as Americans should start focusing on our own suffering people but again that is exactly where they want us to be.
GoonSquad
Veteran
Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...
BS. Americans will not do manual agriculture related jobs.
I used to work for a company in Georgia that grew/processed/packaged vidalia onions. Sure, you could get Americans to work in packaging--putting onions in bags or boxes, but that's about it.
One year at harvest time ICE scared off our field crew. The owners were so despirate the get the onions out of the field that they were offering $15/hr (in 1998). Lots of people tried, but most walked off the job within the first hour and NOBODY lasted a day.
_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus
Sure nobody is owed a job, but we need them just the same. Companies have used h1b visas to hire cheaper workers over our highly skilled workers. Nobody wants to earn a degree in computer science only to get passed over for someone cheaper. Right or wrong, I vote against this practice.
_________________
I'm a math evangelist, I believe in theorems and ignore the proofs.
So, in other words, deportation relief - or even better, a pathway to citizenship - would drastically improve the bargaining power of illegal immigrants vis a vis employers and thus prevent exploitation. Got it.
... So, why is it that you support Trump - who will give employers even *more* leverage - again?
A lot of these work programs need to be scraped or at least have much stricter regulation and enforcement, immigration must be metered or else the United States as we know it will not exist 50 years from now. Yeah times change but change isn't always for the better, how do you feel about secession and civil war? Obviously our government is concerned with the possibility considering the breakneck pace they've set expanding the police state. They run drills against the American people all the time now, martial law won't come with a big announcement but rather will come incrementally so we don't notice like boiling a frog.
Thanks for the update. My NWO contact in the Rothschild family forgot to send me the summary from the last Bilderberg meeting, so I was out of the loop for a moment there.
You still haven't explained why private companies are obliged to offer you preferential treatment just because you are a US citizen. They do not owe *you* a better life, either.
It's a silly dishonest argument you are making, it's not as if you believe that government should not involve itself in the economy but rather just that it shouldn't protect American workers so why is that? I just don't understand. My allegiance is to the United States of America, not Mexico or the Philippines or Bangladesh. If our government does not want to do what is in the interests of the American people than that government is tyrannical and should be overthrown. It is not a level playing field, Americans cannot compete with foreign workers because the entire point of their importation is to undercut us with less pay, less benefits, brutal work conditions, and no way of recourse. They don't want workers, they want slaves.
Illegals must never receive amnesty and need to go home, legal immigration must be metered, children of non-citizens should revert to citizenship of their parents. This is the way most of the planet is so why can't we do the same? It is our right to decide our immigration policy, we don't have to bend the will of the corporate moneyed interests. This is how democracy is suppose to work right?
Well, the US is currently facing a labor shortage (quite literally, as the number of job openings exceeds the number of hires for the first time in a decade.)

Source - Bureau of Labor Statistics (October 2015): http://www.bls.gov/web/jolts/jlt_labstatgraphs.pdf (see page 6)
So I'll reserve the right to be somewhat sceptical about the risk of getting passed over.
Oh, and as for the "our highly skilled workers" part.

In 2013, the US came in third last among OECD countries in math skills, crucial for the STEM fields in particular.
Source - OECD: http://skills.oecd.org/documents/OECD_S ... k_2013.pdf (page 84)
Perhaps some immigrants are hired instead of US citizens not because they are cheaper, but because they are more qualified for the job. Perish the thought.
When they used to pay by the box or bin it evened out, but I think piece work has become illegal.
Families used to come, everybody worked together. By the hour, only adult men are worth it.
The pickers I knew worked as a group, and worked smaller farms. Both they and the farmer looked forward to next year. It was several families that travelled together.
This is different, a big field has a short life, picking everything at its peak, takes a lot of hands for a short time.
Taking trainees for the hardest work they ever did, at a pace that does not quit, most of the workers will. Matched with a Mexican that grew up doing field work for much less money, unless you are in top shape you will not last a day.
I know one hyper worker, I hired him for some yard work, something I did myself, and he worked me into the ground, and he did most of it. I met his other employer who told me he put new workers with him, to see if they could hang, and the children of his friends, their first job, where they worked from morning till night, and every job they had after that was easy. We do not have a culture of work like that. Mexicans do.
I can pick up a bale of hay, but bucking hay from a field, loading the new baled onto a flatbed, stacked eight high, is a whole other form of work. It has to be stacked in the barn before it rains, so it is dawn to dusk every day till it is done.
If we are going to get the job done, we do need Mexicans. For $75 a day they will do a lot of work, and be back tomorrow morning at dawn. In Mexico that is two weeks pay. Americans can stand around inside for $60 a day.
Besides the visas, Mexicans will stay as long as the money is right, Americans will make some money and leave. When the crop has to be harvested, Mexicans are the way to do it.
There are a lot of smaller growers that do just hire local, if someone wants to work they can find a job.
There is some truth to all of this.
You mentioned: "If we are going to get the job done, we do need Mexicans." ?????
That's a lot of picking for between 12 million and 20 million estimated illegal aliens in this country, don't you think?
The truth is almost ALL of the illegal aliens in this country have nothing to do with "picking." Instead they work at other jobs (truck drivers, constructions workers, you-name-it) where Americans, hired by both individuals and companies, would be paid more, with health, vacation, and other benefits. Corporations and rich families, that like servants at low cost, support the illegal/CRIMINAL activities and put United States citizens out of work. The corporations especially like this because this system makes the worker a criminal and easier to control, all this with the blessing of which ever political party is in power.
I was speaking of legal guest workers. They are here for one job, one employer.
They do work that is very hard that even if Americans wanted the job, few are in condition to do it.
If they are, Americans can find work in construction at twice the wages.
Some illegals do casual labor, but a lot are educated, skilled, and do take American jobs.
We do have to control the border, but most of the educated come in as tourists and just stay.
Criminals cross the border at night, they are avoiding the Mexican Police. A wall would help.
This group does most of the crime.
Illegal workers come over for shopping, then pack fifteen into a van and are six hundred miles away by the next morning.
We are not going to stop all tourists or shoppers, they bring in a lot of money. Some overstay. We need to get better at tracking them down and sending them back, it should not take a Federal Judge to say, overstayed Visa, dump back over the border and bar from reentering. Your ticket to Disneyworld has expired, you have to leave.
Mexico will put you in jail for two years for an expired visa.
Having a better legal guest worker program, like we used to, will cut down on the illegal.
Some add to our economy, educated, skilled, but no visa.
Some take jobs that Americans could do, and do drive down jobs and wages.
Some continue their life of rape, robbery, murder, drug running, then clog our Courts and Prisons.
This last group should go first, be blocked most, because they do the most damage.
A Legal Program brings in people who have names, health screening, background checks.
It is not on them to make the situation better, it is our job to bring order to our country.
The entire "immigrants are taking our jobs" angle assumes that US citizens somehow "own" the job openings that private companies decide to make available.
But they are private companies, founded by, owned by and run by private individuals. It's their businesses and their money.
The notion that someone is more "deserving" of a job simply because he or she - through no achievement of his/her own - was born in a country is more shallow than the flimsiest of affirmative action arguments (even if you include the 27 percent chance of having to serve on a jury), and it flies in the face of the notion of hiring the best individual for the job.
Open borders fanatics like GGPViper constantly use this sort of rhetoric, basically demanding to know why their opponents feel "entitled" to live in a country run for the collective benefit of its citizens - as if anybody has to justify that to someone like him.

In 2013, the US came in third last among OECD countries in math skills, crucial for the STEM fields in particular.
Source - OECD: http://skills.oecd.org/documents/OECD_S ... k_2013.pdf (page 84)
Perhaps some immigrants are hired instead of US citizens not because they are cheaper, but because they are more qualified for the job. Perish the thought.
The link also explains that the US is the country with the widest gap between the lowest and highest performers. Even ignoring this fact, the fact that the US came in third last among OECD in basic numeracy still does not imply there is a STEM shortage. I think it's safe to say the relatively poor level of numeracy in the US has much to do with the number of Third Worlders who have been pouring into the US for the past few decades.
No, wait, actually you're right. The country that put a man on the moon clearly cannot survive without opening its borders to scientific and economic powerhouses like Mexico. Please continue to post more of your colourful graphs mr. scientist, we're all just so, so impressed by them, LOL.
Hey Jacoby, you might want to continue debating statistics with GGPViper, and I know that being a conservative you want to treat everyone as an individual, but here's a hint for you regarding GGPViper's motivations: he's anti-White.
Just because the average test score lags other countries doesn't mean we don't have highly skilled workers, that's really condescending of you. This is a better known example of our tech workers losing jobs to h1b workers.
_________________
I'm a math evangelist, I believe in theorems and ignore the proofs.

