Jacoby wrote:
Scott Walker isn't as bad as Ted Cruz, I think we should all be grateful that great rat of Texas has been vanquished however. Hillary is such a bad candidate that she might of actually gave that freak a chance at winning.
If for sake of convenience, if you roughly divide the Republican party into Teabaggers, "Establishment" Republicans, NeoCons, and RINOs, the only Republicans with any actual enthusiasm for Trump would probably be the RINOs. The remaining Republicans will probably only make the effort to vote in order to vote against Hillary or to vote for their preferred congressional candidates. In fact, some may even vote for Hillary.
So how does replacing Trump with Walker or Cruz in the current election affect the math? This is a serious (not leading) question.