Pence "winner" of VP debate that hadn't yet happened.

Post Reply New Topic

There are no words..

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politic ... -1.2817783

I would call them both winners, for acting infinitely more presidential than the presidential candidates.

You may have a point there..

seems like they knew the future

Republicans are clairvoyants?

At least in this instance it seems to have worked out for them.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day

It was not about clairvoyance but public relations ie setting the agenda in advance.

The Republicans don't need to have the actual event; to them all that matters is the spin anyway.

lol as if Democrats are not the masters of spin with the media doing their bidding

Well...

Why not?

We all know that Hillary has been "fighting ISIS for her whole adult life". She turned 21 around 1969, and ISIS didn't exist until around 2011, so if Hillary can violate the laws of physics and time travel more than four decades into the future..then why cant the RNC time travel only 12 hours into the future?

Clinton does have more issues with time, (she claimed to have been named after New Zealander Sir Edmund Hillary, which is unlikely as she was born in the 1940s, before he became the first climber to the top of Mt Everest in the 1950s) while the Donald appears to have more issues with truth, according to the fact checkers.

how about the mod that edited my post there show themselves, i don't appreciate anonymous lecturing

It's not a fallacy in my opinion to point out when someone's argument about another candidate doesn't pass their own smell test, we're not arguing about whether or not something is good or bad or okay to do but rather who is more or less guilty of whatever and who is better between the two candidates so comparison between the two is ALWAYS apt and if you can't defend your end then you are probably wrong. It's so funny, it's so easy for me to defend Trump and deflect the nonsense that I think it really frustrates some people since nobody here has the huevos to defend the Bill and Hillary Clinton. "I don't like Hillary either but I'm going to vote for her and raise a fit about Donald Trump every other post but don't accuse me of supporting Hillary", like really? That is derailing, that is intellectual cowardice, these people have no interest in any discussion at all and I discuss more than anybody. Crybaby whiners is all they are, answer the post or shut up is my opinion because this isn't your blog or facebook feed and if you don't want to discuss then why are here to begin with? If you can't stop yourself from shaking with rage when you read PPR then I suggest you quit reading it for your own health, you'll probably go bald if you keep it up. This is not your safe space, sorry.

If you are insinuating that I am editing your comments in this thread, that is a completely baseless and fallacious claim.
Please withdraw the insinuation. It is a personal attack.

You're not even a mod are you? No, I did not say you edited my post. I have a pretty decent idea of who did it and if he has something he wants to discuss with me then he should talk to me directly. I don't like looking back at a post and to see somebody added their own commentary on it without even attaching their screen name .

You're not even a mod are you?

I'm not? Most long term members know that I became a mod over a year ago, and AFAIK, I still am. There is a list of mod names in the forum elsewhere and my name still appears there.