Why do social services take children away from parents who are NOT abusing or neglecting their children in any way, and have nothing to hide at all, but people like the parents of Baby P got away scot-free with abusing him until he died?
I mean, a child pulls a muscle in his leg, the worried parent takes him to the doctor, then a few days later they get social services knocking at their door and asking the parents a bunch of questions about their child's accident, and all of a sudden the children are took away, leaving the parents devastated and the children frightened.
It's what I read about in magazines a lot, and it sickens me. In the end, the parents fight to get their children back, and often they do win. But Baby P got health visitors coming, and they saw all the bruises and other injuries on his body, and they believed the parents when they said the baby was accident-prone. But genuine parents with accident-prone children get overlooked and accused of abusing their children.
Why is this?
_________________
Female