Page 1 of 7 [ 103 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 8:08 pm

They are not America's best. They are sexist. They are Xenophobes. They are racists. And some, I assume, are decent people...

All kidding aside, Hillary was right that Trump has both drawn support from and raised the hopes of some of Americas worst. We know that some Trump supporters are perfectly decent Americans who don't espouse these heinous views, but there are those others and I will be using this thread to look at what makes them so very deplorable.

First look under the lid of the basket, and what do we find, is that a centipede? A woodlouse? A bloodworm? Silverfish? No! It's........

Racist Charles Wasko, just resigned Mayor of West York, PA.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37694347
Image

Quote:
In June he uploaded a photo of orangutans in a wheelbarrow, captioned: "Aww... moving day at the Whitehouse has finally arrived."
"Not soon enough!" Mr Wasko commented on the image, which had the phrase "Kenya or bust" superimposed on the hand cart.
But in an interview this month with Pennsylvania TV station WHTM, Mr Wasko said: "The racist stuff, yeah. I'll admit I did that, and I don't care what people label me as."
Much of his Facebook activity has also targeted Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential candidate, or expressed support for Republican candidate Donald Trump.


And what's that, scuttling behind the Norwegian Rat?

On the same BBC page with the piece on nasty ex-mayor fron PA, there is a video interview with white supremacist Richard Spencer, quoted by the BBC as saying, "Donald Trump's arrow is pointing in our direction." Please take a look at the whole deplorable interview at the URL above.


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

18 Oct 2016, 8:16 pm

While I appreciate your concern, don't you feel as a moderator enforcing a political bias and declaring a voter demographic as misguided or deplorable is against the very PPR rules?

I get it. Passions runs high in the election period, but Walrus by comparison is a lot more balanced in his posting.

EDIT: Edited one word.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


Last edited by TheSpectrum on 18 Oct 2016, 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

18 Oct 2016, 8:21 pm

To quote the amazing TallyMan from the PPR rules:

TallyMan wrote:
Other groups of people.

While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism.

Because people do not follow your mantra and political leaning it does not make them as a whole or in part misguided or deplorable. There are some bad people in the world but you shouldn't associate all their behaviour onto another innocent person or dismiss them as misguided if they don't fit the narrative you are trying to describe for that subset of people.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 37
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

18 Oct 2016, 8:34 pm

Moderator mod thyself.

Quote:
And some, I assume, are decent people...


He might have covered his behind there, but I suspect if I said something similar about Clinton supporters or "The Left" I would quickly get a flipper to the face from The_Walrus.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 8:37 pm

TheSpectrum wrote:
While I appreciate your concern, don't you feel as a moderator enforcing a political bias and comparing a voter demographic as misguided or deplorable is against the very PPR rules?

I get it. Passions runs high in the election period, but Walrus by comparison is a lot more balanced in his posting.


I suspect that by "balanced" you mean Walrus is a bit to the political right of my views?

In any case, let's be transparent and frank.

First, I am not enforcing a political bias. You and anyone else is free to post your own political thoughts here.

Have you seen the posts from Dox, Jacoby, Nurseangela and Mikah, for example? If I were "enforcing a political bias" you wouldn't.

Instead you see me posting my own stuff and sometimes trying to rebut the things posted from the right. This is called expression and dialogue, not "enforcing."

Second, I am under no obligation to pretend to be balanced in my political views. Perhaps you misread the site guidelines or PPR rules?

For your reference, the rules: viewtopic.php?t=73837
PPR Guidelines: viewtopic.php?t=204613
You may also be interested in site owner Alex Plank's views on the election: http://wrongplanet.net/important-electi ... -autistic/

I am not just a moderator, but also a member and I can post as such. When I am moderating, I will put a tag in front of the comments like this [moderating]
[not moderating]

When acting as a moderator, I will do my best not to let my partisan political passions influence any decisions that I have to make. If you feel that some decision I made as a moderator was unfairly influenced by partisan considerations, you can have a chat with me about it in PMs or complain to the other mods.

Moderation is mostly not about partisan issues, though. It's about the rules. Don't make personal attacks or attack protected groups, don't spam or post obscenity and you should be fine.

When I post in my role as WrongPlanet member rather than moderator, I will not be pretending to have views I don't.

I hope that clears things up for you. If not, please feel free to PM or start a thread in the WrongPlanet forum about this issue. :D


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

18 Oct 2016, 8:39 pm

TheSpectrum wrote:
Because people do not follow your mantra and political leaning it does not make them as a whole or in part misguided or deplorable. There are some bad people in the world but you shouldn't associate all their behaviour onto another innocent person or dismiss them as misguided if they don't fit the narrative you are trying to describe for that subset of people.

Indeed. For the vast and larger part of Americans, the only electoral involvement that they enjoy apart from voting itself is to mimic the griping and kvetching taught to them by the various campaigns and the news-media camp followers. These Americans have been slowly recruited into the sport-ified world of 21st century politics where idiocracy and "the team" rules.

And, they don't even see how they have been played.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Last edited by AspieUtah on 18 Oct 2016, 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

18 Oct 2016, 8:41 pm

No, they're still very much going against the groups of people rule.
They're saying the good ones are misguided and the bad ones are deplorable.

Walrus also points out that during this period people aren't following it.
Check the top stickies.

I'm not saying you have to believe anything but what you believe in but you are clearly going against the rule in the sticky. Even your first sentence is a "joking not joking" thing.
It has nothing to do with where Walrus sits on the political scale. While I can't speak for him he is very much not supportive of a lot of the conservative views in this forum, but he is at least fair and doesn't step over that boundary.

You stepped over it with this thread.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 8:51 pm

Mikah wrote:
Moderator mod thyself.

Quote:
And some, I assume, are decent people...


He might have covered his behind there, but I suspect if I said something similar about Clinton supporters or "The Left" I would quickly get a flipper to the face from The_Walrus.


Well, no. That was an attempt at humor. In using the word "Deplorable" I am referencing Hillary Clinton's remarks about the nastier part of Trump's fan base. In using the "Some I assume are decent people" I am referencing Donald Trump's remarks about Mexicans.

The people I am calling deplorable are white supremacists, racists and the kind of sexist who comes up with a phrase like the one on the T-shirt at this link: https://twitter.com/sallykohn/status/78 ... 76/photo/1
I can't post the image because it would violate WP content rules.

To be clear, this thread is not about Trump fans in general, Republicans in general or right wing people in general.

It is about those white supremacists, racists, religious extremists and sexists whose views are deplorable. These are people like Richard Spencer, whose views it is against guidelines to post here.


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

18 Oct 2016, 8:52 pm

Guilt by non-association

Who cares what some dumb guy joked about on Facebook?

Do leftists want their jokes policed?

see how easy it is for you to hate your fellow Americans, you have dehumanized Trump supporters and speak in eliminationist terms



TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

18 Oct 2016, 8:57 pm

Adamantium wrote:
To be clear, this thread is not about Trump fans in general, Republicans in general or right wing people in general.

Even if you excuse that...

"We know that some Trump supporters are perfectly decent Americans who are just sadly misguided this year"

You've made a foregone conclusion that many people here are therefore misguided, and regardless of whether you post as a member having someone make that statement with moderator in their name can be quite off-putting for people looking to have political discussion here that does not fit the moderation team's views. Add to that, the PPR rule about Groups of People.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 8:59 pm

TheSpectrum wrote:
Because people do not follow your mantra and political leaning it does not make them as a whole or in part misguided or deplorable. There are some bad people in the world but you shouldn't associate all their behaviour onto another innocent person or dismiss them as misguided if they don't fit the narrative you are trying to describe for that subset of people.

I think you are making stuff up here. Nowhere have I said that people who don't agree with my politics are deplorable

If you look at the people I have actually called deplorable, Charles Wasko and Richard Spencer, they are public figures who have chosen to support Trump who make extreme racist statements.

If you can find any language where I suggest that all people who support Trump or are on the political right are deplorable or associated with these particularly nasty Trump supporters, I will happily remove that language because it was certainly not my intent to communicate that idea.

Your "Sadly misguided" point is taken.

But if you want me to say that Charles Wasko's posts about Obama or Richard Spencer's and his European Identity drive for more pivilege for whites is not deplorable, there we will have to disagree.


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

18 Oct 2016, 9:03 pm

Adamantium wrote:
TheSpectrum wrote:
Because people do not follow your mantra and political leaning it does not make them as a whole or in part misguided or deplorable. There are some bad people in the world but you shouldn't associate all their behaviour onto another innocent person or dismiss them as misguided if they don't fit the narrative you are trying to describe for that subset of people.

I think you are making stuff up here. Nowhere have I said that people who don't agree with my politics are deplorable
Why are you back peddling to these first couple of remarks?

Adamantium wrote:
If you look at the people I have actually called deplorable, Charles Wasko and Richard Spencer, they are public figures who have chosen to support Trump who make extreme racist statements.
And I wouldn't disagree. You'll be happy to know Charles Wasko has quit.

Adamantium wrote:
If you can find any language where I suggest that all people who support Trump or are on the political right are deplorable or associated with these particularly nasty Trump supporters, I will happily remove that language because it was certainly not my intent to communicate that idea.

Your "Sadly misguided" point is taken.
Thank you.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 9:04 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Guilt by non-association

Who cares what some dumb guy joked about on Facebook?

Do leftists want their jokes policed?

see how easy it is for you to hate your fellow Americans, you have dehumanized Trump supporters and speak in eliminationist terms


It would seem a lot of people cared. Enough people to have a bunch of public meetings after which he resigned. Enough people that the BBC heard about it and sent someone to report on it.


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 9:09 pm

TheSpectrum wrote:
Why are you back peddling to these first couple of remarks?

It takes me a while to think and type, so I respond to one thing, and then another.

Quote:
I wouldn't disagree. You'll be happy to know Charles Wasko has quit.

Yes, that's why I called him the ex-mayor. Seems like a good thing for the town.

Quote:
Thank you.

You're welcome.


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 9:20 pm

On the sexist/Misogynist front, have a look if you can stomach it--t-shirts and posters revealing a view of women, along with an appreciation of Clinton.
http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/10/the-mos ... llies.html


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

18 Oct 2016, 9:36 pm

An uncensored look at some of the views expressed at Trump rallies from the New York Times

The Times called out three phrases in type below the video:

Kill her!

Trump that b*tch!

Build a wall -- kill them all!


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.