criminals in government

Post Reply New Topic

This thread is to vent anger or prove me wrong.

Not a watcher of Alex Jones but he might be on target here. More interesting than Alex Jones' understandable rant is the damning emails shown. Does anyone think they are false? If not, there's really no question in my mind that many people in power really belong in prison. Hate to say that, but Trump might have been right all along (although ties to Hillary might still be difficult to prove)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO_m1HBYf8E

I don't know what this is about but that pic looks like a publicity photo or Halloween Party. That drinking blood sounds like a publicity stunt. How do they know it's really blood? LG always does wacky stuff for attention.

Yes, should have mentioned ignore the first part of the video with Lady Gaga. Jones is reaching here in my opinion I think Gaga sees this as art which is fine. (whatever) I don't think Lady Gaga is a satanist.

But I'm talking about the emails and messages. Some of the emails directed towards and away from Podesta seem incriminating to me. My question is whether these emails are fake or not and if not fake, then aren't they suspicious?

Anyway we've got Trump elected. I feel we will be hearing more about this (sadly or happily? I don't really know anymore).

I think Lady Gaga has unwittingly been roped into it and it has been sold to her as liberal art and a form of being superior (something very appealing to Hollywood stars). I think many of the corrupt have used this liberal art angle to normalise what they are doing in case the scandal ever got made public.

Alex Jones for many years has been easy to dismiss as an over-energised wingnut with incredibly mad theories.
Almost everything he said about the Clintons and their campaign was all but confirmed by Wikileaks. So in the mind of some you could say he's now a doomsday prophet.

I need background info. So who is answering the Reddit questions? Not sure if it's a code or not or why anyone would want such a code on Reddit. What is the motivation of including a code on Reddit about a past event? Anything is possible but I would need more info to gage whether I think some kind of nefarious, incandescent communication is occurring. I talk about food with people I know and it's beyond a shadow of a doubt got nothing to do with anything but food. I would feel disturbed if someone thought I were trying to communicate anything like this. So, I don't know what to think of this.

One question I haven't heard anyone ask now Trump is elected is if he will prosecute HRC. She did put those emails on an unsecured server and that is illegal. Others have been imprisoned for the same thing. I don't agree with the GOP platform but it can't be denied Hillary made mistakes for whatever reason and ignorance isn't a legitimate defense, is it?

To put it as carefully as I can, because I don't know how this affects the house rules...
They are using code words and the companies connected are also using symbolism that let's certain types of people know they are attracted to minors and conduct certain activities.

If you read the Podesta emails, see a bunch of food talk with maps and hankies that would otherwise look unnatural as a conversation and blatantly code talk, then this should explain it for you. There are Wikipedia pages up telling you what the code words mean and what symbols to look out for in company logos (these have actually been provided by American and international law enforcement agencies by the way). And all of them are present in the emails, website communications, company branding in a particular street housing several businesses with connection to DC elite.

I could go on and on but Reddit users are connecting the dots. It's a bit embarrassing that the public has to get its breaking stories from Youtube users, shitpost forums and blogs now.

Many here have been shouting down what is being discussed in this thread, because it affects Democrats in influential positions including highly respected ones. I can link you to all the reddit etc. links so you can draw up your own conclusion but as far as this place goes I'm done talking about it. When you're browbeaten by users and mods alike, especially given the nature of the subject and the amount of pieces coming together, it's very exhausting/disappointing and I'd rather not bother.

In that case, experts should investigate it and reach conclusions then decide what to do about it.

What house rules? Are we not allowed to talk about this here?

I have not been active on WP for awhile, so I'm not sure what it's been like here politically. But I think everyone can agree that regular Democrats, and the rest of the world, could never have expected what came out in the Podesta emails. It was sitting right there for, what? Days? Weeks? And no one understood because it was too horrible. Regular people are not to blame for not being able to sniff that out. Democrats will be able to rebuild their party again- AND Republicans, because I don't think anyone expects that there aren't Republicans involved in that trash as well.

Extra guards on Barron Trump.

I'm not kidding.