EzraS wrote:
The city I live in and it's neighboring city of Seattle, have a lot of homeless people I have seen. And I mean a lot. And the vast majority I have seen are white.
Census figures indicate that Washington is over 80% white, under 5% black and under 13% hispanic.
Given this data, it should hardly be surprising that the vast majority of homeless people you see in vicinity of Seattle are white, but this in no way indicates something meaningful about the economic impact of skin color prejudice in the Seattle area.
If you are interested in the impact of skin color prejudice, look for instances in which individuals with different skin colors but otherwise similar circumstances interact with others. If the interactions are broadly similar then skin color prejudice is not a problem. If people with a particular skin color are regularly given preferential treatment or treated more harshly than others, this would indicate a problem.
Life doesn't conveniently supply well documented data sets isolated for one demographic variable, so most people approach this issue with bad data that is suggestive of an underlying problem and apply their inner ideological, religious, sectarian or psychological filters to come to some kind of conclusion about the issue.
A scrupulous approach would dictate that any conclusion was tentative and provisional, but political activity often leads people to claim certainty where none exists.
In general, an approach biased toward respecting the civil liberties and civil rights of all people will also protect those who may be subject to prejudice of various kinds, so I would suggest that a pro civil liberty/civil rights approach is superior to others in most situations.
_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.