The Truth : Evolution vs Creation (According to The Messiah)

Post Reply New Topic

It is the inner spiritual "body" the soul that is "In the image of God" in that it is "energetic" energy that is a "part" of the "body of God" the essence. The material fleshly biological body of man on earth was formed and evolved over time into its present "stature." Its stature and biological "nature" can and does "alter" due to earthly living circumstance. So evolution of the flesh is a fact.

It is the spirit within that has the nature of God being its capacity to think and feel, and link through into the "biology" of man, and the spirit within contains all the emotional "essences" of Light and Dark that we "grow" within as we either love or "sin."

Adam and Eve are "symbolic" figures used to "show" you how every "spirit" created and living in the high spirit realm after being spiritually created then "fell from grace" as they heeded the "call" of the serpent (the devil) that telepathically accessed their minds via the "vibration" of seeds of "sin" (negative emotions) and thus they by negative deed drew in more negative energy (as they supped on it) and fell to darker spiritual realms.

This material realm was created so that spirits from many diverse levels could incarnate into and intermingle at this END moment, and as "each" sups on my fresh uncontaminated truth its content will be "seen/heard/read" and via their psyche it will pass on through to their corresponding realm level to 'awaken the dead' in spiritual realms below.

Try to see how and why man "falls" and what is now required by God of man to attain salvation, for the "past" teachings of every religion are all distorted.

Let all good women and men pass this truth on to multitudes so that "each" can make a personally informed decision as to its truth and validity for them.

The word 'messiah' is the anglicisation of the Hebrew 'moshiach'. The word moshiach translates to 'anointed'. The title of moshiach was given to any person who was appropriately anointed with oil as part of their initiation to their service of HaShem. We have had many moshiachim (pl) in the form of kings, priests, prophets, and judges. There is absolutely nothing supernatural about a moshiach.

This being said, there is a prophecy of a future moshiach, however, this is a relatively minor topic in Judaism and the Tanach.

The Jewish requirements of hamoshiach are:

* Build the Third Temple (Ezekiel 37:26-28)
* Gather all Jews back to the Land of Israel (Isaiah 43:5-6)
* Usher in an era of world peace, and end all hatred, oppression, suffering and disease. As it says: "Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall man learn war anymore." (Isaiah 2:4)
* Spread universal knowledge of the God of Israel, which will unite humanity as one. As it says: "HaShem will be King over all the world -- on that day, HaShem will be One and His Name will be One" (Zechariah 14:9)
* Hamoshiach must be descended on his father's side from King David (Genesis 49:10 and Isaiah 11:1)
* Hamoshiach will lead the Jewish people to full Torah observance. The Torah states that all mitzvot remain binding forever, and anyone coming to change the Torah is immediately identified as a false prophet. (Deut. 13:1-4)

There is no prophecy of a virgin birth - Isaiah 7 contains a short term prophecy that was fulfilled in Isaiah's lifetime. The prophecy itself makes no mention of a virgin. The Hebrew word for virgin is 'b'tulah' which Isaiah uses throughout his writings. However, in this chapter, the word 'almah' is used. Almah means young woman and in this chapter, the young woman in question was already pregnant. The issue was that the Greeks did not have a word that was the equivalent to 'almah', instead, the translators used the word 'parthenos' which can mean either young woman OR virgin. In the prophecy itself, young woman's child simply served as the timeline for the prophecy itself: by the time the child is old enough to know good from bad, X would have occurred.

There is no specification as to where hamoshiach will be born. Mentions of Bethlehem are in reference to hamoshiach being a descendant of King David.

There is no specification as to when hamoshiach will be born. Daniel was talking about the destruction of the first Temple, construction of the second Temple, and then the destruction of the second Temple.

As to whether Jesus met any of the requirements of being hamoshiach, the answer is that no, he did not meet a single one. This includes his complete lack of tribal lineage - according to Jewish law tribal lineage is determined solely by the biological father, there is no concept of adoption in this scenario. In Jesus's case, the two lineages provided in an attempt to claim his status are invalid on several counts:

1. Biological father determines tribe, when a man and woman marry, the woman belongs to her husband's tribe. The lineages given for Jesus attempt to through Joseph via Mary's father which is invalid.

2. Kings must trace their lineage through King Solomon. The lineage provided in the book of Luke 3:31 goes through Nathan, Solomon's half brother. The lineage provided in Mathew 1:11-12 and Luke 3:27 goes through Shealtiel who was cursed so that none of his descendents could be king.

3. Regardless of the above lineages disqualifying Jesus, his lack of biological father completely disqualifies Jesus, so the above two points are actually irrelevant. As mentioned above, there is no concept of adoption when it comes to tribal affiliation. As Jesus is supposed to be the son of G-d, as opposed to being Joseph's biological son, Jesus does not belong to any tribe according to Jewish law. (Note: The concept of a literal child of HaShem is an abomination according to the Tanach (Jewish Bible) and the teachings of Judaism. This concept was adopted by Christianity from the various pagan religions of the region at that time.)

Thank you Terrence, for informing us all that you are "sane".

Thank you Terrence, for informing us all that you are "sane".

...to make a few things clear about Terence...

Terence does not want anybody to «worship» him...

Then the above "my" needs to be removed or changed to be reflective of that statement. Nevertheless, I do think some truths and valid points are presented here.