Aliens? Are they really parsimonious?

Post Reply New Topic

Some people think that aliens are a realistic possibility for visiting this world and altering it. The question though, is even though aliens are naturalistic, are they really a likely or ontologically parsimonious possibility? I mean, if you had to use Occam's razor today on the question of "who took my apple?" which idea would go first: a neighborhood kid/local crackhead, or ALIENS?

I would go with the kid, and the reason is simple. We have observed kids and crackheads in our every day lives, but rarely do we see aliens. In fact, I have never seen one. The problem is that invoking aliens as an explanation thus threatens our intellectual honesty. Even further, if aliens are like any animal that we see on our world, then if they ever visited, they would be taking us away as slaves, using us as pets, eating us, killing us, or farming us, just like we do with other animals, so that way they can get the rich minerals of our planet. Doing otherwise would make no sense, and instincts otherwise would undermine the possibility of survival.

Why is this important? Well, intellectual honesty and reductionist perspectives should ideally be synonymous with atheism. Now, I am aware that one of the major contenders for "most strident atheist", ruveyn, invokes aliens as a historical explanation, and my effort is to show that this is wrong and deeply problematic due to the common sense we all share. Atheism should be about rationality, and good old fashioned common sense to beat back the mystery beings of the world, not just invoking all sorts of ad hoc hypotheses because they are "natural", that is to misunderstand the basic idea.

This is part of the Awesomelyglorious initiative to promote reductionism and common sense and to STRIDENTLY show the flaws in some ideas.
(This message has been paid for by the commission to awesomize Awesomelyglorious)

It does seem unlikely that aliens capable of interstellar travel would want to raid our world for resources, down here at the bottom of a massive gravity well, when they could mine asteroids or Saturn's rings so much more easily. The only thing you can get more easily on Earth than elsewhere in the System is human beings.

However, back to the original point - if we employ Occam's razor, then intelligent alien invasion that somehow left no trace except for one or two engineering marvels (but not the science which supposedly created them) is hardly the parsimonious explanation, as it requires one to invent entities, in this case the alien life forms, with no evidence other than the existing marvels - all of which turn out to have been within the capabilities of local civilizations, particularly those which didn't especially care how many people died in the process (the slaves building the Egyptian Pyramids, the serfs working on the Cathedral at Chartes, etc). In each case with which I have been presented, the parsimonious explanation was indeed that humans did it - just because our ancestors didn't boast our levels of technology doesn't imply that they were stupid, after all...

i believe aliens like to have sex. and do other various sinful activies

I'd have to say that Rael isn't too parismonious, so I'd agree with your point.