LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
I don't see why gay marriage would change the rules on incest marrige
Also the people in the second article you posted weren't actually father and son, but since their gay marriage wouldn't be recognized one adopted the other and they posed as father and son legally. Also says the court had to dissolve the adoption for them to marry.
Not even close to the same thing as a biological father and son having an incestual gay relationship.
The justification for "incest" is to stop "inbreeding".
However, two men can't have a child.
So, this is just discrimination.
Gay marriage makes "adult-father-son-marriage" a civil rights cause.
There's still a power imbalance between, you'd sound less insane attempting to argue 'brother+brother' or 'sister+sister' marriage is a civil rights cause, but only less.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.