Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

Psychlone
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 713
Location: Michigan

21 Jun 2005, 8:06 pm

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin244.htm

Quote:
Opponents of the "Enabling Act" rightly warned that, if adopted, the Act would make Hitler a de facto dictator. They worried that the Act would dismantle constitutional liberties. History would prove that their worries were valid.

At the time, however, it was anything but certain that Hitler would prevail in convincing German lawmakers to pass his "Enabling Act." Then, suddenly, terrorists struck the Reichstag building.

After the Reichstag was burned on February 28, 1933, President Hindenburg and Hitler invoked Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution, which permitted the suspension of civil liberties during national emergencies. As a result, freedom of the press, free expression of opinion, individual property rights, right of assembly and association, right to privacy of postal and electronic communications, states' rights of self-government, and protection against unlawful searches and seizures were suspended. Shortly afterward, the "Enabling Act" was passed, and the rest, as they say, is history.

Of course, historians have widely speculated that it was Nazis, themselves, that had set the fire in order to facilitate passage of the "Enabling Act" and ensconce Hitler as Germany's Fuhrer. No one knows for sure who burned the Reichstag, but what we do know is that Hitler used that act of terrorism to gain the support of the people as a "wartime president."

The German people were convinced that their country was under attack and that Hitler was the leader who could protect them. Consider the statement of one of Hitler's most trusted cabinet members, Hermann Goering, "The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." (Source: Transcript of Nuremberg Trials)

Compare Goering's statement to former Attorney General John Ashcroft who, in defending the USA Patriot Act (which does much the same thing as Hitler's "Enabling Act") said, "To those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve." (Source: Press Report, Center for Public Integrity)

Is it only a coincidence (or a repeat of history) that Republicans have introduced a bill in Congress to nullify the 22nd Amendment thereby opening the door for President George W. Bush to become permanent president? (Source: U.S. House of Representatives, H.J. Res. 24 "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution" introduced February 17, 2005.)



Endersdragon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,662

21 Jun 2005, 10:23 pm

Does that make FDR as bad as Hitler??? He did serve alot longer then any other president. And does that mean we have to have term limits in Congress??? We dont want them to become dictators. Plus dont elections without the equivalant of a Nazi police force prevent him from becoming a dictator. Also do you really think that Bush will become a permanant President when no one did before the 22nd Admendment? Seems kinda unlogical to me. This sounds like a liberal scare tatic to me :-/.



Assassin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,676
Location: Not here, Not there, not anywhere.....

27 Jun 2005, 7:44 am

Seems to me more like the next step in an increesingly inevitable drift ritewards thats just come shockingly sudden.