For all practical purposes, Mr. Trump has ceased to govern. He continues to rant and issue bizarre directives, which his subordinates implement, amend, or simply disregard as they see fit.
Except in a ceremonial sense, the office of the presidency presently lies vacant. Call it an abdication-in-place. It's as if British King Edward VIII, having abandoned his throne for "the woman I love", continued to hang around Buckingham Palace fuming about the lack of respect given Wallis and releasing occasional bulletins affirming his admiration for that jack-booted, brown-shirted paperhanging thug who conquered most of Europe in the late 1930s and early 1940s.
In Mr. Trump's case, it's unlikely he ever had a more serious interest in governing than Edward had in performing duties more arduous than those he was eventually assigned as Duke of Windsor. Nonetheless, the 60-plus million Americans who voted for Mr. Trump did so with at least the expectation that he was going to shake things up.
And bigly. Remember, he was going to "lock her up". He would "drain the swamp" and "build a wall" with Mexico volunteering to foot the bill. Without further ado, he would end "this American carnage". Meanwhile, "America First" would form the basis for U.S. foreign policy. Once Mr. Trump took charge, things were going to be different, as he and he alone would "make America great again".
Yet the cataclysm that Mr. Trump's ascendency was said to signify has yet to occur. Barring a nuclear war, it won't.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.