Is the alt-right ruining movies?

Post Reply New Topic

In a Tim pool video he referenced a study that showed left wing people were more likely to talk down to black people than right wing people. So that wouldn't shock me.

Typically, "racists" are people who tend to have fairly negative views of Muslims or Blacks as a group but who tend to get along quite fine with them when they meet them in person.

Meanwhile, "anti-racists" typically have a fairly positive views of Muslims or Blacks as a group, but when they actually meet them in person it's a different story.

I guess this is one of many reasons why life is considered to be ironic?

Also, Hong Kong used to be a British territory for a long time.

Your argument basically boils down to 'some people are worse than me'.
A state belongs to it's people in terms of national citizenship, not in terms of ethnicity. At the end of the day diaspora have no claim to the nation except in terms of ethnic identity; immigrants with citizenship do regardless of their ethnic background - they're just as x as the x.

British territory, yes... but it never stopped being ethnically Chinese.

Nor did it suddenly make all inhabitants of Hong Kong ethnically British.

Ethnicity (defined by common ancestry, language, history & culture) and ethnicity only is what makes you Chinese or British.



Incorrect.

It boils down to "some people are different from me and my ethnic group".

This is not a matter of one ethnic group being superior or inferior to another.

It's a matter of every ethnic group being different, both biologically and culturally.

Mixing different ethnic groups significantly reduces the homogeneity of a nation, which in turn makes societies less stable, increases friction and makes it harder to provide a body of laws that are perceived as fair and just by the majority.

That is we it's important to keep heterogeneity within a nation manageable, by keeping the amount of alien ethnic groups within a nation as low as possible.

You missed what I meant. By worse I meant 'more racist'. Try again.

I think I see what you meant now.

It doesn't discredit any of his arguments against "multiculturalism", though.

Nor does it make your calling him "racist" any less prejudiced and any less of an insult.

Also, note you're completely ignoring my argument against "multiculturalism". I suppose that's because you're unable to form a counter-argument?

I'm also getting ready for work, which is why you won't get any further posts from me for the next ~10 hours.

Muslim isn't a race though. Muslims worship a God that would condemn me and everyone I care about to eternity in Hell so rightfully I have negative feelings towards them.

So I have thousands of years of Heritage on Britain but someone who moves here is as British as me because of piece of paper?

Arabs are a distinct ethnic group, defined both by race & culture.

Most Muslims in continental Europe tend to be Arabs.

Hence, the term "Muslim" & "Arab" are often used interchangeably in certain contexts over here.



The same applies to Jews & Christians, though.

This would be a strong argument against abolishing all Abrahamic religion... but not so much against barring entry to certain ethnic groups.

What are you going to do with Iranian & Pakistani Atheists?

I don't think Jews believe in Hell.

Here in Britain most Muslims are South Asian like Pakistanis etc. They actually are the biggest victims of racism here they get it far more than blacks. Never has a stranger said something racist about blacks to me but countless times absolute strangers have made "paki" jokes to me.

I would support Atheists fleeing Islam being granted Asylum in the UK.

Maybe not... but they do have this superiority complex, where they are "God's chosen people" and us goyim don't really matter.

Basically, every strain of Abrahamic faith has this belief that somehow they are "special" and rewarded by their God for being "special", whereas everyone else will have a less pleasant fate and doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things.



So your arguments against multiculturalism are based purely on incompatible culture?

I think Abrahamic faiths survived because they were supremacist beliefs. Don't believe in Odin and Odin turns out to be real oh well nothing happens to you, Don't believe in the Christian God and he turns of to be real well you burn in Hell forever. Also Both Christianity and Islam had a huge empire behind them.

No my primary argument against multiculturalism in Britain is that no one voted for it. The incompatible cultures thing is also important but there are many other reason such as being called privileged in my own country, the government being able to depend on foreign labour allows them to fail our own people (myself included), Western governments taking educated skilled labour from developing countries not only hinders those countries economically but also politically they are the ones most likely to bring about change. I also think its an attempt to change our view of class in the UK one from that is tied to the Aristocracy stealing wealth and land to one that is purely based on wealth and income thus haltering any chance of land reform.

The ones in power voted for it. And it's not like they care about what us muggles think about it.

In fact, one of the reasons they imposed "multiculturalism" upon is, is to keep us weak and divided.

The Romans already understood how to rule an empire through "Divide et impera".

Another reason is Hate speech laws. No way would Western Europe have blasphemy laws if it wasn't for immigration. The other day in the UK a politician had a man arrested for calling her a Nazi even though she was calling him and other protesters far right which is essentially the same thing.