APA guidelines warn of 'traditional masculinity,' men harmed by too much 'competitiveness'
Quote:
The American Psychological Association’s latest guidelines suggest parents are playing with fire when they instill boys with “traditional masculinity.”
Turn off those iconic Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger movies: researchers now say that “stoicism, competitiveness, dominance, and aggression — is, on the whole, harmful,” for boys and men.
The “first-ever” guidelines are described on APA’s website as follows:
“APA’s new Guidelines for Psychological Practice With Boys and Men strive to recognize and address these problems in boys and men while remaining sensitive to the field’s androcentric past. Thirteen years in the making, they draw on more than 40 years of research showing that traditional masculinity is psychologically harmful and that socializing boys to suppress their emotions causes damage that echoes both inwardly and outwardly.
APA’s Guidelines for Psychological Practice With Girls and Women were issued in 2007 and, like the guidelines for men and boys, aim to help practitioners assist their patients despite social forces that can harm mental health. Many researchers who study femininity also work on masculinity: Several contributors to the guidelines for girls and women have also contributed to the new guidelines for boys and men.
‘Though men benefit from patriarchy, they are also impinged upon by patriarchy,’ says Ronald F. Levant, EdD, a professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Akron and co-editor of the APA volume ‘The Psychology of Men and Masculinities.’ Levant was APA president in 2005 when the guideline-drafting process began and was instrumental in securing funding and support to get the process started.”
Clinicians are encouraged to recognize their own biases when dealing with males, the “integrated nature of masculinity,” and ways that “power, privilege, and sexism work both by conferring benefits to men and by trapping them in narrow roles.”
This is another example of typical American overcorrection. Society had and still does to some degree accepted mistreatment of women under the guise of "men will be men". If you do not accept that you live in a bubble, are in denial or are misogynist yourself. The problem thankfully is in the process of being corrected and this process by necessity is often painful.
Correcting misogyny by misandry is not the way to go. Calling this misandry is not out of bounds. If the APA looked at the stats and concluded blackness leads to being a greater chance of being a criminal or a crime victim they would be pilloried. If the APA claimed that being your natural LBGQT self is harmful because that stats said it makes you perennially depressed, prone to seduce young boys oh wait they used to claim that. The APA has chosen to ignore the reality of two wrongs not making a right.
Call me disordered but what America needs at the moment is more stoicism not less. Stoicism taken to far is no good, if you are getting chest pains and are out of breath trying to tough it out might be a fatal call. The same concept is true for all of the other "harmful" traits listed. Dominance is good to a certain extent unless you like anarchy, somebody has to lead.
The last paragraph urges members to recognize their own biases. I wish the drafters of these guidelines had done that.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
22 Feb 2019, 6:25 pm
