Page 5 of 10 [ 152 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next

TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

20 Mar 2019, 2:49 pm

Fnord wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
Fine, I accept defeat. You may proceed with my execution by firing squad! :salut: ....please? :mrgreen:
Very well.

Ready!

Aim!

Image

FIRE!


*plays this sad song at funeral*



grahambaster
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 439
Location: Upper Midwest, USA

20 Mar 2019, 2:55 pm

It's true if you believe it.


_________________
Friends ♥ Forever Internet Radio ~ Wherever Particular People Congregate


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,904
Location: Stendec

20 Mar 2019, 3:11 pm

Belief before truth?

Sounds like religion to me.



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

20 Mar 2019, 3:17 pm

Fnord wrote:
Belief before truth?

Sounds like religion to me.

And which truth would that be? The true truth or the truth that the public accepts without question until it gets changed to another truth? :tongue:

Like homosexuality being a mental illness, giant squids never existing, the Food Pyramid instead of The Food Wheel, etc.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,904
Location: Stendec

20 Mar 2019, 3:50 pm

Examples of Belief Before Truth can be found at This Wikipedia Page.

I suggest that you give the list a long, hard read before coming back and telling me that anything you believe is automatically true.



Crimadella
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2019
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,644
Location: Warner Robins, Ga

20 Mar 2019, 4:01 pm

Fnord wrote:
Examples of Belief Before Truth can be found at This Wikipedia Page.

I suggest that you give the list a long, hard read before coming back and telling me that anything you believe is automatically true.



Hmmm, but by definition, belief is a truth. That's why I dislike the word truth, because a truth doesn't have to be a fact or verifiable, the only thing that it requires is to be believed. To me it's just a deceptive word, where people tend to think that a truth actually has to be factual or accurate, the word commonly gets abused. We have talked about this before though, so I will just leave it at that.

Truth - a fact or belief that is accepted as true.

I think I have a solution, wonder if it will catch on and be included in a dictionary...

Futh - An event that did occur but cannot be confirmed.
"You don't know what the futh is because you weren't there"



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

20 Mar 2019, 4:13 pm

Two sides to every story. :mrgreen:



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,904
Location: Stendec

20 Mar 2019, 4:20 pm

Crimadella wrote:
... by definition, belief is a truth.
How very odd … that definition appears in no dictionary that I know of, but this one does...

belief (n):

1) a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing

2) something that is accepted, considered to be true, or held as an opinion

3) conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence


Crimadella wrote:
That's why I dislike the word truth, because a truth doesn't have to be a fact or verifiable, the only thing that it requires is to be believed. To me it's just a deceptive word, where people tend to think that a truth actually has to be factual or accurate, the word commonly gets abused. We have talked about this before though, so I will just leave it at that. Truth - a fact or belief that is accepted as true.
Another spurious definition. The actual definition is...

truth(n):

1) the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality

2) the state of being the case : fact

3) the property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or reality

4) sincerity in action, character, and utterance


You can't go 'round making up your own definitions when there are others who know better.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,904
Location: Stendec

20 Mar 2019, 4:22 pm

TW1ZTY wrote:
Two sides to every story.
Yes -- Truth and Lies.



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

20 Mar 2019, 4:29 pm

Fnord wrote:
TW1ZTY wrote:
Two sides to every story.
Yes -- Truth and Lies.

And misunderstandings. :D



Crimadella
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2019
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,644
Location: Warner Robins, Ga

20 Mar 2019, 5:43 pm

Fnord wrote:
Crimadella wrote:
... by definition, belief is a truth.
How very odd … that definition appears in no dictionary that I know of, but this one does...

belief (n):

1) a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing

2) something that is accepted, considered to be true, or held as an opinion

3) conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence


Crimadella wrote:
That's why I dislike the word truth, because a truth doesn't have to be a fact or verifiable, the only thing that it requires is to be believed. To me it's just a deceptive word, where people tend to think that a truth actually has to be factual or accurate, the word commonly gets abused. We have talked about this before though, so I will just leave it at that. Truth - a fact or belief that is accepted as true.
Another spurious definition. The actual definition is...

truth(n):

1) the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality

2) the state of being the case : fact

3) the property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or reality

4) sincerity in action, character, and utterance


You can't go 'round making up your own definitions when there are others who know better.



Don't get paranoid Fnord, I'm not so low of a person that I would try to make definitions up. I don’t have a dictionary, I use the Google search to define words, like this...

"word definition"

To regain my trust, type "truth definition" into you google search bar and you should get the same result that I did.

So, the futh of the matter is you were not hear to witness me look the definition up, but I have lead you to the way you can look it up as I did and see I was telling the futh.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

21 Mar 2019, 8:27 pm

wowiexist wrote:
I have always been curious about it so I am just wondering if anyone believes in it.


This isn't some sort of black ops culling program initiative, is it? 8O



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,196
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

21 Mar 2019, 10:27 pm

I think Pepe said something either in this thread or another thread, ie. that as aspies we tend to go really deep into researching special interests and getting to know the ins and outs of them, that we quite often don't research other areas and count on a surface skim. This topic has always seemed lop-sided to me because it's almost guaranteed that profound and strident skeptics are coming from that place - ie. they rarely ever know the ins and outs of the topic, the best research, the best cases to be made, the closest I've seen to come to that and read much on these things were shlaifu and the second (female - not the Resourced-Based Economy MC) incarnation of Adamantium and even there the digestion of this material is almost always bulldozed with psychological theories. You have the reverse of this, lets say, with the bible because something like the bible unravels the more you read it. With the rest of the examination of the world of psi it seems like the opposite, and when you have a die-hard skeptic actually give it a chance and explore it they might still stake their core in something like eliminative materialism but, I think Susan Blackmore is a great example of this, she's at least convinced of the depth of a mystery that other people are papering over.

That's probably one of the things that's the most astounding to me on these topics - ie. that almost anywhere else, other than politics or 'spirituality', everyone's competing for the best set of facts where here and in politics it seems like people are trying to find the most perfect designer set of blinders. I don't base that suggestion on people disagreeing with me and if it weren't quite a bit more than that, ie. entire style and approach to information, I wouldn't feel confident that I was seeing past my own pet distortions (the assumption goes that if you could see them you wouldn't have them) but there are tells which can inform you - even if someone fully agrees with you in theory - that they agree with you for poorly thought out reasons and you can see just as well when they disagree and it's as if you're trying to speak to a part of them that's hiding a missing limb or a gunshot wound from themselves, something that they can't explore... almost out of a sense sometimes that I think it would unravel them.


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

22 Mar 2019, 5:20 am

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
I think Pepe said something either in this thread or another thread, ie. that as aspies we tend to go really deep into researching special interests and getting to know the ins and outs of them, that we quite often don't research other areas and count on a surface skim. This topic has always seemed lop-sided to me because it's almost guaranteed that profound and strident skeptics are coming from that place - ie. they rarely ever know the ins and outs of the topic, the best research, the best cases to be made, the closest I've seen to come to that and read much on these things were shlaifu and the second (female - not the Resourced-Based Economy MC) incarnation of Adamantium and even there the digestion of this material is almost always bulldozed with psychological theories. You have the reverse of this, lets say, with the bible because something like the bible unravels the more you read it. With the rest of the examination of the world of psi it seems like the opposite, and when you have a die-hard skeptic actually give it a chance and explore it they might still stake their core in something like eliminative materialism but, I think Susan Blackmore is a great example of this, she's at least convinced of the depth of a mystery that other people are papering over.

That's probably one of the things that's the most astounding to me on these topics - ie. that almost anywhere else, other than politics or 'spirituality', everyone's competing for the best set of facts where here and in politics it seems like people are trying to find the most perfect designer set of blinders. I don't base that suggestion on people disagreeing with me and if it weren't quite a bit more than that, ie. entire style and approach to information, I wouldn't feel confident that I was seeing past my own pet distortions (the assumption goes that if you could see them you wouldn't have them) but there are tells which can inform you - even if someone fully agrees with you in theory - that they agree with you for poorly thought out reasons and you can see just as well when they disagree and it's as if you're trying to speak to a part of them that's hiding a missing limb or a gunshot wound from themselves, something that they can't explore... almost out of a sense sometimes that I think it would unravel them.


Are you committing to the belief in re-incarnation?...
Or are you simply advancing the principle of openmindedness?...



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,196
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

22 Mar 2019, 6:14 am

Pepe wrote:
Are you committing to the belief in re-incarnation?...
Or are you simply advancing the principle of openmindedness?...

I already gave my position much earlier in the thread.

Also I don't even like the idea of it being 'open-mindedness', that sounds way too much like a request to 'be nice' which is just wearing weakness on one's sleeve. Its more like probing the question of why intellectual consistency so reliably fails in this range. Intellectual consistency is something I would think flows in the same direction as self-interest and yet I see it consistently fall down with people when it gets challenging. No one has to do anything different, I'm sure no one will over anything I say, but it seems to illustrate that we're incorrigible, that self-interest can't even properly govern human behavior, and that the things we either pay avid attention to or refuse to pay adequate attention to are governed ultimately by alogical causes that we'd never begin to understand. The only layer of that which makes a certain degree of sense is obeying the dictates of conformity to get things out of society, but there are points after which even that fails to be a fully satisfying explanation.


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

22 Mar 2019, 9:49 am

I still believe in reincarnation despite Fnord trying to put my personal beliefs down. :mrgreen: