thinkinginpictures wrote:
Pepe wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
We have to watch this guy.
This guy has elements of Muslim extremism/Jihadism in him.
Speculation has been made questioning whether or not the attempted "coup" was actually a false flag event...
I can see this man being capable of such a thing...
If true:
Adolf Hitler would be proud...
But Mustafa Kemal Atatürk would be turning in his grave...

I consider it a FACT that Erdogan orchestrated the "attempted coup" himself.
It is obvious, given the fact that Erdogan gained so much political power from this situation.
Like it is also a FACT that Hitler was responsible for setting fire to the Reichstag.
Its not conspiracy theory. It is a fact.
It is a "fact" if there is verifiable evidence...
I haven't seen any to date...
Please supply some if you have it...
But there comes a point where circumstantial evidence is so great that speculation is beyond reasonable doubt...
Russia's poisoning of Skripal is an example...
Erdogan had the motive and the means of staging a false flag event, as did Hitler when Hitler concocted the Polish attack on the German radio station and others...
Quote:
The Gleiwitz incident (German: Überfall auf den Sender Gleiwitz; Polish: Prowokacja gliwicka) was a covert Nazi German attack on the German radio station Sender Gleiwitz on the night of 31 August 1939 (today Gliwice, Poland). The attack is widely regarded as a false flag operation, staged with some two dozen similar German incidents on the eve of the invasion of Poland leading up to World War II in Europe.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incidentQuote:
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—such as a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference.
https://www.google.com/search?q=circums ... e&ie=UTF-8Quote:
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. The standard that must be met by the prosecution's evidence in a criminal prosecution: that no other logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendant committed the crime, thereby overcoming the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreediction ... able+doubt