thinkinginpictures wrote:
They're not in any "meltdown mode". What happens is that the Mueller report found no evidence that Trump conspired with Putin. You could commit a murder with no evidence, and you will not be jailed. But if someone had committed a murder, evidence or not, that person is still a murderer. A thief is also a thief, despite evidence or lack thereof.
Does it mean they should be punished legally? Of course not, if no evidence is present, nobody should be jailed or recieve any other sentence. That's how a civilized society works.
But fact of the matter is that Trump has met with Putin with no recordings, an zero notes/documentation. But we do know they've had talks. We don't know what they talked about.
We also know that Putin very much likes Trump and vice versa.
We also know that Trump questions NATO alliance - and that makes Putin happy.
We also know that Russia interfered in the election 2016, despite lack of evidence Trump ordered it.
But there is evidence that Russia interfered in the election.
What also happens is that you are so much a Trump supporter, that even if there was any evidence of Trump and Putin conspiring, you either won't accept the fact OR you'll probably say "That's OK, what's wrong with Putin?"
That's what every other Trump-supporter is saying.
They've been screaming about collusion and pushing the hoax 24 hours a day for 3 years so they are now falling apart.
There was no crime, the whole thing was a sham.
Talking with another leader is fine. If the establishment hadn't been pushing the hysterical hoax he wouldn't have needed to do such a thing.
Sorry but $4700 on Google ads that weren't hardly about the election and some being anti Trump is not interfering in anything. So no.
Shows what you know. I've made a thread on this site pledging my support for Tulsi Gabbard.
_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"