smudge wrote:
So a singular belief system for everybody would make no difference.
The conundrum that seems to occur with religion - for most people it seems to need to be a) irrationally held, b) adherents make enough conforming sacrifices that they 'fit in' with one another (thank you Jonathan Haidt on that observation) and c) its part of a family tradition for them to feel threatened enough to stay involved. Otherwise if people were told that every religion is a system for growing oneself and one's relationship to the Universe and that aside from choosing one that contains the symbols you grew up with the specific make or model is less important than what you'd do with it - I get the impression that most people would either give it up altogether or drift into the 'spiritual but not religious' camp.
While that is speculation and it could prove true or untrue with things like civic organizations (ie. the Bowling Alone may say more about our current culture than our tendencies 'if left to ourselves') I do worry that most people don't join civic or religious groups without some type of push. The trouble with that - if we want to revivify social capital in the west we may need to take a completely different approach and I'm not sure what looks like in the 21st century nor whether we have the will to do it. Too many systems unfortunately - advertisers, corporations, governments, etc. - in a gesellschaft system benefit from atomized individuals who either need to project their internal needs out in the form of shopping or who don't have the financial resources to sue when these agencies behave badly.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.