Drought Panic Over
Drought Panic Over
h/t to Jim Sternhell, Frank Brus, via Jim Simpson.
Droughts, Australia, Climate Council.
Professor Andy Pitman, UNSW
In June Professor Andy Pitman quietly dropped a bomb:
“…as far as the climate scientists know there is no link between climate change and drought.”
“…there is no reason a priori why climate change should made the landscape more arid.“
He’s admitting there’s never been a scientific basis for the endless climate drought scares? He went on to say that in Australia, droughts are not increasing, and there’s no drying trend in one hundred years of data. He’s also admitting the models can’t predict extremes in rain either. Where are the press releases?
It’s great to hear him speaking like a skeptical scientist, with candor and care, but 52% of Australians (including many of our politicians) think “climate change” is already causing more frequent droughts. So half the country is not only convinced droughts are increasing, but they think climate change is causing an effect that isn’t happening. And the world is spending $330b a year on windmills and solar panels in the hope of stopping droughts, among other things.
Professor Andy Pitman, UNSW
There’s no link? Has Andy Pitman told the Climate Council?
Pitman follows this with: “this may not be what you read in newspapers…” No, Sir. And the 64 billion dollar question (which isn’t asked) is – why not? And what are you doing about that?
Does Andy Pitman keep trying to tell journalists the full and accurate story and they won’t print it? (Well, we know what that’s like.) Given his roles as Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, and as a Lead Author for the IPCC, does it bother him when he sees his specialty misreported over and over again? Since the taxpayer funds him, isn’t there an obligation to correct the record?; to flick an email to the ABC journalists who keep saying climate change is linked to drought, or drop a five minute phone call to Peter Hannam of the Sydney Morning Herald who is still getting it wrong? He may even want to call his own researcher at the centre where he is a director. Andrew King advised Hannam on that last link which is filled with “human fingerprints” of “drought” and emerging “greenhouse signals”. The article even says — completely incorrectly –“Australia is among the regions of the world where the drying trend is clearest”. http://joannenova.com.au/2019/08/prof-a ... te-change/
There is "climate change." The question, really, is if it is naturally occurring; if it is man-made; or if it's a combination of both.
I am not in favor of using "climate change" as a political issue----or as a way to arbitrarily intrude in peoples' lives.
The Australian interior has droughts every year. It is a mostly arid region. Inevitably, it gets quite hot in the summer there. Inevitably, there is a water shortage there.
The topic at hand is not whether there is climate change, but whether climate change results in more droughts. I do not have enough meterological science expertise to say whether this is the case or not. Apparently, this one professor thinks it is not the case.
_________________
"Ignorance may be bliss, but knowledge is power."
Climate change can certainly lead to more droughts. It's been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt. It has happened many times in our geological history.
This has nothing, whatsoever, to do with "man-made climate change."
There is a theory extant---which has many adherents--which states that a sharp reduction in rainfall, approximately 3-4 million years ago, lead to the loss of tropical forest, and an increase in savanna vegetation and desert in (what is now) the Saharan and Sub-Saharan regions of Africa.
According to this theory, the ancestors of man, originally creatures of the forest, were forced by habitat loss to reside in the savanna.
Correspondingly, the previous savannas became deserts (namely, the Sahara Desert in Africa).
Because there were few trees to swing from for locomotion, and because they were primarily on the ground now, they had to adopt bipedal locomotion as their primary means of getting from A to B. This, according to the theory, was one of the main impetuses behind the evolution from ape-like creature to Man.
