RushKing wrote:
Let people make up their own minds.
The place where fake news got turned around was when it was rumored that AntiFa beat up an old man at random and it turned out he was a voluntary part of a skirmish. They were bringing violence, he decided to play the violence game too, tit for tat - that detail changes everything. I can't think of a threshold where journalism breaks the violence mark unless a particular journalist is being so irresponsible as to call for violence against a group of people and even there that's such a public and printed blunder that the authorities have everything they need to take them to task on that.
Yes, people can make up their own minds, but still I think it would rely on people's ignorance to say 'Ah, he was out in the iffy right-of-center zone - the attack and his politics wash even'.
RushKing wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
That doesn't seem like something one would say unless they're either relying on word of mouth without following up to see what the IDW actually is or they've taken to calling the center-left right-wing. Neither case speaks well for the author.
I know you in particular are very big IDW follower. I would personally categorize them as center-right.
I can't trust them after this event -they all immediately wanted to start a witch hunt.
Quillette or the IDW and if the IDW which particular members? I think specifics will help make your point better and may start a more interesting conversation than the article.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.