Male rage and the words men use to describe Greta Thunberg

Post Reply New Topic

In this Case One Loud Greta Voice of Truth
Cancels out
One Loud Voice of Trump Lies.

In Other Words, at least she has good intentions;
And is Just repeating Scientific Consensus. That's amazing these days all by itself..

"The road to hell is paved with" something-or-other.

You do realise that "consensus" is not what it is cracked up to be, right?
Are you aware that "scholarly" papers/studies which are peer-reviewed are often hampered by political bias?
The number of times I have come across the disclosure by academics saying they needed to favour a certain view to even get a guernsey is, well, quite a number indeed.

In a previous thread, I pointed out how flawed the peer-review system actually is.
I suggest you get your big handsome head, full of brain cells, around that buddy boy.

BTW, Many who joined the "consensus bandwagon" weren't even qualified to give an opinion. <EEP!>

In addition to this:
There are qualified critical thinkers out there who disagree with "the consensus".

By-the-way, what is the consensus anyway?
I have yet to find anyone brave or cluey enough to definitively, err, define what "the consensus" position is.
Would you like to take a crack at it?
Please?

P.S.
I muchly appreciated your short reply. <big wet kiss>

Nice to see you to can think rationally when you set your mind to it.




Do you crave attention?


Are you boasting or simply sharing?


I have a theory:
You have gone through physical/emotional pain that no one should ever have had to go through.
This changes people,
And when they find relief,
It can change their entire outlook on life, the universe and everything/k.

Good for you.
What works to you, err, works for you.
I have seen the exact same thing happen to a friend of mine.



She has definitely left an impression on me,
But not a good one.
While I am not attacking the 16-year-old girl,
I see her performance as hysterical (in both senses of the word) over information that is extremely flawed.

I would like to reassure Greta that she will not be extinct in 12 years time if CO2 emissions are not reduced to the unreasonable levels she is demanding. <comfort>


Firstly:
Not everyone venerates/worships undisciplined "Passion".
Passion without reason/rationality is simply food for the proletariat.
Her belief in a 12-year deadline is far from a rational position, imo.

Secondly:
Greta tells what she believes to be the truth.
I concur.
That is a good start but without mature metacognition, she is more likely to be suffering from "Illusory Superiority".

Simply believing one knows the truth doesn't make it so.
One must first be in a position to know one's abilities and limitations.
This comes through life experience.
Life experiences tend to produce wisdom.
There is no substitute for "experience" that I am aware of.

Trust me.
I am the Oracle of Truth after all.

Well, that's it!
"No soup for you!"
What I mean to say is that this is all the cerebral energy I am prepared to give to your long post.
Consider yourself blessed to be receiving this much divine enlightenment.

Cheers Cobber.

That's the genius of taking action on 'climate change'. I've said it before and I'll say it again and again and again: 'Climate change' is the most perfect vehicle for controlling all aspects of people's lives on a global scale that has been or probably ever will be devised. It's perfect because it's nebulous, it's ever changing and therefore forever in need of modification. Implement rules X, Y and Z to limit, change, prevent or punish behaviors A, B and C. That didn't work? Implement additional rules E, J, R to further limit, change, prevent or punish behaviors of the masses. That didn't work? No matter: Implement additional rules.......... Never questioned. Always right and always with an urgency that will never go away. It's behavior modification and control in perpetuity. I can not believe that I'm the only person that sees the potential danger in this.

When I was in my 20's I had all kinds of fear and anxiety about the world ending. People didn't know how to help me because they knew reassurance wouldn't really help when even they weren't positive things would turn out okay, or they'd tell me I was being foolish and blowing everything out of proportion, like my mom when hurricane Juan hit Halifax, Nova Scotia, and I was afraid of a major hurricane hitting us here in Sydney, Nova Scotia. And that wasn't long after 9/11.

Now I can't buy anything made of plastic without feeling guilty, even if it's something I intend to keep for many years like toys or furniture. I'm sure the REUSABLE bags and food containers I own are plastic too, but eventually they wear out with use and get thrown away anyhow. You can't win.

I wonder how these men would act if it was an adult man instead? They'd probably still be horrible. Human beings always find an excuse to be horrible.

I see the same thing. It's all about control. The biggest proponents of it are also the PC "progressive" crowd. What you described is what I fear regarding my future. I see it as a far greater threat than climate change.

Speaking of control, I think if we end up living in a Republican Evangelical Christian-controlled country they're gonna lock people just like me up in prison, or worse.

I'll end up a victim of religous persecution by fanatical nutjobs who tolerate Trump and Pence because they believe those two are helping them to gain more power and influence over the country. It's always about power and control with Christiains...




^ Me vs The Evangelical Trump Supporters

No, it's only the evul liberalz who try to censor and control people. There's never been any connection between religion and censorship. /sarcasm

More like the gullible liberals who don't realize what they are ultimately going to end up with.

Those untrustworthy liberalz. Let's trust in the oil companies instead.

Yeah! We can use their oil to burn those liberal heretics at the stake!

Trump is a fart in the wind. It's the long term picture you should consider. From what I hear there is a steady increase in STDs. Do you think those who want to control what we consume in the guise of making us healthier won't also want to control sex to protect us from STDs and to prevent unwanted pregnancies to keep the population down in their effort to control climate change to save us from extinction.

From what I understand millennials are having less "unwanted pregnancies" now and most of them are choosing not have children because it's too expensive, and the Evangelicals hate that because they think we all need to be forced to engage in heterosexual marriages and pop out as many babies as possible to keep the American population alive.

As for the STD thing, science can fight that a helluva lot better than Christians do. Their idea of combating STDs is shaming anybody who contracts one and pretending like sex does not exist.

Many people who are “progressives” these days are not necessarily into “free love” like the hippies were 40-50 years ago.

They want to control the population and advocate having less children. They tend to be careful in their choice of partners.

“Progressive”—usually not hippie-like. Especially in the Millennial generation. In fact, they are rather cautious and strait-laced in sexual matters.

You don't need control or strict rules to convince people to have less children. A drop in the infant mortality rate does wonders for family planning.

In China they have the One Child law...