vermontsavant wrote:
Your so so wrong,jailing people without evidence of a actually crime is knocking on the door of genocide.
The Nazi's put asocials in camps and asocials are sort of non violent sociopaths.
Remember at one time autism was considered a type of sociopathy. Die autistischen psychopaten im kindasalter,meaning autistic psychopathy in childhood was Hans Asperger's original term for autism.
Your way out of bounds unless your in Nazi Germany,or modern day Morocco where gays get three years in prison for being gay.I have a post about that in LGBT forum.
What you calling for is fascist,I will stop short of calling you a fascist personally but your ideas are fascist.
Psychopaths commit moral crimes. Bullying.
Most bullies (if not 100 %) are psychopaths. That's enough reason to punish them for who they are, not what they do.
Eliminating bullying can only be achieved through mass-incarceration of psychopaths.
Let them work in labor camps for a lifetime.
AprilR wrote:
I think a lot about this. If psychopathy is something related to brain difference, it means it is not a choice. Just because someone is more prone to be violent/commit crimes by nature it doesn't mean they should be eliminated since being born like this wasn't their choice. Maybe they should be kept under surveillance?
That's a free-will debate. While I do agree we have no free will, we still have a will (urge). It's just that it isn't free.
You still make a choice, it's just that you weren't free to make that choice, but that does not matter to me.
What matters is if you felt good or bad about the choice you made.
Psychopaths make a choice of bullying. It's not that they were free to make another choice - they weren't.
The key is that they felt good about it.
That's enough to jail them for life in a labor camp, forced to do hard work.
Last edited by thinkinginpictures on 11 May 2020, 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.