White support for BLM decreasing after surge

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

19 Aug 2020, 6:47 pm

Support For Black Lives Matter Surged During Protests, But Is Waning Among White Americans

Quote:
The recent protests against police brutality are some of the largest and most widespread in American history. An estimated 15 million to 26 million Americans have taken to the streets to protest police violence and advocate for Black lives.

The remarkable size and scope of these demonstrations has translated into real policy gains, too. Dozens of state and local police reforms have been enacted since the protests started. And at the federal level, President Trump signed an executive order that outlines his administration’s priorities for police reform, including creating a national database that catalogues police misconduct. The House of Representatives passed an even more ambitious piece of legislation that proposes a series of reforms, like tying federal funding to bans on chokeholds and setting up a task force to address excessive police force, but the GOP-controlled Senate hasn’t taken it up.

Arguably, though, the protests’ impact on public opinion has been even more immediate and wide-ranging. Unfavorable views of the police, acknowledgement of widespread discrimination against African Americans and support for Black Lives Matter all jumped up by at least 10 percentage points, according to tracking polls conducted shortly before and after the protests by both Democracy Fund + UCLA Nationscape and Civiqs.

These changes in public opinion are being driven in large part by white Americans, who for years have been much less likely than Black Americans to acknowledge that racial inequality remains a real problem. Since the first wave of large-scale Black Lives Matter protests in 2014, white Americans’ racial attitudes have gradually become more liberalized while Black Americans’ views have remained relatively steady.

Trump’s many offensive statements may be contributing to this trend, as they seem to be driving Democrats, particularly white Democrats, to adopt more liberal views on race in response. That’s one reason so many white Democrats showed up at the most recent protests.

But the protests’ impact on public opinion appears to be fading — particularly among white Americans. Black Americans’ opinions have stayed much steadier, as they have in the past.

Drawing on data from the Democracy Fund + UCLA Nationscape’s weekly tracking surveys, I found that unfavorable views of the police are trending back down toward their pre-protest levels among white Americans and have dipped among Black Americans. White respondents are also becoming somewhat less likely to say that African Americans face “a lot” or “a great deal” of discrimination, though those numbers remain higher than they were before before George Floyd was killed in May. Black Americans’ views on the discrimination they face have remained essentially unchanged.

he same patterns are evident in tracking surveys from Civiqs and YouGov/The Economist. In the Civiqs data, white respondents’ net support (support minus opposition) for the Black Lives Matter movement surged from -4 shortly before the protests to +10 in early June, but has since dropped to 6 points underwater. Meanwhile, Black Americans’ net support went from +76 in early May to +85 in early June and has remained within a point of that mark ever since. And in the YouGov/The Economist surveys, the share of white Americans who said racism is a big problem decreased from 45 percent in June to 33 percent when the question was last asked in early August. Three-quarters of Black Americans, on the other hand, said racism was a big problem in both surveys.

Why, then, do white Americans’ views on racism and the police seem to be returning to their baseline, but Black Americans’ views remain steady? Well, as media attention turns away from the protests, it may simply be easier for white people to forget about the issue, while the stakes were always greater for Black Americans.

In an analysis of closed captioning data of cable news broadcasts from the TV News Archive,1 we found a huge spike in the number of clips that mentioned “racism” or “Black Lives Matter” as the protests raged during the first two weeks of June. But, as you can see in the chart below, the amount of attention cable news paid to racism and the Black Lives Matter movement has dropped as we’ve moved farther away from peak protest activity. (Coverage of these two issues is still higher than it was prior to Floyd’s death, however.)

This surge and decline in media attention clearly corresponds to changes in public opinion among white Americans, and it’s possible that some of the historic gains we’ve seen in white views of the Black Lives Matter movement might not last.

This drop is not surprising, since we’ve seen it before in how public opinion changes on school shootings, for example. Because media attention on even the most high-profile mass shootings tends to be fleeting, so are these shootings’ effects on public opinion. And now, white Americans’ opinion of the Black Lives Matter movement may be following the same trajectory. That’s driving a decline in overall public support even as Black Americans continue to back the movement at very high rates.

This decline in public opinion is consistent with a long line of political science research that tells us that the effects of events on public opinion tend to last only for as long as they are at the forefront of the country’s — or, in this case, one group’s — collective consciousness. That also means that without prolonged activism and sustained media attention, the impact of this year’s protests on white public opinion could evaporate entirely.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Aug 2020, 7:11 pm

Speaking as a white guy (but not for all white guys), I've seen that the BLM movement has no unified leadership goals; that is, while some people may be identified as leaders, there seems to be no overall consensus as to BLM's goals, their priorities, and how to obtain them.  It's much more complex than the "Malcom X/MLK Jr" dichotomy, but if you look at the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, you will see fragmentation back then that is similar to what BLM is experiencing today.

A second issue is that while BLM leaders and members claim to want whites on board, there seems to be a general attitude of cold indifference toward white presence.  Whether this arises from suspicion of intent and motive of participating whites, outright bigotry against whites, or something stupid that some of the participating whites may have done is unclear -- maybe a combination of mistrust, hatred, and cluelessness all around is closer to the truth.

A third issue may involve current events.  There is a contentious election and a viral pandemic going on, and somehow these two issues just seem more important right now.

Then there is always a possibility of "Causal Fatigue" -- there is only so much effort that people are willing to put into causes that are not their own, and when the causes are slow in being resolved, people simply tend to lose energy and interest.  After all, how many miles can one person march for someone else's pain before they realize their own feet are blistered and swollen?  How much tear gas can one person inhale at someone else's demonstration before they decide they've inhaled enough?  How many times can people get arrested for participating in someone else's unauthorized protest rally before they realize that their police records could keep them from getting jobs?

There are probably more factors -- personal factors -- than I can list here, and certainly more than the journalist has listed in the article quoted above.  Everyone has their own reason for joining, participating in, and leaving a cause, but when it comes to someone else's cause, the better choice may be to simply stay home.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

19 Aug 2020, 7:35 pm

Fnord wrote:
There are probably more factors -- personal factors -- than I can list here, and certainly more than the journalist has listed in the article quoted above.  Everyone has their own reason for joining, participating in, and leaving a cause, but when it comes to someone else's cause, the better choice may be to simply stay home.


Factors such as people seeing the BLM organiser endorsing looting, or seeing the destruction caused to people's private property (or government facilities) - none of which have anything to do with trying to preserve "Black lives", the claimed reason behind the "protests" causing this) - and deciding they no longer wish to be associated with it?

Just because the organistaion behind the protests doesn't explicitly condone certain activities doesn't mean they won't be seen as doing so if they do nothing to prevent them occurring.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

19 Aug 2020, 7:42 pm

Brictoria wrote:
Factors such as people seeing the BLM organizer endorsing looting...
ONE organizer endorsing looting -- "one" is not "all".  There are many organizers in many locations, both black and white.  Otherwise, I cannot argue with the rest of your post...
Brictoria wrote:
... or seeing the destruction caused to people's private property (or government facilities) -- none of which have anything to do with trying to preserve "Black lives", the claimed reason behind the "protests" causing this) -- and deciding they no longer wish to be associated with it.  Just because the organization behind the protests doesn't explicitly condone certain activities doesn't mean they won't be seen as doing so if they do nothing to prevent them occurring.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

19 Aug 2020, 8:36 pm

Fnord wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Factors such as people seeing the BLM organizer endorsing looting...
ONE organizer endorsing looting -- "one" is not "all".  There are many organizers in many locations, both black and white.  Otherwise, I cannot argue with the rest of your post...
Brictoria wrote:
... or seeing the destruction caused to people's private property (or government facilities) -- none of which have anything to do with trying to preserve "Black lives", the claimed reason behind the "protests" causing this) -- and deciding they no longer wish to be associated with it.  Just because the organization behind the protests doesn't explicitly condone certain activities doesn't mean they won't be seen as doing so if they do nothing to prevent them occurring.


Did I claim more than one?

And how many have said this was not endorsed by the group?

Through the lack of action to stop or denounce the statement that are implicitly supporting what was said.