Military brass, National Security leaders that endorse Biden
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,494
Location: Long Island, New York
2 retired 4-star officers who served under Trump endorse Biden
Quote:
Two recently retired four-star officers who served under President Donald Trump have joined a group of nearly 500 national security leaders in endorsing Joe Biden and condemning the commander in chief they served.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
It is Autism Acceptance Month
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
kraftiekortie wrote:
Do you feel Trump is defending the Constitution if he doesn’t step down after losing an election?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
I'm voting Trump but I think he should give up power if he loses.
I suspect not yielding power would force marshall law,a forcible removal that would invite in the military would not be good.
Of coarse Trump does control the military but a presidency can be suspended if the president is acting crazy(25th amendment)
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
kraftiekortie wrote:
Do you feel Trump is defending the Constitution if he doesn’t step down after losing an election?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
Outside of unhinged conspiracy theories, I haven't seen any evidence to show that he won't step down...
True, he has said he may not accept the results, but that does not imply he will not abide by them should he lose. The inane "will you accept the results" questions are designed to cause these sorts of conspiracies: By saying he would accept the results, he would be removing the option to challenge them (think Bush Vs Gore)... By not saying he would accept them, he has left the option to challenge the results. (Besides, there are still a number of people around who have not accepted the last election, complaining that "Hillary won the popular vote", when that was not the aim of the election, and so neither, in theory, were working on a strategy with that goal in mind).
If the reporters were doing their job, they would ask whether he would abide by the results...Absent a "no" to that, claims that he won't step down are worthless.
Brictoria wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Do you feel Trump is defending the Constitution if he doesn’t step down after losing an election?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
Outside of unhinged conspiracy theories, I haven't seen any evidence to show that he won't step down...
True, he has said he may not accept the results, but that does not imply he will not abide by them should he lose. The inane "will you accept the results" questions are designed to cause these sorts of conspiracies: By saying he would accept the results, he would be removing the option to challenge them (think Bush Vs Gore)... By not saying he would accept them, he has left the option to challenge the results. (Besides, there are still a number of people around who have not accepted the last election, complaining that "Hillary won the popular vote", when that was not the aim of the election, and so neither, in theory, were working on a strategy with that goal in mind).
If the reporters were doing their job, they would ask whether he would abide by the results...Absent a "no" to that, claims that he won't step down are worthless.
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
vermontsavant wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Do you feel Trump is defending the Constitution if he doesn’t step down after losing an election?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
Outside of unhinged conspiracy theories, I haven't seen any evidence to show that he won't step down...
True, he has said he may not accept the results, but that does not imply he will not abide by them should he lose. The inane "will you accept the results" questions are designed to cause these sorts of conspiracies: By saying he would accept the results, he would be removing the option to challenge them (think Bush Vs Gore)... By not saying he would accept them, he has left the option to challenge the results. (Besides, there are still a number of people around who have not accepted the last election, complaining that "Hillary won the popular vote", when that was not the aim of the election, and so neither, in theory, were working on a strategy with that goal in mind).
If the reporters were doing their job, they would ask whether he would abide by the results...Absent a "no" to that, claims that he won't step down are worthless.
While possible, there hasn't been any evidence to suggest he will, only assumptions made by the more "partisan" of his oponents.
At this point, it's difficult to decide what would be a better outcome:
Trump wins - punishment for the riots, and vindication following treatment he has received for the past 4 years.
Trump loses and hands over power - Demonstrate how unhinged (and untrustworthy) those claiming that he wouldn't do this were.
The third option (losing and not handing over power), seeems unlikely based on evidence to date...Although if it did occur, it would at least make those claiming this would happen happy, as it would provide what they have been asking for over the past few months with their claims it would happen.
Brictoria wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Do you feel Trump is defending the Constitution if he doesn’t step down after losing an election?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
Outside of unhinged conspiracy theories, I haven't seen any evidence to show that he won't step down...
True, he has said he may not accept the results, but that does not imply he will not abide by them should he lose. The inane "will you accept the results" questions are designed to cause these sorts of conspiracies: By saying he would accept the results, he would be removing the option to challenge them (think Bush Vs Gore)... By not saying he would accept them, he has left the option to challenge the results. (Besides, there are still a number of people around who have not accepted the last election, complaining that "Hillary won the popular vote", when that was not the aim of the election, and so neither, in theory, were working on a strategy with that goal in mind).
If the reporters were doing their job, they would ask whether he would abide by the results...Absent a "no" to that, claims that he won't step down are worthless.
While possible, there hasn't been any evidence to suggest he will, only assumptions made by the more "partisan" of his oponents.
At this point, it's difficult to decide what would be a better outcome:
Trump wins - punishment for the riots, and vindication following treatment he has received for the past 4 years.
Trump loses and hands over power - Demonstrate how unhinged (and untrustworthy) those claiming that he wouldn't do this were.
The third option (losing and not handing over power), seeems unlikely based on evidence to date...Although if it did occur, it would at least make those claiming this would happen happy, as it would provide what they have been asking for over the past few months with their claims it would happen.
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
vermontsavant wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Do you feel Trump is defending the Constitution if he doesn’t step down after losing an election?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
Outside of unhinged conspiracy theories, I haven't seen any evidence to show that he won't step down...
True, he has said he may not accept the results, but that does not imply he will not abide by them should he lose. The inane "will you accept the results" questions are designed to cause these sorts of conspiracies: By saying he would accept the results, he would be removing the option to challenge them (think Bush Vs Gore)... By not saying he would accept them, he has left the option to challenge the results. (Besides, there are still a number of people around who have not accepted the last election, complaining that "Hillary won the popular vote", when that was not the aim of the election, and so neither, in theory, were working on a strategy with that goal in mind).
If the reporters were doing their job, they would ask whether he would abide by the results...Absent a "no" to that, claims that he won't step down are worthless.
While possible, there hasn't been any evidence to suggest he will, only assumptions made by the more "partisan" of his oponents.
At this point, it's difficult to decide what would be a better outcome:
Trump wins - punishment for the riots, and vindication following treatment he has received for the past 4 years.
Trump loses and hands over power - Demonstrate how unhinged (and untrustworthy) those claiming that he wouldn't do this were.
The third option (losing and not handing over power), seeems unlikely based on evidence to date...Although if it did occur, it would at least make those claiming this would happen happy, as it would provide what they have been asking for over the past few months with their claims it would happen.
He certainly has a way of getting those opposed to him to appear that way, however...
kraftiekortie wrote:
Pentagon types have never really liked Trump. They see him as trigger-happy and unstable.
It's not like you to make stuff up.
Trump exits areas, brings troops home, and that makes them angry.
US withdrawing thousands of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your ... his-month/
Trump to Pull 9,500 U.S. Troops Out of Germany, Pentagon Says
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-ne ... of-germany
To Block Trump’s Troop Withdrawals, Congress Turns An Old Tactic Upside Down
https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2020/ ... al/166880/
"A bipartisan group of House lawmakers who want to stop President Donald Trump from pulling U.S. troops from military conflicts and overseas bases "
"Among many mainstream Republicans in Congress, Trump’s myriad withdrawal efforts are deeply unpopular"
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,494
Location: Long Island, New York
vermontsavant wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Do you feel Trump is defending the Constitution if he doesn’t step down after losing an election?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
If he disputes the election, he should step down and let the courts decide the issue.
Do you realize how bad a precedent would be set if he refuses a smooth transfer of power?
Outside of unhinged conspiracy theories, I haven't seen any evidence to show that he won't step down...
True, he has said he may not accept the results, but that does not imply he will not abide by them should he lose. The inane "will you accept the results" questions are designed to cause these sorts of conspiracies: By saying he would accept the results, he would be removing the option to challenge them (think Bush Vs Gore)... By not saying he would accept them, he has left the option to challenge the results. (Besides, there are still a number of people around who have not accepted the last election, complaining that "Hillary won the popular vote", when that was not the aim of the election, and so neither, in theory, were working on a strategy with that goal in mind).
If the reporters were doing their job, they would ask whether he would abide by the results...Absent a "no" to that, claims that he won't step down are worthless.
While possible, there hasn't been any evidence to suggest he will, only assumptions made by the more "partisan" of his oponents.
At this point, it's difficult to decide what would be a better outcome:
Trump wins - punishment for the riots, and vindication following treatment he has received for the past 4 years.
Trump loses and hands over power - Demonstrate how unhinged (and untrustworthy) those claiming that he wouldn't do this were.
The third option (losing and not handing over power), seeems unlikely based on evidence to date...Although if it did occur, it would at least make those claiming this would happen happy, as it would provide what they have been asking for over the past few months with their claims it would happen.
Come January 20,2021 at noon if he has lost meaning the electoral college voted for Biden and congress certified those results and he has not left office the 25th amendment is moot because he would not be President. At that point the secret service is obligated to forcibly remove the security threat in the White House to President Biden. That is still a prescription for people getting killed in the streets, massive self inflicted wound to an already bad economy but the republic would still be standing, shakily but standing. Any other scenario including electors not voting for the winning candidate in their state, congress not certifying the electors votes means the constitution became a useless peace of parchment.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
It is Autism Acceptance Month
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Come January 20,2021 at noon if he has lost meaning the electoral college voted for Biden and congress certified those results and he has not left office the 25th amendment is moot because he would not be President. At that point the secret service is obligated to forcibly remove the security threat in the White House to President Biden. That is still a prescription for people getting killed in the streets, massive self inflicted wound to an already bad economy but the republic would still be standing, shakily but standing. Any other scenario including electors not voting for the winning candidate in their state, congress not certifying the electors votes means the constitution became a useless peace of parchment.
But if declared marshall law and the election a fraud and suspended the constitution,could there be a problem.
I'm not sure how that would be handled in any case it would end bad for Trump and Trump knows that.
Trump would loose in the long run and longer it would take to restore order,the worse punishment on Trump once order is restored.
Trump would be smart to surrender if he loses the election.
I understand your point Aspartofme but could an executive order suspend the election results.
In any case it would end bad for Trump.
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
TheRobotLives wrote:
This article is an endorsement of Trump to know the pro-war/pro-military right is angry at Trump.
Are you dizzy from the spin-doctoring?
What part of the military is known to make threats like Trump? This man tried to start a war in his own country, just to make a buck selling hats.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
House Intelligence Chairman - National Security threat |
14 Feb 2024, 4:18 pm |
GOP endorse neo-Nazi |
01 Mar 2024, 3:57 am |
Safeway security guard |
26 Apr 2024, 7:53 pm |
National Guard Sent to New York Subways |
06 Mar 2024, 8:10 pm |