This would be in my mind like saying 'You don't change nature - nature changes you', to which one could go over all of the technological progress we've made, ways we can genetically engineer mosquitos to stop the spread of Malaria, etc., but then it has to occur to us that we're not separate from nature - we are nature as well and while we can't say that our tools and technologies are phenotypes we can say that culture is something like an extended phenotype and those tools are contents of culture.
I guess I'd fail this test because I see the whole idea of a deistic creator standing outside of its creation and judging it - all the while having rogue angels it screwed up with terrorizing our progress - not only not matching the world we actually live in to any perceivable degree but the whole idea of creating something 'ex nihilo' causally separate from yourself when you are the one cause of all things is incoherent.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.