uncommondenominator wrote:
This completely ignores the content of the affidavit. Don't move too fast, you'll miss important things. You can say whatever you want if you phrase it as "I thought" or "I suspected" or "I believed" - because in those cases they would have to prove you did not actually believe, and that's nearly impossible.
I understand where you're coming from. But they aren't using "I thought", but they are using I seen and this is what happened.
There is even hundreds of them across multiple states. While I haven't looked through each since it's hard to come across the entire list. I've seen enough to see there is a black and white I seen ... I heard ... and so on.
uncommondenominator wrote:
I read the affidavits
Where did you find the complete list of them? Can you link them? Other wise this seems to be a 1 sided you saying random stuff and expecting me/the world to believe you while people are given links back. Like I'm not trying to be mean, but you can say you're a freaking 4 star general for all I care and you have spies looking at it. It means as much as what you just said without any evidence on YOUR behalf.
But as I mention, it's hard to pull all the info together and it would be kind of nice to have a full list. If you can, please link them because even my stuff is a bit iffy since I have to go through news articles that I don't fully trust them
cyberdad wrote:
Ms Melissa Carone was “one of several thousand technicians we hired for a day or two”. Her job at the vote counting centre was to “troubleshoot level one problems for staff”.
A number of years back when Obama was running his 2 term I did the same thing since I was working on one of my degrees and it was I think $200 for a day of training and day of being out there. Same thing too, but different state.
Anyways, in the state I am in we mostly used paper ballots and the IT system was purely in the laptop of pulling their name up and the thing you put the ballot in. During the training we were told legal do and don't. I noticed groups pulling don'ts while I was there, but it wasn't major enough to look like it would change anything. So it's possible she did actually see something.
When I went for some higher degrees which was focused on cyber security. There was entire classes covering unsecure systems like the power plants and voting systems. These are the 2 most vulnerable systems we have today. Like there is even video of a test power plant site that was hacked into to figure out what damage could happen. Lets just say things blown up. And as far as voting systems, many systems are connected to each other in the same room (so they have their own network going on) but they are also connected to something else and that thing is connected to the net. This is a door in itself. And then them being connected in itself is a problem. Infect 1 and you infect all. Many of the higher end ones they were hacked within 7 seconds by people who never seen, touched, or even researched the system prior to (this happened in Defcon, and it's kind of funny).
Anyways, my point is you shouldn't discount her just because she was there just to handle level 1 questions. She was an ass, but she might of easily seen things off. And it should be noted there is NO lvl 2 support in any site at least within my state. They straight up would have to just store the ballots or replace things. Again, at least in my local area they say a list of do and don't, and I can easily see some don'ts going on when I did mine a few years back.
On top of that, the system is so open to corruption and hacking that if not now. At some point someone is going to use it for not legit reasons and it's kind of a good thing to get these systems and policies patched now.
Last edited by Throwawayacccounts on 03 Dec 2020, 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
03 Dec 2020, 6:27 pm
