Treatment of left wing rioters vs pro Trump rioters
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
This post is virtue signaling. As I mentioned in another thread the Trump insurrection is a huge gift to the wokes politically. From now on most any argument that does not deviate from the Trump insurrectionists were treated with kid gloves while left wing protesters were treated with police brutality or worse because the left wingers were black or supported black people while the Trump insurrectionists are white will be viewed as racist. That is just how it is going to be and that is the Trumpists and there enablers own doing.
Ok lets compare. The Trump rioters were not given autonomous zones nor have any MAGA rioters been able to riot 100 straight days.
The Trump rioters did not set afire or try to set afire government buildings unlike left wing ones who tried and some cases burned down police stations.
Unlike the left wing riots nobody has defended the Trump insurrection as a “mostly peaceful” “protest”. Most of the demonstrators were not assaulting the capital building but standing outside on the lawn in the cold all afternoon.
You saw what I did there. I made my point using facts in a simplistic emotional way. That is the same tactic those that show hundreds of armed law enforcement on the capital steps during what is described as BLM protests and comparing that with the almost no show non response at the beginning of the insurrection use.
Drawing conclusions of double standards of the treatment of the insurrectionists in one riot vs treatments protesters in the thousands of violent and non violent left wing protests in the last year is problematic.
As I have said again and again BLM is not just a protest against mistreatment but a revolutionary movement in that it wants to “defund” law enforcement based on a radically different belief in American history. The people who assaulted the capital are revolutionaries for hopefully obvious reasons.
While each situation varies in general riots have been treated too nicely and excuses made for them too often. We are seeing the results.
I am more then furious at the non response to the attack on our capital. This was in my opinion the most serious act of rebellion against US government since the civil war and the revolutionaries should have been treated like the confederates.
I don’t buy the we did not expect this claim. There was endless warnings, we had the precedents of breaches of statehouses and the internet was on fire with talk of storming the capital. There are two plausible explanations for the pathetic response. After a year of blistering criticism, defunding and so on law enforcement is so afraid to look bad they are afraid of their own shadow. Inside job by top law enforcement officials sympathetic to the alt right. I doubt the insurrectionists would have attempted to take over the capital if they had any expatiation at all they would be gunned down like dogs before they got to the top of the steps if not earlier. Why did they have no fear?
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Are you trying to justify an insurrection? As far as the false equivalency you are trying to create, it might be better if you stop cherry picking your "facts." I notice you did not compare the Federal troops and tear gas used on peaceful BLM protestors in DC with the lack of action against the armed occupation of the Michigan Statehouse (which happened early in the summer).
As far as BLM, what is so "revolutionary" about trying to end racism in the police force? You can try to spin this through a right-wing lens, but the fact is more black men die in confrontations with police than other races. You think it is OK to kill an unarmed civilian in broad daylight. Are you saying that a white kid that turns up to a protest with a gun and murders people is perfectly normal? Are you trying to justify all that?
If you think you are going to win any arguments with the "but the other guy does it too" argument, you may want to revisit this. We have serious social problems in this nation. We need to address those problems honestly and stop deflecting because it makes uncomfortable. I deplore violence of any kind. But were is the primary driver?
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
As far as BLM, what is so "revolutionary" about trying to end racism in the police force? You can try to spin this through a right-wing lens, but the fact is more black men die in confrontations with police than other races. You think it is OK to kill an unarmed civilian in broad daylight. Are you saying that a white kid that turns up to a protest with a gun and murders people is perfectly normal? Are you trying to justify all that?
If you think you are going to win any arguments with the "but the other guy does it too" argument, you may want to revisit this. We have serious social problems in this nation. We need to address those problems honestly and stop deflecting because it makes uncomfortable. I deplore violence of any kind. But were is the primary driver?
You missed most of what I was trying to say.
I said the insurrection was the most serious attack on the government since the civil war. That is the opposite of false equivalency. How is saying the insurrectionists should have been treated like the confederates justifying it?
Revolutions come in different forms. A revolution is a replacement in the government or governing system which is usually driven by a belief that something is fundamentally wrong with said system. Revolutions can be mostly peaceful, revolutions can be for righteous reasons. Yes some revolutions are better or worse then others. In my opinion BLM meets the criteria for a revolutionary movement. Defunding the police even using the replace a lot of them with social workers definitions would represent a fundamental change in understanding of that government function. Revolutions often involve a fundamental change in the meaning of language. BLM is driven by what is known as “ Critical Race Theory”. That involves a fundamental change in the primary understanding of American history which explains America now. The previous understanding was America was found for righteous reason and the goals set out were righteous. Racism is explained as the hypocrisy of evil or flawed people. Critical Race Theory posits that America was set up a as a system set up to enslave black people. Today all actions, policies etc must be looked at through the lens of systematic racism. All freedoms granted, reforms made are designed to deflect peoples attention from systematic racism. Even if one agrees that Critical Race Theory is 100 percent correct it still represents a revolutionary change in thought and if implemented revolutionary change.
I judge riots in a similar vain. Some riots are worse that others. That fact is too often used to gaslight people complaining about a particular riot or set of riots for a particular cause. In the long run torching someones store even though that is more violent than what was done to congress is not nearly as harmful as invading the congress to overturn the election. That should not mean that the person pointing out that torching stores is really bad and should be dealt with harshly is making false equivalence to deflect from their racism.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Democracy was a revolutionary idea. One founding principle of our nation was that of continual improvement with no stated end goal beyond the ideas expressed in our Constitution which are broad and contain the idea of the general welfare of the people.
While not as old as democracy, having social workers in the police force is not a new idea. Neither is civil rights. There is no need to replace our existing government to address the problem facing our Black communities. And nothing about the BLM movement, regardless of rhetoric, is suggesting that. They are asking for their rights under law.
Critical Race Theory is just a new framework to an old problem. You can simply read our Constitution to see slavery was acknowledged in it. Racism has been known and discussed since the founding of our nation (we even had a civil war over it). As far as public policy, critical race theory is one way to frame a problem. There are others. It is not a zero sum game. But since Americans have not acknowledged our racist history, critical race theory gives us one way to discuss it.
One thing is certain, we need to address the inequity in our society, and in all parts of our society, not just in the context of race, if we are going to solve the issues facing us. Right now, each group is just trying to deny the issues facing others. We have an economic system that is exploitive and not letting people build a life. We have a racial system that is preventing other from an equal footing.
Violence (rioting) is just the symptom of a problem. I am not condoning violence, but most people don't go and, for example, try to kidnap a governor of a state because there was nothing new on TV. Unfortunately, we think solutions are a zero sum game--the genesis of All Lives Matter. No, you can help one section of society without diminishing another. We can also address more than one thing at a time.
And if we are going to move forward, we need to end our zealous adherence to political ideologies. We need to get away from the only function of society is individual rights and neoliberal economics and start to regain our collective rights and responsibilities. We need a strong public sector.
Bradleigh
Veteran
Joined: 25 May 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,669
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Do you think that there might be a difference between people rightfully upset over police violence that has continued to be unaddressed, with even peaceful protests being treated as evil by the president, and people trying trying to directly interfere with the political system because they are acting on incorrect information that there was an illegitimate election which has been pushed the earlier mentioned president that lost said election?
Not to mention the differences that the police treated the two events. There are reports of police getting selfies with the rioters. Most reports of the BLM protests getting out of control was because of outside forces like the police.
_________________
Through dream I travel, at lantern's call
To consume the flames of a kingdom's fall
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
While not as old as democracy, having social workers in the police force is not a new idea. Neither is civil rights. There is no need to replace our existing government to address the problem facing our Black communities. And nothing about the BLM movement, regardless of rhetoric, is suggesting that. They are asking for their rights under law.
Critical Race Theory is just a new framework to an old problem. You can simply read our Constitution to see slavery was acknowledged in it. Racism has been known and discussed since the founding of our nation (we even had a civil war over it). As far as public policy, critical race theory is one way to frame a problem. There are others. It is not a zero sum game. But since Americans have not acknowledged our racist history, critical race theory gives us one way to discuss it.
One thing is certain, we need to address the inequity in our society, and in all parts of our society, not just in the context of race, if we are going to solve the issues facing us. Right now, each group is just trying to deny the issues facing others. We have an economic system that is exploitive and not letting people build a life. We have a racial system that is preventing other from an equal footing.
Violence (rioting) is just the symptom of a problem. I am not condoning violence, but most people don't go and, for example, try to kidnap a governor of a state because there was nothing new on TV. Unfortunately, we think solutions are a zero sum game--the genesis of All Lives Matter. No, you can help one section of society without diminishing another. We can also address more than one thing at a time.
And if we are going to move forward, we need to end our zealous adherence to political ideologies. We need to get away from the only function of society is individual rights and neoliberal economics and start to regain our collective rights and responsibilities. We need a strong public sector.
Democracy was a revolutionary idea. That is one reason we call it the Revolutionary War.
An idea need not be new to be revolutionary. Critical Race Theory in the current American context is radical change.
As far as the solutions to racial and economic disparities that goes way beyond the scope of this thread.
This thread was a reaction to seeing in most media social and traditional, treatment comparisons being made.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 08 Jan 2021, 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ok lets compare. The Trump rioters were not given autonomous zones
I suspect that the only reason why an "autonomous zone" was allowed to a BLM protest was that enough well-to-do white kids got involved. CHAZ/CHOP was located in a gentrifying neighborhood.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Many cops are sympathetic to far-right causes, whether or not it was an inside job they just don't seem as eager to violently put down a crowd they sympathize with.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Back on twitter before the election, some of the Trump lovers were saying it would be bad if Biden win. Could that have been a doggy whistle for, "We will storm the US Capital and make a big mess in it and there will be so many of us, the police wouldn't be able to stop us."
People are calling this riot "white privilege" because there has not been any police brutality, police have not attacked any of them when they were not doing any riots and were just standing there chanting. No tear gas has been shot out nor any rubber bullets.
I knew things would be bad if either president win and I knew there will be more riots. I looked at the BLM protests and policed brutality on the protesters and it becoming unpeaceful because of the police officers attacking them. Then the Proud Boys joined and start attacking them too and start terrorizing people. I even saw a video online posted by someone who got tail gated and read ended by one of them and the Portland Police did nothing. Yes the Portland police here have been known to be racist. My husband knows this too because he grew up in a black neighborhood so he saw black kids getting harassed by them. When you grow up in a area where the majority are black or even half, you will know what racism looks like because you will grow up seeing it. Then we started getting Trump parades and they would disrupt traffic because of so many of them causing a back up on the road. They would wave their confiderate and Trump flags around on their pick up trucks. Now they were milling around at voter ballet boxes to intimate voters and harass them from their car, even honk at them.
Yes I saw this getting worse. I knew it would be even worse when Trump loses but still be bad when Trump wins. More protests would break out from the BLM and more protests would form and there would be more brutality because Trump lovers would be attacking them as well and it would be very bad, then the left would be painted as violent and no one would bat an eye about the right being violent.
Trump is a dictator and a traitor and this is why he keeps being compared to Hitler and his minions being compared to Nazis. He wants to rule our country. His minions want to rule our country so they are trying. I think it will get worse because there will be fights to help defend the US capital and the congress. This is already being compared to War of 1812.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
People are calling this riot "white privilege" because there has not been any police brutality, police have not attacked any of them when they were not doing any riots and were just standing there chanting. No tear gas has been shot out nor any rubber bullets.
I knew things would be bad if either president win and I knew there will be more riots. I looked at the BLM protests and policed brutality on the protesters and it becoming unpeaceful because of the police officers attacking them. Then the Proud Boys joined and start attacking them too and start terrorizing people. I even saw a video online posted by someone who got tail gated and read ended by one of them and the Portland Police did nothing. Yes the Portland police here have been known to be racist. My husband knows this too because he grew up in a black neighborhood so he saw black kids getting harassed by them. When you grow up in a area where the majority are black or even half, you will know what racism looks like because you will grow up seeing it. Then we started getting Trump parades and they would disrupt traffic because of so many of them causing a back up on the road. They would wave their confiderate and Trump flags around on their pick up trucks. Now they were milling around at voter ballet boxes to intimate voters and harass them from their car, even honk at them.
Yes I saw this getting worse. I knew it would be even worse when Trump loses but still be bad when Trump wins. More protests would break out from the BLM and more protests would form and there would be more brutality because Trump lovers would be attacking them as well and it would be very bad, then the left would be painted as violent and no one would bat an eye about the right being violent.
Trump is a dictator and a traitor and this is why he keeps being compared to Hitler and his minions being compared to Nazis. He wants to rule our country. His minions want to rule our country so they are trying. I think it will get worse because there will be fights to help defend the US capital and the congress. This is already being compared to War of 1812.
I agree that that at this point the “cycle of violence” is baked in enough that no matter who won things would have continued escalating until one side won or both sides got exhausted.
That said if Trump won it would have been a lot worse.
The insurrection failed, Biden is going to be President. The constitution was set up with a system of checks and balances. That system suffered a lot of damage but it held. The judiciary blocked him at every turn. Federalism played its part as state election officials and poll workers did their jobs despite death threats.
If Trump won despite intense non stop opposition that used a multitude tactics there would be two reactions. A portion of the left would say nothing to lose and move beyond rioting further alienating the mainstream. The other portion of the left would be dispirited seeing Trump as an unbeatable magic man, of knowing things they don’t and never will. Trump and the alt right being the bullies they are would pick up on that becoming more convinced of their righteousness and much more emboldened. There would have been one Kristallnacht type event after another. Trump would feel free to purge out anybody that is not a yes person. The government would become way more non functional than now
Would have the system of checks balances, federalism, and democracy survived in some form?. Questionable. Would it have been Nazi Germany 2.0?. No.
1. Trump is too incompetent to pull that off.
2. Trump does not pathologically hate groups like Hitler. It is all about humiliating them not murdering them.
3. Trump has no interest in militarily conquering the world. Owning it is probably another story.
While not Nazi Germany 2.0 it would have been an unbearable nightmare.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Bradleigh
Veteran
Joined: 25 May 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,669
Location: Brisbane, Australia
What are you basing this on? The so called Left wing riots are either happening in poor areas where people are desperate and thus you have opportunists who are looting and stuff, are direct results of injustices performed by the state that were essentially state sponsored executions, or further pushed by the police to have excuses to crack down. Assuming riots would be worse if Trump won is just conjecture. There is no evidence that Left wing protests would have stormed the capitol building to stop the proceedings. While the Right wing only just recently had such examples, where they stormed government buildings to try and stop lockdowns, while armed.
These are false equivalences, like comparing the civil rights protests to the sorts of protests you expect with people who are neo Nazis, nationalists and the type to wave confederate flags. The propaganda against the civil rights movement were the same back then.
_________________
Through dream I travel, at lantern's call
To consume the flames of a kingdom's fall
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
What are you basing this on? The so called Left wing riots are either happening in poor areas where people are desperate and thus you have opportunists who are looting and stuff, are direct results of injustices performed by the state that were essentially state sponsored executions, or further pushed by the police to have excuses to crack down. Assuming riots would be worse if Trump won is just conjecture. There is no evidence that Left wing protests would have stormed the capitol building to stop the proceedings. While the Right wing only just recently had such examples, where they stormed government buildings to try and stop lockdowns, while armed.
These are false equivalences, like comparing the civil rights protests to the sorts of protests you expect with people who are neo Nazis, nationalists and the type to wave confederate flags. The propaganda against the civil rights movement were the same back then.

Funny you should focus on how the left would react in my alternate history when half of the post is about how the Trumpers would react. There are no equivalences or judgements in that paragraph, it is a prediction of a hypothetical situation. Since you want to focus on the left first I said nothing about the left storming the capital, I did not mention any specific reaction just that it would go beyond rioting. I based it on how some elements of the anti war movement reacted when they did not get the reaction they expected they moved on to bombings. As far as becoming dispirited that is a natural reaction to repeated failures to stop people from bullying you. One starts to feel there is nothing you can do the bully has some ability that you will never be able to figure out a way to successfully counter, a feeling I assume most in this board have felt in our lifetimes. In the 70s moving inward to self fulfillment movements. But this is not the 70s and I do not know how a 2020s version would exactly play out so I felt it best to keep it very general.
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
Bradleigh
Veteran
Joined: 25 May 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,669
Location: Brisbane, Australia
What bombings?
_________________
Through dream I travel, at lantern's call
To consume the flames of a kingdom's fall
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
What bombings?
I'm guessing these bombings:
https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-case ... d-bombings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_U ... activities
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Would have the system of checks balances, federalism, and democracy survived in some form?. Questionable. Would it have been Nazi Germany 2.0?. No.
1. Trump is too incompetent to pull that off.
This has been the basis of my argument: "There will be no coup".
He doesn't have the influence, and it was good to see Pence dismissing the trumpian nonsense.
In Americas 200 year history we have never had a civil war, we never trampled on people's rights, we never put people in concentration camps without due process, we have never terrorized communities with violence, or enslaved a single human being. And we certainly have not had a sitting president incite violence to attempt to overturn a democratic election.
Well, we can dream can't we...
Democracy is a fragile system. Ignorance and hate are the enemies.
