Fnord wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
Chauvin was doing what he was trained to do...
... and he was "only following orders" too.
"Befehl ist Befehl." (literally, "An order is an order.") -- the Nuremburg DefenseThe only issue with your quip Fnord is that following orders that are immoral only indicts the perpetrator on moral grounds, but can't do so on legal grounds within a domestic jurisdiction.
The Nuremberg trials were a foreign invading force imposing international justice on actions that can't be justified by orders given by a vanquished power. Had the same regime that gave the orders prosecuted the Nazis for war crimes that resulted from said orders, that would be more equivalent.
Not saying this to absolve Chauvin BTW. I still consider Chauvin a dirty scumbag, however even if he was the worst scumbag on earth convicting him for following training he was given is an entirely different matter than assaying his otherwise impeachable moral failings
_________________
"One often meets his destiny on the road he takes to avoid it."
Master Oogway