Redd_Kross wrote:
Changes of leadership outside of a general election are interesting, as the parties sometimes go for the candidate they'd really like irrespective of whether they'd be vote-winners. It's an opportunity to temporarily get more extreme people into power than the electorate might otherwise tolerate, and force some legislation through.
With that in mind, Sunak seems like a natural shoe-in as he's an uber Tory - completely obsessed with favouring himself at everybody else's expense. That will appeal to the biggest party donors as he's one of their own. And as his policies will favour himself they'll also favour them. Which means in turn he'll be very receptive to their nest-feathering suggestions too.
Yes have you noticed that the Tories have changed leaders without a general election since 2016 now? The back door way of staying in power: the leader resigns, the Tory party members (0.2% of the population) vote for a new one. Then, when the Tories are sure of themselves, they hold a general election to get confirmation. That is the wrong way round.
About Sunak- he would also be a favourable choice because he is a person of colour. The Tories will be able to say 'look at us. Look at how diverse and open minded we are.' But Sunak won't make them any more caring or benevolent to the general voting public, he's a token.
Having said that, maybe the Tory party members are more racist than I thought and will vote for Truss, the white candidate!
_________________
That alien woman. On Earth to observe and wonder about homo sapiens.