The_Walrus wrote:
No doubt Trump will have come under more fire by the time he leaves the White House (unless he suddenly resigns in the next few months, in which case he'll have probably come under more within a couple of years after the inevitable inquiries), but Obama received plenty of criticism from the American media and political class - certainly far more than a twelfth of what Trump gets. Obviously it's hard to quantify, but a large section of the American people are behind Trump completely while a lot of Obama's supporters still criticised him. I would suggest that Trump is probably 2-3 times more criticised than Obama, and that's simply a reflection of the gulf in competency.
There's a world of difference between receiving "plenty" of criticism and having significant portions of the media - in cahoots with your political foes in D.C. - pushing conspiracy theories, manufacturing false reports and evidence in a deliberate bid to dislodge something, anything, no matter how tiny or deeply hidden, whatever it takes, to forcibly bring about an impeachment.
I was hoping Trump would be given a chance to win me over during his first year in charge. He's spent the majority of it, thus far, dodging bullets. If anything, the vitriol being aimed at him, along with the persistent "investigations", is turning me off from his persecutors, not the man himself.
Quote:
There's a big gap internationally, where Trump might actually be getting somewhere in the region of 12 times as much criticism, but that's not really relevant - only Americans elect presidents.
And Americans, as we all know, never so much as consider the opinions of non-Americans, right?
US citizens already voted, despite the "regressive's" inability to accept the outcome. Suggesting opinions around the world are irrelevant during his tenure is utter testicles.