Farm Subsidies Harm Taxpayers, Consumers, and Farmers

Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

Honey69
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,263
Location: Llareggub

27 Aug 2023, 2:58 pm

https://www.heritage.org/agriculture/re ... d%20supply.

Quote:

...current U.S. farm policies serve no legitimate purpose. They burden American families with higher taxes and higher food prices. They harm small farmers by excluding them from subsidies, raising land prices, and financing farm consolidation. They increase trade barriers that reduce incomes in America and in lesser-developed countries. They are falsely promoted as saving the family farm and protecting the food supply. In reality, they are America's largest corporate welfare program...

...Farm subsidies are intended to alleviate farmer poverty, but the majority of subsidies go to commercial farms with average incomes of $200,000 and net worths of nearly $2 million.

Farm subsidies are intended to raise farmer incomes by remedying low crop prices. Instead, they promote overproduction and therefore lower prices further.

Farm subsidies are intended to help struggling family farmers. Instead, they harm them by excluding them from most subsidies, financing the consolidation of family farms, and raising land values to levels that prevent young people from entering farming.

Farm subsidies are intended to be consumer-friendly and taxpayer-friendly. Instead, they cost Americans billions each year in higher taxes and higher food costs.

Lawmakers would be hard-pressed to enact a set of policies that are more destructive to farmers, taxpayers, and consumers than the current farm policies. ...


_________________
"We are all gonna die." --Senator Joni Ernst


Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,604
Location: New York City (Queens)

28 Aug 2023, 12:52 am

I think farm subsidies should perhaps be reformed but not eliminated entirely. Subsidies should be contingent on good soil conservation practices, if they aren't already. Also, IMO, big agribusiness companies should not get subsidized as much as small farmers.


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.


traven
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Sep 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 15,241

28 Aug 2023, 1:00 am

but, but.... think about the banks :mrgreen:



Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,032
Location: Texas

28 Aug 2023, 5:43 am

Honey69 wrote:
https://www.heritage.org/agriculture/report/how-farm-subsidies-harm-taxpayers-consumers-and-farmers-too#:~:text=They%20harm%20small%20farmers%20by,and%20protecting%20the%20food%20supply.

Quote:

...current U.S. farm policies serve no legitimate purpose. They burden American families with higher taxes and higher food prices. They harm small farmers by excluding them from subsidies, raising land prices, and financing farm consolidation. They increase trade barriers that reduce incomes in America and in lesser-developed countries. They are falsely promoted as saving the family farm and protecting the food supply. In reality, they are America's largest corporate welfare program...

...Farm subsidies are intended to alleviate farmer poverty, but the majority of subsidies go to commercial farms with average incomes of $200,000 and net worths of nearly $2 million.

Farm subsidies are intended to raise farmer incomes by remedying low crop prices. Instead, they promote overproduction and therefore lower prices further.

Farm subsidies are intended to help struggling family farmers. Instead, they harm them by excluding them from most subsidies, financing the consolidation of family farms, and raising land values to levels that prevent young people from entering farming.

Farm subsidies are intended to be consumer-friendly and taxpayer-friendly. Instead, they cost Americans billions each year in higher taxes and higher food costs.

Lawmakers would be hard-pressed to enact a set of policies that are more destructive to farmers, taxpayers, and consumers than the current farm policies. ...


Personally I wish Congress would eliminate virtually all subsidies but that wont ever happen.I wish we could eliminate all subsidies so we could have much more simple and fair tax code where everyone played by the same rules.



Honey69
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,263
Location: Llareggub

28 Aug 2023, 7:30 pm

The farm subsidies aren't going to go away. The Republican Party is dependent on the farm states. And, the Democrats aren't going to propose eliminating the subsidies.


_________________
"We are all gonna die." --Senator Joni Ernst


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

02 Sep 2023, 4:24 am

I agree with Mona. Don't subside food production. However, there should be a gradual switch towards subsidising good environmental land management - soils, habitats, water, and emissions reduction. Create incentives to do good things that the current market doesn't properly support.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,484
Location: Aux Arcs

02 Sep 2023, 11:13 am

Some are conservation based.
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-init ... al-quality


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,157
Location: Adelaide, Australia

03 Sep 2023, 2:50 am

Honey69 wrote:
The farm subsidies aren't going to go away. The Republican Party is dependent on the farm states. And, the Democrats aren't going to propose eliminating the subsidies.

The anti-welfare party won't stop handing out welfare.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short