Medical transition should be free and mandatory

Page 4 of 7 [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

What_in_the_what_now
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Gender: Female
Posts: 105

27 Jan 2024, 9:08 am

funeralxempire wrote:
Yugoslav1945 wrote:
2. I still disagree that mandatory transition is too extreme. Firstly, you would not want an underaged person to go through that so it is for the best that adults who are trans have the priority. Children can wait for their turn once they turn 18. Secondly, a trans person has gender dysphoria which is why they are trans since they are questioning the validity of their current body that doesn't match with their soul. Lastly, trans people are often misgendered due to their body appearance and it is necessary and understandable that such pain cannot last long so it is mandatory that trans people go through medical transition and hormone replacement therapy.


None of that amounts to a justification for forcing people to receive surgery.

There's no case where forcing someone to receive surgery is reasonable.


There are nearly 50 million trans people around the world (about 0.6% of World Population), so it is not too late to help them get the treatment they need in order to improve their well-being and decrease suicide rates (in the US, more than 40% of trans adults have attempted suicide). We still have time!

Source

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/transpop-suicide-press-release/[/quote]

You're still not making a case for forcing people to receive surgery, vs. the better option of making it available voluntarily for people who might need it.

It's not even that you're failing to make a good case, you're not making a case whatsoever.[/quote]


Trans people have high suicide rates! Either we should intervene and invest as much money as we can as early as possible or face a new coming global crisis. We are already having hundreds of millions of people being hungry and without clean water, and now we have loads of lonely people, and then we have a lot of trans people committing suicide. If the goal of an agenda is to achieve something by a certain time period then it should be done without goofing around. I genuinely cannot believe how the capitalist system can be so greedy and selfish when we have enough money in the world to make an efficient teamwork effort into investing it to solve these persistent global issues that may greatly hinder our progress if not dealt with sooner![/quote]

Forced surgery doesn't directly address suicide rates.
Further, whatever positive contributions forced surgery might make can be achieved by voluntary surgery.

I don't get why you're so hung-up on authoritarian solutions to issues. What benefits come from the state forcing people vs. allowing people to make the choice to pursue surgical solutions?

How will making reassignment mandatory be better than having the patient make the final decision about their medical choices?

How will you deal with people who have anxieties over major surgery, will you force them to undergo surgery anyways?[/quote]

This feels like the underpinning of some socialist ideas, things become mandatory for the greater good. Although they keep saying offer and mandatory. Despite the requests for clarity. It doesnt feel, to me, like these are self induced thoughts but some rhetoric that resonated and they cannot see the deep flaws in it.

The suicide rates are high? Evidence offer is "attempts at suicide" which include "thoughts of" from people engaged in a leading survey. I'm not claiming its not an issue but the sources of such strong positions with the OP are seemingly nonsensical because they don't marry with reality. There appears to be ill formed opinions based on data they wanted to hear and proper scrutiny has not been applied. Likely with the same voracity in which they may apply scrutiny to seemingly contradictory evidence.

The interactions between yourselves seem to be descending into "you just dont get it" as if you knew what they knew (believed) you would only conclude the same way.

Despite your best attempts at clarity, it appears to be a monologue not a dialogue



Yugoslav1945
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2023
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Posts: 563
Location: Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

27 Jan 2024, 9:08 am

funeralxempire wrote:
If you're opposed to forcing people to undergo such procedures against their will you're by definition not in favour of making such procedures mandatory. One minute you're comparing your plan with conscription, the next you're insisting you're not in favour of forcing people. Make up your mind.


It is true! I want every trans person to transition as quick as possible. But what you do is claim how there are trans people who think that they would be "forced against their will" when the concept of transgender is to transition. Why? So that their body appearance won't discriminate against them. And even if there is someone who claims that it is being "forced against their will", it will not hinder the process and we will still achieve lower suicide rates by helping these poor people find the light at the end of the tunnel.

It is mandatory for the purpose that we cannot wait anymore! And because I believe that a trans person is supposed to transition to avoid being misgendered, then we should do this for the sake of helping the very small trans population in this entire planet.


_________________
"In a socialist society such phenomena must and will disappear. In the old Yugoslavia national oppression by the great-Serb capitalist clique meant strengthening the economic exploitation of the oppressed peoples. This is the inevitable fate of all who suffer from national oppression."

- Josip Broz Tito (Ljubljana, 1948)


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,332
Location: temperate zone

27 Jan 2024, 9:09 am

Fnord wrote:
By the OP's reasoning, ALL "corrective" procedures should be both free and mandatory.

So if someone does not like my lack of hair, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to put hair on my head.

Or if someone thinks my nose is the wrong shape, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to change the shape of my nose.

That's taking some of the premises of Orwell's "1984" or Huxley's "Brave New World" a little too far.


Well...whats wrong with that?

I think that everyone in America (except me)male or female.. should be forced at gunpoint into the hospital...to be surgically transformed into a clone of Claudia Schiffer!

And the taxpayer should pay for it!

I mean...is that asking too much?

:lol:



Yugoslav1945
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2023
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Posts: 563
Location: Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

27 Jan 2024, 9:11 am

What_in_the_what_now wrote:
The suicide rates are high? Evidence offer is "attempts at suicide" which include "thoughts of" from people engaged in a leading survey. I'm not claiming its not an issue but the sources of such strong positions with the OP are seemingly nonsensical because they don't marry with reality. There appears to be ill formed opinions based on data they wanted to hear and proper scrutiny has not been applied. Likely with the same voracity in which they may apply scrutiny to seemingly contradictory evidence.


That is the problem. Over 40% of trans people in America attempted suicide because of the failure of the system to just help them transition. This is a warning sign that things can get worse if we do not take radical action towards bringing down the growing suicide rates!


_________________
"In a socialist society such phenomena must and will disappear. In the old Yugoslavia national oppression by the great-Serb capitalist clique meant strengthening the economic exploitation of the oppressed peoples. This is the inevitable fate of all who suffer from national oppression."

- Josip Broz Tito (Ljubljana, 1948)


What_in_the_what_now
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Gender: Female
Posts: 105

27 Jan 2024, 9:16 am

[/quote]

So not only do we see transphobia from misgendering but also when you have politically-aligned medical staff who refuse to offer such care which only increases such stigma. I think we need to get rid of such bias that can cause unwanted bigotry. The article mentions that Obamacare in 2016 clarified that such discrimination is illegal.[/quote]

"Politically aligned medical staff"

What does this mean? Are there right and wrong politically aligned medical staff? Forcing transition is the right alignment?



Yugoslav1945
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2023
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Posts: 563
Location: Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

27 Jan 2024, 9:18 am

What_in_the_what_now wrote:

"Politically aligned medical staff"

What does this mean? Are there right and wrong politically aligned medical staff? Forcing transition is the right alignment?


Didn't you read the article? Trans people were discriminated also by the politically conservative beliefs of the staff. The Obama administration in 2016 had to reassure them that such discrimination wasn't tolerable.


_________________
"In a socialist society such phenomena must and will disappear. In the old Yugoslavia national oppression by the great-Serb capitalist clique meant strengthening the economic exploitation of the oppressed peoples. This is the inevitable fate of all who suffer from national oppression."

- Josip Broz Tito (Ljubljana, 1948)


What_in_the_what_now
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Gender: Female
Posts: 105

27 Jan 2024, 9:20 am

Fnord wrote:
By the OP's reasoning, ALL "corrective" procedures should be both free and mandatory.

So if someone does not like my lack of hair, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to put hair on my head.

Or if someone thinks my nose is the wrong shape, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to change the shape of my nose.

That's taking some of the premises of Orwell's "1984" or Huxley's "Brave New World" a little too far.


ABA, ECT and chelation back not to mention no cheese.



What_in_the_what_now
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Gender: Female
Posts: 105

27 Jan 2024, 9:24 am

Yugoslav1945 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Yugoslav1945 wrote:

Yugoslav1945 wrote:
It may but it would be too slow and painful.

funeralxempire wrote:
Why would that be? :scratch:

1. Because it will decrease suicide rates at a lower level.


Your answer is a non-sequitur.

Yugoslav1945 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Ideally, the people who desire surgery should receive it before anyone who doesn't want it, no?

2. Ideally, yes. We cannot ignore the actual disabled people who really need it so we have to respect those priorities but still, everyone will have an opportunity for such.


The only people who need such an opportunity are people who desire it. For those who don't, it's not an opportunity.

Yugoslav1945 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
This is an attempt at emotional manipulation, nothing more.

3. That's what you are gonna deal with when having civil discussions and arguments with people. It's one of the tools to convincing people.


Emotional manipulation is a bad faith tactic and should be identified as such. If it's all you have, you have nothing.

Yugoslav1945 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
The problem is that you're not proposing a good plan of any sort. You're proposing a bad plan executed violently and hoping that no one will notice that it's not a good plan.

4. How is it a "bad plan"? We are talking about resolving a very serious situation. Maybe you have something to say but you already have and that is volunteer service when I cannot stand having to see a very slow decline in suicide rates. I want a drastic decrease in such because suicide is the last thing you want a poor man or woman to do to themselves.


How is it a bad plan? you ask, while failing to offer any solid argument that it's a good plan.

It's a waste of resources to force people who don't wish to undergo surgery to be forced to undergo surgery anyways.

Forced surgeries are a clear violation of patient's rights.

Nothing about making surgical transitions mandatory is better than making it so anyone who wants one can pursue one and so far you've offered poor reasons and non-sequiturs for why you think making them mandatory would be preferable.


funeralxempire wrote:
Your answer is a non-sequitur.


1. But you don't get to have a lot of trans people transitioning if it is voluntary service. Think of a conscription. Countries usually have voluntary or mandatory service in the army but in dire times when a war is raging against them, they will force mobilizations of men because they want to protect themselves against the invaders and attack them. Ukraine was able to field defense to counter the Russian advance to Kyiv with help from the West.

funeralxempire wrote:
The only people who need such an opportunity are people who desire it. For those who don't, it's not an opportunity.


2. The definition of transgender is that it "is a broad term that can be used to describe people whose gender identity is different from the gender they were thought to be when they were born." (https://transequality.org/issues/resources/understanding-transgender-people-the-basics). It would be depressing for a trans person to not have any faith in their transgender if they don't think they want to transition because they would be forever stuck to the morbid reality of transphobia. Why refuse them the opportunity if their goal is to no longer be discriminated by ultimately changing their body appearance from the current gender to the gender they want to be.

funeralxempire wrote:
It's a waste of resources to force people who don't wish to undergo surgery to be forced to undergo surgery anyways.


3. That's like saying that it is a waste of resources to give people food and clean water. I don't know about you but a trans person's main purpose is to get rid of their unwanted body that is causing them emotional pain and they need to complete their transition journey in order to achieve peace and harmony as it was stated in the 2015 study where people who transitioned reported lower rates of suicidal feelings while people who detransitioned had higher rates of suicidal feelings. No one is being "forced against their will". They WANT freedom and acceptance!


https://study.com/learn/lesson/false-an ... comparison.



What_in_the_what_now
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Gender: Female
Posts: 105

27 Jan 2024, 9:27 am

naturalplastic wrote:
Fnord wrote:
By the OP's reasoning, ALL "corrective" procedures should be both free and mandatory.

So if someone does not like my lack of hair, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to put hair on my head.

Or if someone thinks my nose is the wrong shape, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to change the shape of my nose.

That's taking some of the premises of Orwell's "1984" or Huxley's "Brave New World" a little too far.


Well...whats wrong with that?

I think that everyone in America (except me)male or female.. should be forced at gunpoint into the hospital...to be surgically transformed into a clone of Claudia Schiffer!

And the taxpayer should pay for it!

I mean...is that asking too much?

:lol:


Which Claudia Schiffer?



What_in_the_what_now
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Gender: Female
Posts: 105

27 Jan 2024, 9:28 am

Yugoslav1945 wrote:
What_in_the_what_now wrote:

"Politically aligned medical staff"

What does this mean? Are there right and wrong politically aligned medical staff? Forcing transition is the right alignment?


Didn't you read the article? Trans people were discriminated also by the politically conservative beliefs of the staff. The Obama administration in 2016 had to reassure them that such discrimination wasn't tolerable.


Did you read my question? Or do you think the article can only be interpreted one way?



Yugoslav1945
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2023
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Posts: 563
Location: Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

27 Jan 2024, 9:31 am

What_in_the_what_now wrote:
Yugoslav1945 wrote:
What_in_the_what_now wrote:

"Politically aligned medical staff"

What does this mean? Are there right and wrong politically aligned medical staff? Forcing transition is the right alignment?


Didn't you read the article? Trans people were discriminated also by the politically conservative beliefs of the staff. The Obama administration in 2016 had to reassure them that such discrimination wasn't tolerable.


Did you read my question? Or do you think the article can only be interpreted one way?


As for that last one you made. Yes. I believe that "forcing transition" is the right choice because how can a trans person live a happy life without transitioning and legally changing their gender? For too long they're being oppressed and misgendered! The time has come for a serious change and we need it!


_________________
"In a socialist society such phenomena must and will disappear. In the old Yugoslavia national oppression by the great-Serb capitalist clique meant strengthening the economic exploitation of the oppressed peoples. This is the inevitable fate of all who suffer from national oppression."

- Josip Broz Tito (Ljubljana, 1948)


Yugoslav1945
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2023
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Posts: 563
Location: Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

27 Jan 2024, 10:19 am

It is what I feel that should be done as to probably prevent me from even looking and thinking of my former trans friend as female if they identify as a male and don't like being treated like a female. I have done too much wrong assumptions of my own family and them, and I learned it the hard way when our friendship turned out to be a rollercoaster ride.

Never again will I misgender them because they will one day have free medical transition, and they will legally change gender and I will at that time be with some other girl who isn't trans.


_________________
"In a socialist society such phenomena must and will disappear. In the old Yugoslavia national oppression by the great-Serb capitalist clique meant strengthening the economic exploitation of the oppressed peoples. This is the inevitable fate of all who suffer from national oppression."

- Josip Broz Tito (Ljubljana, 1948)


IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 69,245
Location: Chez Quis

27 Jan 2024, 11:46 am

Would all surgeries be free?
What about cancer patients who will otherwise die?


_________________
And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.


Yugoslav1945
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2023
Age: 19
Gender: Male
Posts: 563
Location: Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

27 Jan 2024, 11:49 am

IsabellaLinton wrote:
Would all surgeries be free?
What about cancer patients who will otherwise die?


Usually this is a topic regarding the issue of trans people. All I can tell is that all surgeries would be free and that cancer patients like every other disabled patient has priority. We can't have them waiting for too long.


_________________
"In a socialist society such phenomena must and will disappear. In the old Yugoslavia national oppression by the great-Serb capitalist clique meant strengthening the economic exploitation of the oppressed peoples. This is the inevitable fate of all who suffer from national oppression."

- Josip Broz Tito (Ljubljana, 1948)


IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 69,245
Location: Chez Quis

27 Jan 2024, 11:58 am

Ideally, I think all non-elective surgeries for all people should be free.
I grew up in Canada where that was the norm.
All surgeries were free except things deemed cosmetic.
One of my family members had a free gender-confirmation surgery.


_________________
And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,332
Location: temperate zone

27 Jan 2024, 12:08 pm

What_in_the_what_now wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Fnord wrote:
By the OP's reasoning, ALL "corrective" procedures should be both free and mandatory.

So if someone does not like my lack of hair, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to put hair on my head.

Or if someone thinks my nose is the wrong shape, the government can force me to undergo surgical procedures to change the shape of my nose.

That's taking some of the premises of Orwell's "1984" or Huxley's "Brave New World" a little too far.


Well...whats wrong with that?

I think that everyone in America (except me)male or female.. should be forced at gunpoint into the hospital...to be surgically transformed into a clone of Claudia Schiffer!

And the taxpayer should pay for it!

I mean...is that asking too much?

:lol:


Which Claudia Schiffer?


There is only one.