Awesomelyglorious wrote:
ed wrote:
Anubis wrote:
System: Authoritarianism
Now why doesn't that surprise me?

Actually, what is more surprising is that I used to either be in his position or more extreme than it. I think a major difference though is that I don't have as many left wing tendencies as I did have authoritarian ones.
Hmmm.
What would you call "authoritarian"?
I'm not for intruding on individual freedoms except as a matter of security, justice, and safety.
I'm also wondering if my position on cannabis is well-placed. I view most recreational drugs as symbols of decadence and despair. But such a stance on cannabis may be contradictory and unfair. Considering that I think smoking tobacco should be gradually banned, but alcohol should remain legal, what is there against legalising cannabis if it's only a small minority who suffer bad side effects? (pending further evidence for or against). Something like a general health warning on packets of the stuff ought to suffice, along with a reasonable price for the legal supplies. If withdrawing from whatever international conventions on narcotics is neccessary, then so be it. The nasty drugs would still remain illegal. And the use of cannabis wouldn't exactly be promoted, either. It would only be the choice presented without forcing people to go underground to get such things. Perhaps a trial period of 2-5 years, then a final review on the subject. 18+ minimum age, as well. However, I'm not certain either way.
_________________
Lalalalai.... I'll cut you up!