Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Legato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 822

01 Apr 2008, 2:52 pm

The universe was created in a battle between Space Mushrooms and Time Ninjas.

/discuss



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

01 Apr 2008, 2:59 pm

Really I think what really proves our case is Incompetent Design. I mean, really, how many things are designed well from the chaos of battle? Not many. This is why penguins can't fly, platypuses are so funny looking, and why most people are so stupid. Incompetent design theorists have been carefully analyzing all of the features of creatures and recognize that so many of them suck that an evolutionary process isn't possible. :wink:



Legato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 822

01 Apr 2008, 3:03 pm

Well put, for indeed the catacalysmic and hallucinogenic results of the raging cosmic battle did create such moot and broken creatures. Speaking of moot and broken, don't even get me started on Pluto.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

01 Apr 2008, 3:05 pm

From another thread, I wrote this:

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Maybe the aliens would be like the ones on Event Horizon?
Or maybe the ones in That Hideous Strength?

Who would know? This is what science fiction lives off of: ignorance and speculation.


On earth for a given surface area, whether in a desert or an ocean, you shall most likely find something that is alive. Increase the surface area and you increase your chances of finding life on Earth. Can this be cogently induced to hold true for the cosmos?

Think of the factors involved with our planet:

93 million miles +/- 2% radius of orbit around a star of Sols' magnitude and composition.
Rotation of 24 hours +/- 10 minutes for even heating
23.7 degree axial tilt causing the change of seasons
Greenhouse effect to absorb solar energy
21% O2, 78% N2, 1% for all other gases which include O3 and CO2
Moon causing tides
Jupiter influencing the asteroid belt
Location away from the center of galaxy; non proximity to black holes and pulsars etcetera.

Even if a planet like ours existed, does life occur by chance?

For the simplest molecule of ribonuclease there are 124 amino acids of 17 different types arranged in a specific order. Limiting to a soup of just these 17, the odds of this molecule occurring by chance are 17^-124 or 1 out of 3.8e152.

There are proteins with more than 10,000 amino acids and more variety of them in specific order and folded precisely. What are the odds of that by random chance?

DNA and RNA take away the randomness of protein building, but how did they come about?

Paley's argument and philosophical naturalism

Finding a watch in the desert, without knowing what one is, you could come to one of two conclusions:

1. Since all of the elements in the watch are also found in the desert, you might conclude that watches naturally are formed in the desert by random collisions of sand, cactus, and tumbleweeds.

Or

2. Examining the inside of the watch you might be forced to make another conclusion; seeing the gears, spring, various mechanisms in a put together in such a way as to be statistically improbable to occur by chance, you might rightly conclude that someone designed and built the watch. From there you may even figure out its purpose of keeping time and how to operate it.

Looking at the Earth and life that exists here, with the conditions being right to support life and life itself being in so many ways advanced technology, practically nanotechnology, electronics, optics, computers, solar arrays, sensors, etc, the idea that it all came about and is currently existing without a designer, or "naturally" is ludicrous.

Why can't we make the conclusion of life and the universe having a designer? Not for lack of data, that's for sure, but because of an a priori assumption that everything occurs naturally. However, is that scientific to hold to an a priori model after it has been shown to be unsupported by the data? No, but that is what happens in the world of academia for philosophical reasons.

So, back to the question about aliens, or rather other sentient beings. Biblically God made other beings, angels. Most are good and some are malevolent, i.e. the fallen ones. Do they live on other planets? I don't think so, I think they are here. So to answer your question, I think "aliens" do exist, but they are the kind in C.S. Lewis's That Hideous Strength and the movie Event Horizon.



Legato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 822

01 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm

Your Intelligent Design-esque post belongs in this ridiculous and satirical thread. I personally think Space Mushrooms and Time Ninjas seems more probable.

Also man, before you start spouting off numbers (see "Limiting to a soup of just these 17, the odds of this molecule occurring by chance are 17^-124 or 1 out of 3.8e152."), assessing probabilities of methods we do not currently understand. How this probability came about and what factors are considered are imperitive to using this in a debate.

Now, to assess ridiculous probability, there was a man in s**t... Minnesota I believe it was... that captured a picture of a herd of eight deer, three of which were albinos. A man who apparently had knowledge about the wildlife in that region concluded that between migration patterns, the area they inhabit, and that out of a population of 800,000 deer, only 20 were albinos, the "probability" of in any flock of eight deer in one area there being three albinos was numbered one in 87 billion, but it happened.

Probability is a tentative thing and without multiple repeated independant tests showing proper correlation (as any good statistician knows), should never be used in an argument, and certainly not to discard any scientific knowledge we currently have about chemistry and molecular biology. Especially not when that knowledge happens to tell us that in the over 400 million year window after the earth changed from being primarily volcanic to having an ocean and thick toxic atmosphere, a simple lightning strike in the right spot rich in materials needed to synthesize amino acids could have sparked life. 400 million years, atmosphere and sea rich in a multitude of elements, constant chaotic storms on the surface, such synthesis seems probable.

It is quite the freak occurance and improbable that our planet was in the right spot, with the right amount of materials to synthesize life, with the right lightning strike, the right environmental conditions. However, if it werent for freak planets like Earth, life would not exist (or have begun in the first place, if we were indeed seeded by aliens). Yes, any planet's probability of generating life might be ridiculously low (by cosmic standards) for all I care, but there are many many many more planets in the universe than anyone on Earth can fathom.



Legato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 822

01 Apr 2008, 3:47 pm

Forgive me for my mild outburst here, but I absolutely despise the idea of Intelligent Design in any form, be it aliens or God, whatever. It's a fun little idea to play around with, especially when the apparent "probability" seems quite daunting when talking about synthesis of life, but that is absolutely no reason for toss out the massive scientific advances we've had cracking this mystery.

Keep Intelligent Design out of science. Science's purpose is to figure out the natural forces and causes for the phenomena in our universe. Life had to start somewhere, and discovering how it could have happened naturally would be an amazing advancement in knowledge. Saying well I think aliens did it does nothing. The only thing left is God did it, but that's a feel-good copout to make religious people feel better about themselves and their philosophical choice. Neither have a place in science.

On the other had, Incompetant Design does seem promising. There is ample proof for Space Mushrooms and Time Ninjas :D:D:D:D:D:D



MR_BOGAN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 126
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,479
Location: The great trailer park in the sky!

01 Apr 2008, 4:14 pm

Legato wrote:
The universe was created in a battle between Space Mushrooms and Time Ninjas.

/discuss


Hey sorry to cross over threads. But I do believe in the theory of Space Mushrooms and Time Ninjas rather than god.

So does that mean I believe in Athesium, because to me the Space Mushroom is my creator



hyperbolic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,869

01 Apr 2008, 4:29 pm

Quote:
Incompetent design theorists have been carefully analyzing all of the features of creatures and recognize that so many of them suck that an evolutionary process isn't possible.


Whoever decides to call themselves an "incompetent design theorist" must have a thick skin. I'll give them credit for that.

I disagree that there is not some form of logic at work in evolutionary theory, however. Fuzzy logic is a kind of processing that checks random samples (which may come from a pool of predetermined data values) until a specific desired effect is achieved or expressed. DNA and gene expression is essentially like a computing mechanism when taken altogether. The DNA is the program and the traits expressed according to the genes are the output of that program. Random changes to the program can propagate throughout a species' DNA when it offers some advantage that is expressed as a trait. To me this propagation resembles fuzzy logic. The propagation takes time though, indeed, millions of years. A platypus may have a duckbill now, but if it makes it sufficiently problematic for the species to survive in its environment, it will disappear gradually. Otherwise, it may simply remain as an indicator of past needs.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

01 Apr 2008, 5:31 pm

Legato wrote:
Life had to start somewhere


Life didn't have to start anywhere. Also, your above misuse of statistics to disprove my example is not cogent.



BesideYouInTime
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 153

01 Apr 2008, 5:34 pm

[quote="iamnotaparakeet"][/quote]

"In physics and cosmology, the anthropic principle states that humans should take into account the constraints that human existence as observers imposes on the sort of universe that could be observed. In other words, the only universe we can see is one that supports life. If it were a different type of universe, we would not exist to see it."
-wikipedia



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

01 Apr 2008, 5:44 pm

BesideYouInTime wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:


"In physics and cosmology, the anthropic principle states that humans should take into account the constraints that human existence as observers imposes on the sort of universe that could be observed. In other words, the only universe we can see is one that supports life. If it were a different type of universe, we would not exist to see it."
-wikipedia


And that is supposed to prove what?



BesideYouInTime
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 153

01 Apr 2008, 6:06 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
And that is supposed to prove what?


That what you posted isn't a good argument for theistic abiogenesis. Unless I'm misinterpreting you.



Bluesummers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

01 Apr 2008, 6:12 pm

I don't know, you don't know, God doesn't know. No one knows. Deal with it, history shows it hasn't done anyone any good by making assumptions.


_________________
omgz I r banned.


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

01 Apr 2008, 7:38 pm

Bluesummers wrote:
I don't know, you don't know, God doesn't know. No one knows. Deal with it, history shows it hasn't done anyone any good by making assumptions.

I would say God probably knows. We humans can look at the world around us and try to come to the most logical conclusions possible given the evidence and our ability to interpret it.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Bluesummers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

01 Apr 2008, 7:41 pm

Orwell wrote:
Bluesummers wrote:
I don't know, you don't know, God doesn't know. No one knows. Deal with it, history shows it hasn't done anyone any good by making assumptions.

I would say God probably knows. We humans can look at the world around us and try to come to the most logical conclusions possible given the evidence and our ability to interpret it.
Except God is a creation of man. So blatantly obvious, given the glaring human flaws in a so called "omnipotent" being.


_________________
omgz I r banned.


Legato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 822

01 Apr 2008, 9:34 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Life didn't have to start anywhere.


While my finite human knowledge is just that, what alternative exists? As far as science and logical thought, not to mention the Law of Conservation of Energy, things do not just poof into existance. Unless you are somehow suggesting life does not exist, I don't see where you're going with this.

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Also, your above misuse of statistics to disprove my example is not cogent.


Erm I used statistics properly, though I did not cite my reference which I have lost in the flow of the internets, sadly -for which I do apologize.
You on the other hand simply conjured up or seized a number you found somewhere about a process we don't even fully understand, while migration patterns and population of albinos in Minnesotan deer is fully understood and actively measurable.

Just face the fact: the universe we know is an accidental by-product of the Great Battle between Space Mushrooms and Time Ninjas. :P