spudnik wrote:
Satanist are just confused Christians
That's one way to look at it. There are many paralells between the Satanist vs Christian debate, if you want to call it that, and disputes between Catholics and Protestants, or Orthodox and Coptics or what have you, in earlier centuries, when each side tended to accuse the other of Satanism. I was going to say that Satanists are not quite bright enough to have become actual atheists.
There's a lot of interesting art having to do with Satan. I can enjoy it without believing in Satan, just as I can enjoy Bach's church music without believing in that other one. Mikhail Vrubel, a prerevolutionary Russian painter, painted lots of pictures of the Devil, this is probably the most famous one:
And as many people have pointed out, by far the most interesting character in Milton's "Paradise Lost" is Satan, even though there's no reason I know of to doubt that Milton was anything less than a very sincere Christian. "Paradise Lost" is much more popular than the less-Satanic sequel "Paradise Regained," just as people have always shown much more interest in Dante's "Inferno" than in the subsequent two parts of his "Divine Comedy" having to do with Purgatory and Heaven. In short, fascination with concepts like Satan and Hell are nothing new. And the name "Lucifer" means "light-bringer," which is hard to think of as something entirely negative -- for me, at least. "Light-bringer" reminds me of Prometheus, the fire-bringer: someone who helped people and was unjustly condemned for it.
Perhaps Satanists are not so much confused Christians ans confused pagans. They tend to celebrate all the natural things, notably sexual desire, which Christianity has spent so much time and energy condemning. Jesus said "My kingdom is not of this world," while Satanists and pagans, as well as normal sensible people, tend to say Well hang on, let's not throw this world away so fast, there are some nice things in it.
Last edited by Bollinger on 24 Mar 2008, 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.