I suppose I opened this thread somewhat in the spirit of Ludwig Wittgenstein -- who may have been an Aspie btw. Wittgenstein was concerned with, among other things, the problems and misunderstandings which arise out of problems with language. So am I. I believe that words such as "can't," "must," "all," "none" and so forth, words which carry with them a indication of some absoluteness, are used much, much too frequently. This overuse reflects, imo, an insensitivity vis-a-vis the tremendous possibilities and the concommitant vast uncertainties of human existence. (And quite possible of other existences just as much or more so than our human experience.)
Wittgenstein's insistence that no translation of any of his works should be published without the original text on the pages facing the translation is one indication of his concern over misunderstandings of all sorts arising from misinterpretations of language. I don't know for certain whether or not he was an Asperger, but I certainly share his concern.
To return to the title of the thread, before it can start to make any sense, a very specific definition of factories, and of philosophy, is essential.
Orwell points out that philosophy fared very badly under Soviet rule. Even if if we accept for the sake of argument that Orwell's statement is true, it does not refute the statement in the thread title, because a factory which produces low-quality products, or even one which doesn't produce anything because its lines keep breaking down, or because the workers are always on strike, or because no-one can figure out how to run the machines which assemble things on the line or what have you, can still be a factory. Maybe a very bad factory, but a factory nonetheless.
I would have been more inclined to agree with Orwell if he had said that the Soviet Union was a problem-plagued philosophy factory which turned out a lot of inferior product.
_________________
"Dada ist die Sonne, Dada ist das Ei. Dada ist die Polizei der Polizei." Richard Huelsenbeck