Quote:
i'd say latin is more useful.
Well. one thing about Latin is that it gives you a head start in understanding most other European languages - especially French, Italian and, indeed, Spanish - as well as a lot of things about the underlying structure and meaning of English.
I'm all for as many people learning as many different languages as they can handle. I can see why Spanish would be practical in the US, but then you are a melting-pot nation, and some areas are undoubtedly more Spanish-influenced than others, so there might be areas in which other languages would be as, or more, appropriate. (In quite a few places, that
would be Mandarin Chinese.)
It's not for me as a British person to say whether English-speaking American kids should learn Spanish, but I will point out some of the inaccuracies and wrong assumptions in this screed, because I've encountered things like this before and they annoy me.
One, Spanish has been in the Americas, and in the USA, more or less from the very beginning, so it's not a 'new' foreign language. By a series of historical accidents, it probably very nearly missed actually being the main language (along with Dutch, Portuguese and a few other contenders).
Two, I doubt if most Hispanics would want Spanish replacing English in the workplace when they don't even all speak it! One survey found that 95% of the children of Mexican immigrants speak English, and over half of
their kids speak
only English. (1985 study by Rand, cited in
Mother Tongue by Bill Bryson - an excellent book with a large section about exactly this kind of prejudice.) Simple logic - if you're an immigrant, not learning the local language puts you at an immediate, huge disadvantage, so it's in your interests to do so.
Three, this person, whoever actually came up with this, doesn't sound like they'd take kindly to them, or their child, having to learn
any foreign language. In my experience it's generally this way round: I know of English speaking British people who, quite seriously, think that if they want to move to Tuscany or the South of France, the locals 'should' speak English to them rather than them having to learn French or Italian. In contrast, they're always quite voluble that 'foreigners' over here should be forced to learn English. (Although in our experience of local migrant workers, most of them are happy to make the effort.)
I'm a bad person to ask about this, because I'm all for anyone learning languages, period - the earlier the better, because that's when we're primed to do it. (I'm also a terminal optimist. This is why I'm a 39-year-old white, British person attempting to learn Coast Salish.

)
Incidentally, to count as a dead language, a language has to have no native speakers. Spanish has
300-400 million native speakers, globally second only to Mandarin. Whoever wrote this knows nothing about linguistics.
_________________
"Grunge? Isn't that some gross shade of greenish orange?"
Last edited by ThatRedHairedGrrl on 22 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.