Psimulus wrote:
Their is nothing more than the Universe. The Universe consists of all that is.
I beg your pardon but there is
NO way that such a thing can be known right now! Dont forget that absence of
evidence is NOT evidence of absence! The fact remains that *We* DONT KNOW what's beyond the Unverse and if the Universe is all their is. However, the article spoke of the
Observable Universe and that there is evidence that much of the Universe is not observable by means of EMR. I suspect that our Universe has higher dimension to it which would explain why much of it is not evident to us.
Psimulus wrote:
Its a matter of language, physics, and simple logic. The Universe consists of verses. A verse can be considered to be a "parallel" to other verses.The set as a whole is the Universe. I was once disillusioned in how I defined or distinguished what these terms represent as well. If an interaction is occuring then It seems that this other component has physical attributes and as such is connected. If it were not connected then we would be unaware of its presence. Their is nothing "outside" our Universe. There is no outside in the sense that you are considering. We inhabit a verse which is contained within the body of the Universe. Other verses are also resident. Also, I do not find any solace in being disagreeable. I find it difficult to permit the media to continuate the myth of more than one Universe when if one just reflects on the data available it is very simple for almost anyone to deduce that what I am attempting to relay is absolutely correct.
You are confusing philosophy with physics my friend!