ToadOfSteel wrote:
While I agree with Holocaust denial being hate-speech, it should still be protected.
how is it hate speech?
it's like challenging the validity of the gulf of tonkin incident. it doesn't necessarily have to be that the person hates the jews. i've seen arguments before where idiots can't do their math right and say that it would be impossible to incinerate so many jews in such a short period of time.
now here's a little intellectual exercise for you....what if empirical evidence were presented that proved that the holocaust didn't have nearly the scope as claimed? would you even start to be willing to change what you know as reality...or would you simply bark such evidence down as hate speech and ignore it?
gulf of tonkin is proof that just because events are claimed doesn't mean they actually happen or at least not necessarily as reported and initially recorded in history books. i'd actually dare to say that such deniers just provide an excellent way to reaffirm history by going through the numbers, going through the records and proving it again and again.
I think I see your point but your post here is really inflammatory. And your use of the word "fa***t?" Who do you think you are?