If Thomas Jefferson could have seen this, he would have laughed. I don't know what they tell you guys about the American Revolution, aka the English Civil War, but even in 1770 England showed that it really didn't give a sh*t about the rights of its people. They made a series of boneheaded moves that basically pushed America into full rebellion, made the situation much worse, then they ran the war on the cheap with generals who really didn't want to be fighting in the colonies and thus didn't care, therefore it didn't matter that the English had the world's best army since they only fought a half-assed war.
What happened was that the colonies cost money, yet weren't producing anything. (The farmland that was under cultivation had previously been forest and thus yield was low, and no gold had been found, much to everyone's disappointment.) Therefore, Parliament enacted taxes. Previously, the colonies had been untaxed. They kept piling on the taxes until they nearly had a rebellion in Boston in 1770 (Boston Massacre), then repealed most of it.
But a revolutionary foothold was established, and they weren't willing to give up easily, in many ways they were the spiritual ancestors of the American militia movement. So the revolutionaries hatched a plan to throw a legit shipment of tea into Boston Harbor, tea that was competing with smuggled tea from the likes of John Hancock and other signers of the Declaration of Independence. This took place in 1773, the "Boston Tea Party".
From there the king placed America under military rule, and in one of the most stupid decisions ever made by any empire in human history, they forced American families to feed and house detachments of British soldiers in the families' own homes and at their own expense. It was a way to save money, but it infuriated the colonists, as did those soldiers competing for work alongside Americans, and employers forced to hire soldiers over civilians, another dumb move. After that, the colonists broke down the Patriot door, they couldn't sign them up fast enough.
Once England found itself in a real war, they treated the war as an inconvenience, since America wasn't very rich in resources from their perspective. The generals were third rate, they used cheap German mercenaries (Hessians) to do much of the fighting and obligatory terrorizing of the populace, they tried to recruit slaves which further angered rich plantation owners, after every victory or partial victory for the colonists mass numbers of brass would get sacked so the people running it had zero clue. England badly underestimated what Americans would tolerate, likely because English subjects tolerated worse. And they ran it all on the cheap, and tried to shove as many costs for the war onto impoverished colonists as possible.
After that, they sort of learned their lesson, because they learned not to wage war against Englishmen wanting independence. (Brown people like East Indians were another matter entirely, and the crown fought ferociously against Gandhi.) But England still tends to view controlling a deteriorating situation as a matter of force, and in the end they'll either have a revolution with the royals hanged from streetlights or everybody who can leave will and the brain drain will basically end England's viability as an independent, First World country. England will look much like the Middle East, with the estates of the few remaining nobles situated behind thick blast walls and the rest of the country handed over to marauding youth gangs and various jihadist lunatics. Failed state, anyone?