Some [one] on another forum I post on has made, what can only be the most stupid, and insensitive, arguments ever. Either way, it was a debate on whether or not the God of Christianity was the moral law giver yet the guy arguing against Christianity (Hooks) came up with these "insights".
Hooks wrote:
Evangelicals who successfully incorporate Paul’s claims and doctrines into their set of beliefs have essentially learned to interact with nonbelievers as if they were autistic. This is a strong claim, so please allow me to explain.
Children who are born with autism seem to lack the capacity to understand that others do not see what they see, hear what they hear, and know what they know. Essentially, they lack the ability to empathize without knowing they lack this ability. How do people who were not afflicted with autism at birth begin to think as if they have autism? I would contend this happens when Evangelicals accept as unassailable truths many plainly false claims of the Apostle Paul.
The only way for something immutable and unchanging to empathize is for that thing to be able to read minds, and you cannot do that, so the contention stands. A robot remain unyielding and unaffected by people, and is unempathetic. Regardless, you have no reply to my contention (supported by research) that certainty is not more than an emotion, and remarkably has little, if any, correlation with reality. In a sense then, it is like being drunk. Do you endorse drunkenness? If not, why do you endorse certainty? As you imply later, why should you enter a debate you are not prepared for? Did you read up on all the pathophysiology of certainty. Even more so, what about the pathophysiology of autism. Are you aware, for example, that some have tried (with some measure of success) to treat autism with Narcan, a drug used to treat Alcohol and Narcotic addiction as well? If certainty and autism are in any way related, why would you be so interested in retaining it?
What was funny is that the Christian guy he was debating had Autism. What was even funnier was that even when everybody in the commentary thread said he lost, the guy insisted he was right and that if we went to another forum, everbody would agree. I decided to take him up on his offer and his post his ridiculous sentiments about Autism here.
The commentary thread is
here.
I would link to where the debate took place but that specific part of the forum said posts were made is invisible to non-members.
_________________
"The capacity to hate is a frightening reality. We are always ready to blame another of the circumstances can free us from our own self guilt"