New NYC “Karen” incident

Post Reply New Topic

Puerto Ricans and Cubans are culturally prone think of themselves as white even when they are part black
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10 ... 0707200604

The moment they step ashore in the US they want to assimilate into the white American community and pass.

I don't have a problem with their choices (it's a free world) but the woman in this story is unambiguously white so I doubt she ever been mistaken for as a POC

She asked all the pepple in hotel lobby to empty their pockets before settling on the only black person in the hotel which suggests she has a "Becky" Brain. The dumb racist biatch didn't realise he's the son of a grammy award winning musician who'se father is a millionaire and can afford something like a mobile phone.

She ran away to avoid police and then contacted the media claiming she was attacked. However video footage clearly shows the madwoman attacking the 14 year old boy. When confronted about the video she has gone back into hiding.

Hopefully the police flush out this rat.

I’ve known Puerto Ricans and Cubans—both light and dark-skinned—who are proud of their Hispanic heritage, and who don’t aspire to be “white” or “Anglo.”

This appears to be an interesting case...Based on what I have seen of the footage, it appears fairly likely that she assaulted the youth, and will possibly be charged for this (also, potentially "unlawful arrest\imprisonment" related to the "he's not leaving. show me the proof" remark she made and attempts to stop him leaving).

With that said, there didn't appear to be anything in the footage (either from the father, or the building's security footage) indicating race was the reason behind her actions...She appears to have had previous issues where police action was required (both alcohol related), so it would be interesting to know whether this was also a contributing factor in her actions with regards to this event.

From what I have seen, it's likely she just saw someone slipping a phone that looked like hers into their pocket, realised she didn't have hers and made the leap to assuming that it was her phone that the person had placed in their pocket, then reacted as shown in the footage.

Nate Broady has an informative\educational overview of the events (the possibility of "robbery"\"attempted robbery" regarding this interaction was one I hadn't considered until I watched his video regarding this).


Similarly, VivaFrei has a a different observation regarding the interactions as well.

(also viewable at https://rumble.com/vcfrun-what-we-can-learn-from-soho-karen-viva-frei-vlawg.html)

This lady has a real problem....

I hope the prosecutors take her past misdeeds into account. She needs a jail cell. She’s a potential menace wherever she goes.

She surely needs alcohol treatment. I wonder if she regrets her actions when she is sober.

Yep. The types who say “who is your supervisor? Let me talk to (her/him)—over something extremely petty.

Y'know, since names tend to be either male or female as a convention, though unisex names exist, any meme or social reference is likely based on a male or female name. Does that mean calling someone a Benedict Arnold is a sexist term, since it's a MAN'S name? Or how about saying someone got Borked, is that sexist since it's named after a fella named Bork? Arnold and Bork were both white, so does that make them racist terms, too? What about the term "ugly betty"? Or "Negative Nancy"? Or all the other memes about Good Guy Gus, or Bad Luck Brett or w/e names they were given? "Bye Felicia".

Seems like people tend to pick and choose what to be offended at. I know people actually named karen that aren't offended by the karen meme.

So what if everyone overreacts at minor things at some point? Even *if* true, that doesn't make it acceptable. Guess that means everyone is a karen at some point in their life. Oh well.

Just cos "some people" might subvert a term to their ends doesn't mean one has to help perpetuate it, rather than simply know and understand and accept it's original meaning as intended. Just cos the flag moves doesn't mean one has to move with it. "Karen" means overreacting person. Any gender, any race, any age, any class, can be one.

Anyone can act entitled - but some people have raised it to an art form. Don't wanna be made famous for acting a fool? Don't act a fool. Don't want people to think you're the type of lunatic that would attack a kid? Don't attack a kid. But - in soho karen's case - you don't get to claim you're not the type to do a thing that we literally watched a video of you actually doing. "That's not who I am!" But you did it, so... You don't get to claim "I wasn't me!" any time you do something nasty, in order to get a mulligan on the consequences.

The Karens who demand to see the manager over something petty are women (mostly; there are men who do it, too) who have found that they get their way by doing this.
Wasting the staff and supervision ‘s time, usually during busy hours, delaying and annoying other customers, causing a commotion, all gets them an emotional reward.
They got their way.
They were right.
They were the center of attention.
They were important.
This time, one of them hurt someone.
If something serious does not happen; jail time, forced alcohol/drug rehab, she will continue, will escalate, and someone else will get hurt. Worse.

Police stopped her yesterday over a seperate incident. Judging from her appearance she's a wealthy spoilt brat who looks like and acts like a "becky"





Her refusal to address injuring the boy and the father smacks of white privilege.