Lecturer At Yale Event Fantasizes About Murdering Whites

Post Reply New Topic

https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/the-psychopathic-problem-of-the-white?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyMTYxNjg0LCJwb3N0X2lkIjozNzE4Mzc5OSwiXyI6InQzTmQ4IiwiaWF0IjoxNjIyODM5MjM4LCJleHAiOjE2MjI4NDI4MzgsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yNjAzNDciLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.C7U5LkIi_JpRX361EdEbihPuIQAs9-f_FyBiEZnXsC8&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#play

Speaker as did an interview here that presents ideas as complete thoughts. I may have input later.

Trump's speech Jan 6 was taken Wayyy out of context. But that never seemed to matter.
I don't know what context in which fantasizing about killing persons of another race would be OK.

“I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the heads of any ________ person that got in my way, burying their body, and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a f*****g favor.”

Put any race in the blank and you would be banned from everywhere on the internet. Why is it considered acceptable to put "white" in the blank?

Except that psychopaths are unemotional. Because they project all their violence outside of themselves and never process their own emotions about violence. They are cold and calculating because they never own their own s**t. And they seriously have no negative emotions. Which is why all white people are chillingly objective.

...

And yet, every white person also truly believes that they are the unique and special exception to privilege and get [break] So much so, that they each individually believe they are the true liberators of the third world, it is their calling. The Chosen One.

...

The unbridled expression of tears, raw indignation and outrage over all the world's atrocities are part of a careful cultivation of how white people need to be seen. It's the stuff of legends. You know when it's happening because you just kinda sit back, get some popcorn and watch the show of emotion.

...

White outrage is a moral badge of honour. For how much moral concern they have for what is really going on. How much better they are than us.

...

White people show off and display coloured kids that they, quote, helped. Selfie. #TremendousCapacityToCare... filmmakers can, quote, give voice to other communities. International adoption. Click click. Always look to see who's in the centre of the shot, has the mic, or who the story in the press is really about. Poof. White magic. This is why all white people love injustices, it's their chance to shine and take centre stage. And the little voice inside of you knows that it would be damn near impolite to gently question, "why the f**k are you so outraged?".

I'm beginning to like this woman. Got to admit she has really dunked on the fashionable left, which is all white people as far as she is concerned.

Finished it now anyway. Others may enjoy it.

Virtual-signalling gone hyper-feral, muchly?
How embarrassing.

Then you've never had to argue with someone who attempts to dismiss your basic humanity and then goes on to insist that being frustrated by their behaviour is unreasonable.

I don't agree that it's fair to stereotype all white people as engaging in that behaviour, but I've met enough who do it to believe that for some people that stereotype may form based on experience. I don't really care if people have violence fantasies so long as they're intended to remain only as fantasy. How dare someone get angry by constant antagonism just because some of the people like those who do it don't get what it's like.

This person is stereotyping white people like white people stereotype black people.

I'm always willing to acknowledge that there is racism in our society....I'm always willing to discuss it. I'm not an ostrich burying my head in the sand. I live in New York City. I grew up in a segregated neighborhood.

But I am not for anybody justifying violence against a person by virtue of the person's race, and nothing else. Of whatever race or ethnic group. This person goes beyond the pale.

But there is a racist mindset against whites, apparently.

Discussing a fantasy isn't the same as justifying violence though and you do occasionally bury your head in the sand even if you certainly make an effort overall.

Because the bulk of the media has a left-wing bias.
Simples.

God/Satan, I hate big business and their hypocrisy.

You mean the same media that's consistently adversarial to social democrats and anything to the left of centrist liberals?

There is such thing as racism against whites.....just like there's such thing as racism against non-whites.

I'm not going to sympathize with someone attacking me with a knife......because they were the victim of systemic racism, and because I am white. That's just garbage. The person attacking me with a knife is a criminal.

"A Raisin in the Sun" is an example of a movie which depicted "black rage." And it was a great movie. William Faulkner did an excellent job in his novels of depicting the pathological racism of some Southern people pre-Civil Rights Era.

But a serious academic conference lending credence to the advocacy of violence against a person of a certain race......that's way beyond the pale.

As far as I'm concerned, "critical race theory" will perpetuate racism. We have to acknowledge the history, and the present actuality.....but I'll be damned if I'm going to be placed in a group which inevitably is irredeemably racist.

This is rather like Calvinism. You are consigned to your fate in Calvinism at birth. There's no way you could be blessed through your earthly good deeds if you are not "blessed" at birth, according to this theology.

Interesting segment here, she does actually distinguish between liberals and "all white people" in the interview:

Is what you're writing going to be from a conservative perspective?

Well, I’m not conservative so, no.

I ask because I actually think that conservatives are psychologically healthier.

Interesting.

They are more in touch with their anger and negative feelings. They can articulate it. They can say it, they’re not covering it up or like “Oh my god, I’m amazing, I love all people.” There's not all this liberal fluff of goodness. Conservatives can go there. They can say things that are uncomfortable that I think liberals would shirk at or move away from or deny.

I would feel more comfortable hanging out with Ann Coulter than a lot of liberals because she’s unlikely to do anything. She’s in contact with her anger and her hatred, and I think that needs to be worked through, don't get me wrong, for the country to heal, but she's actually in contact with those feelings that a lot of people can't say out loud and that's a safer space. Now do I agree with her? No. But liberals have no access to that at all. The thought is forbidden.

Where did she actually advocate for violence?

Lending credence to the fantasy lends credence to violence.