Mysterious jump in excess mortality among younger cohorts
Isn't this just like ice cream causing more shark attacks?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7592579.stm
The sharks lend money to the ice cream salesmen so they can attract more food (As in people) to the beaches. This is why they are called loan sharks, because they have good profits from their initial investment.
I worked on the railways when the smoking ban in Wales came in on the stations. It was only the stations owned by the railway themselves that took part in the ban as oter stations not owned by the railway such as Fishguard did not have the ban on their platform.
There was a significent noticable drop in the commuters that were travelling from West Wales into Swansea during that time as many regulars who smoked took to their cars to drive into places like Swansea. I used to recieve a ticket bonus, and this dropped during that time. I would say the sales of tickets on those commuter trains that I personally sold dropped by around 15 to 20% after the ban because it was over an hours travel for many commuters and people who smoke were not allowed to smoke on the trains anyway, so they just gave up using the trains and went by car. They had turned to use the trains for two reasons. One was to avoid hitting the traffic queues on the way into the towns and cities, and the second was to destress. The ticket prices were fairly similar to the prices that they paid to put fuel in their cars to commute. We lost a fair amount of regulars when the ban came in.
_________________
.
Another correlation between excess death and vaccination status:
https://www.unz.com/proberts/german-sta ... accinated/
German Statisticians Find the Same Result in Germany as the UK Health Security Agency Reports: It Is a Pandemic of the Vaccinated.
In Germany the states with the highest vaccination rate have the most excess deaths.
Dr. Ute Bergner, a physicist who is a member of the Thuringian state parliament in Germany, commissioned statisticians to investigate the relationship between vaccination and excess mortality in the 16 German federal states.
The statisticians found that the states with the lowest percentage of the population vaccinated had the lowest excess mortality. In contrast the state with the highest vaccination rate (66%) had the highest rate of excess deaths.
“The correlation coefficient is +0.31. In the eyes of the two data scientists this is ‘astonishingly high.’ Especially since the believers in the vaccine are claiming the opposite but provide no proof for their notion of ‘protection’. One should at the least expect a different relationship: the more vaccinations, the lower the mortality. After all, the intention was to protect people.”
“The excess mortality increases with the increase in the vaccination rate. This requires urgent clarification,” demanded the two statisticians. Furthermore, in view of “the pending political measures aimed at containing the virus this figure is worrying and requires explanation if further political measures are to be taken with the aim of increasing the vaccination rate.”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/german-st ... ty/5762622
UK figures from the last week:
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
Children don't die often, so this isn't actually a huge increase in absolute numbers, but it is another interesting signal nonetheless, one much more closely matched with the vaccine rollout.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-se ... ata-shows/
UK sees 44% increase in child deaths after jab rollout for young teens, data shows
LONDON (LifeSiteNews) – U.K. reports on child deaths from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that, in the weeks since the COVID shot has been administered to children between ages 12 and 15, recorded deaths have risen by 44 percent above the 2015-2019 average for the same time period.
According to the ONS’ “five-year average weekly deaths by sex and age group” figures between 2015 and 2019 among children ages 10-14, there were 41 deaths recorded from week 38 (late September) to week 45 (early November). Within the same time period, the weekly figures recorded for the year 2021 show that 59 children died, representing a 43.9 percent rise in deaths over the five-year average.
A report from The Exposé notes that deaths among 10-14-year-olds have been consistently above that of the national five-year average since the shots started being administered to children, save for one week, week 42. Week 38 saw more than double the deaths among the young age group, going from a five-year average of three deaths to eight deaths in 2021.
The single largest weekly death count was observed in week 40, about two weeks after the jab had been rolled out, at which point 11 children died in 2021 compared with the five-year average of four, representing a 175 percent rise in deaths.
Breaking down the data into male and female categories, The Exposé showed that although more boys’ deaths were recorded, 2021 has marked a greater percentage of increase in deaths for girls.
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
A short (3:55) video for those who don't like reading. Also contains a nice example of modern medicine/science failing in its duty - according to this cardiologist a medical institution refused to publish research that linked mRNA shots to cardiovascular problems for fear of losing funding from the pharmaceutical giants.
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
Edit: forum didn't like that link with those brackets.
archive link: https://archive.md/DZg01
High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [[1]]. In Germany, the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated (“breakthrough infections”) is reported weekly since 21. July 2021 and was 16.9% at that time among patients of 60 years and older [[2]]. This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission. A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%) [[3]]. One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100.000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more. In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]]. The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (99.9–84.3%) as “high” transmission counties [[5]]. Many decisionmakers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.
In a sane world they'd have stopped the vaccination campaign months ago. I can only assume the mandate madness is about covering up the potentially epic magnitude of this screw-up.
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/if- ... lems-youll
Alex Berenson summarising the study referenced above:
A new study of 566 patients who received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines shows that signs of cardiovascular damage soared following the shots. The risk of heart attacks or other severe coronary problems more than doubled months after the vaccines were administered, based on changes in markers of inflammation and other cell damage.
Patients had a 1 in 4 risk for severe problems after the vaccines, compared to 1 in 9 before.
Dr. Steven Gundry [EDIT, see note at bottom], a Nebraska physician and retired cardiac surgeon, presented the findings at the Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association’s annual conference in Boston last week. An abstract is available in Circulation, the AHA’s scientific journal.
...
Dr. Gundry regularly tests patients for early signs of heart problems, such as inflammation and cellular death. The patients are then given a score designed to predict their risk of developing an acute coronary syndrome in the next five years.
What’s an acute coronary syndrome? Glad you asked. Per the Mayo Clinic:
Acute coronary syndrome is a term used to describe a range of conditions associated with sudden, reduced blood flow to the heart. One such condition is a heart attack (myocardial infarction) — when cell death results in damaged or destroyed heart tissue.
Gundry found that his patients saw an increase in risk from 11 percent to 25 percent, and the risks persisted for at least 2.5 months after the second dose. His takeaway:
“We conclude that the mRNA [vaccines] dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
Which might explain why cardiologists around the world are seeing cases like this:
Just another post-vaccine case of myocarditis, this one requiring a 38-year-old woman to be put on a heart-lung bypass machine to save her her life.
Mild n’ rare, amirite, Dr. Walensky?
So we have so far a strong correlation between the vaccine and the appearance of blood factors that suggest cardiovascular damage and heart attack risk. We have considerable excess deaths compared to the 5 year average, and compared to covid year 0 (2020) and these excess deaths are often related to cardiovascular problems. We have a reasonable model for how this is occurring (spike protein manufacture provoking an immune response that targets the body's own cardiovascular system). It's not quite proved yet, but it is not looking good.
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/stat ... 5447897089
Note to people who are bad at critical thinking: If we someday learn that getting the vax was a huge mistake, please don’t tell me you knew all along. You are guessing just like the rest of us. Someone will guess right.
Scott "The Great Predictor" Adams is in CYA mode as it looks like his previous pro-vaccine beliefs might have been the wrong choice. He is getting a lot of flak for stating that the anti-vaxxers were "guessing" like he was "guessing" the vaccine was safe.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244422
Here he is rightly torn a new one.
If we someday learn..... "you were guessing"?
Oh really?
Well let's talk facts eh? None of these are in dispute, by the way.
So no, it is not guessing to take all of these facts, none of which are in dispute, and conclude that:
So no, if this turns out to be an utterly insane and disastrous choice to so-state doing this was stupid in advance, as I and some others have done, was not a "wild guess."
...
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
https://goodsciencing.com/covid/71-athl ... ovid-shot/
^ This page is tracking athlete "health incidents" with a potential connection to vaccination in 2021 including:
Heart Attack or Cardiac Arrest
Blood Clots or Thrombosis
Stroke
Irregular Heartbeat
Arrythmia
Neuropathy
Death
So far: 291 incidents, 167 dead (compared to the usual 0-4 a year)
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
For those who can read a great deal check out:
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... accination
Here's a less heavy twitter synopsis by one of the authors:
https://mobile.twitter.com/MartinNeil9/ ... 7762671628
1.Our research team have now analysed the ONS England November mortality data. We conclude that despite seeming evidence to support vaccine effectiveness this conclusion is doubtful because of a range of serious inconsistencies and anomalies.
2.The data appear to show lower non-Covid mortality for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Odd. Also unvaccinated mortality rates peak at the same time as the vaccine rollout peaks for the age group, then falls and closes in on the vaccinated. This is not natural
3. Consider what we are witnessing here. We have a vaccine whose recipients are suffering fewer non-covid deaths and hence are benefitting from improved mortality. And the mortality rates look to differ significantly from historical norms, as evidenced in mortality lifetables.
4.Correlating unvaccinated mortality with vaccine roll out we see curious patterns (dotted line the proportion of people getting first and second doses). Why are the unvaccinated dying after NOT getting the 1st dose? Why are the single dosed dying after NOT getting the 2nd dose?
5.Plenty of evidence that the vaccinated who die within 14 days of vaccination may be categorized as unvaccinated. Then someone who dies within 14 days of first dose is miscategorised as unvaccinated and a similar thing could occur post second dose.
6. Miscategorization might explain odd phenomena in ONS mortality. To correct the error we can take the difference between the expected mortality for the unvaccinated and the data, and re-allocate this unexpected excess mortality to the vaccinated to get new ADJUSTED estimates.
7. The early spikes in mortality that appear to occur soon after vaccination may be caused by the infirm, moribund, and severely ill receiving vaccination in priority order and thus simply appearing to hasten deaths that might otherwise have occurred later in the year.
8.Turning to Covid mortality, at face value, there appears to be clear evidence of vaccine effectiveness. But……..
9.After vaccination people endure weakened immune response for a period of up to 28 days and may be in danger of infection from Covid or other infectious agent at any time in that period. It therefore makes sense to examine infection date rather than date of death registration.
10.We adjust for this using a temporal offset and see a large spike in mortality for all age groups during the early weeks, when covid prevalence was high, and when the first dose vaccination rollout peaked.
11.After our offset adjustment we observe no significant benefit of the vaccines in the short term. They appear to expose people to an increased mortality, in line with what we know about immune exposure or pre-infection risks,
12.Whatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that the ONS data is both unreliable and misleading.
Absent any better explanation Occam’s razor would support our conclusions. The ONS data provide no reliable evidence that the vaccines reduce all-cause mortality.
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/06/pfize ... nd-deaths/
A federal judge ordered that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOAI) request that was filed by a government accountability group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.
The group which has more than 30 esteemed members, including professors and scientists, asked the federal government to share any and all data that factored into the agency’s hasty decision to grant Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine an emergency use authorization (EUA).
The data amounts to over a massive 329,000 documents, and in what appears an attempt to bury the information, the FDA had previously challenged the FOIA Request in court. Nevertheless, the agency was ordered to release the documents
...
Now that the courts have ordered the compliance with the FOIA stating that The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must turn over the documents, the FDA has released the first batch related to Pfizer’s vaccine that they granted Emergency Use Authorisation
The First Batch of Documents Shows Over 1,200 Vaccine Deaths WITHIN FIRST 90 DAYS
...
A Total of 42,086 Case Reports Including 1223 Fatal Reactions
As the report only included adverse events to the vaccine that researchers considered “serious cases,” there were thousands more submissions that were left out of this data.
The report states that in all there were a total of 42,086 case reports of individuals who had an adverse reaction to Pfizer’s vaccine worldwide, with the largest number (13,739) coming from the United States and from the UK (13,404).
According to the document’s women (29,914) were over 3x more likely to experience a reaction than men (9182). A total of 1223 individuals had a fatal reaction to the experimental Pfizer vaccine.
Also hilariously:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-says- ... 45410.html
FDA Says It Now Needs 75 Years to Fully Release Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Data
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!