I think Dear Leader may be a bit confused (or just plain ignorant), as there is no "Noble" Prize for Journalism.
There isn't even any such thing as a "Noble" prize -- it's actually "Nobel"
When Alfred Nobel signed his will in 1895, he specified that the bulk of his estate be spent on awarding prizes for those who made significant contributions in one of five fields. These fields are chemistry, physics, medicine, literature and peace.
A sixth Nobel Prize was created in 1969 in the field of economics. This award is not technically a Nobel Prize because the Bank of Sweden finances funds for the award. However, some of the committee nominating and selecting a winner in mathematics have ties to other committees that grant the Prize to those in other science branches.
Maybe Dear Leader was thinking (and I use the term loosely) of the Pulitzer prize ... ?
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.