The system will fall
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
But yeah I really don't have the time to go list a bunch of examples of this at the moment cause I have to head to class.......but when I come back maybe I will.
None of this is capitalism. Capitalism requires a complete separation of state and economy. That means that corporations have zero political influence and gov'ts have zero economic influence.
The situations explained within Economic Hitman do not take place within the framework of a capitalist economy; therefore are not relevant to any criticism of capitalism.
Well it seems the current form of capitalism requires corporations to be in charge of what the government does.....unfortunatly the corporations have far too much influence on politics. I would be open to the argument that what we have is not true capitalism.......But last I checked its not considered a socialist/communist system so that kinda leaves capitalism....the situations within Economic hit man have everything to do with a lot of what is wrong with the capitalist system we have in the U.S and how it negitvely effects the world.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I'm still mostly with Sweetleaf. Just because Capitalism is the only game in town doesn't make it the only game available. Come on people, we are the creative ones. If we don't like it, let's work out something that will work for everyone.
It took me under a minute, by the way, to find out the wealth disparity in the United States (not my country, and this is a global problem, not just an American one, regardless of what some Americans think).
According to the Institute for Policy Studies, the most wealthy 1% of Americans own 33.8% of the wealth. The 90th to the 99th percentle combined own another 37.7% of it. The bottom 50% own 2.5% (the decimal point is in the correct place) of the wealth. http://www.businessinsider.com/15-chart ... 010-4?op=1 That comes from the Institute for Policy Studies, via Business Insider: hardly the most liberal (I know this is a bad word in much of the US) of publications.
The trouble is, capitalism is based on a series of false assumptions. Actually, they're so obviously false assumptions one might go as far as to call them lies. Those lies are designed to work in the best interests of a few people with money to begin with, and not in the best interests of the less well off or the global commons (the environment and natural resources). That system is now falling apart under the weight of its own contradictions, taking the rest of us with it.
I see one solution to this - work out something better, based on evidence, not lies.
Anyway, I'm off back to trying to work out how a postcapitalist society might function, based on evidence.
Makes sense.
Niall
Velociraptor
Joined: 12 Feb 2011
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 478
Location: Forth Estuary Area, Western Palearctic Archipelago, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way
Some interesting figures for you here, Sweetleaf:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internatio ... stribution
In particular, that "A study by the World Institute for Development Economics Research at United Nations University reports that the richest 1% of adults alone owned 40% of global assets in the year 2000, and that the richest 10% of adults accounted for 85% of the world total. The bottom half of the world adult population owned barely 1% of global wealth."
My view is that reforming the system that is this broken is not any sort of solution. Even if you're wrong, and the system is not of the verge of imminent collapse (I wouldn't make any bets either way, but I'm pretty sure t won't continue in its current form in my natural lifetime) we need to work out an alternative.
Actually, a lot of the work has been done. There is good work on sustainability coming out of the Worldwatch Institute. People are experimenting with Transition societies. You have Schumacher's work, and so on. I suspect it may be about working out a synthesis, and then sussing out how to get from here to there, possibly in the midst of worsening climate change, without too much environmental damage and too many people getting hurt.
The aspie in me, who loves these complex systems, actually relishes this kind of challenge.
But yeah I really don't have the time to go list a bunch of examples of this at the moment cause I have to head to class.......but when I come back maybe I will.
None of this is capitalism. Capitalism requires a complete separation of state and economy. That means that corporations have zero political influence and gov'ts have zero economic influence.
The situations explained within Economic Hitman do not take place within the framework of a capitalist economy; therefore are not relevant to any criticism of capitalism.
Well it seems the current form of capitalism requires corporations to be in charge of what the government does.....unfortunatly the corporations have far too much influence on politics. I would be open to the argument that what we have is not true capitalism.......But last I checked its not considered a socialist/communist system so that kinda leaves capitalism....the situations within Economic hit man have everything to do with a lot of what is wrong with the capitalist system we have in the U.S and how it negitvely effects the world.
We have a mixed economy; heavily based on capitalism but combined with elements of socialism, communism and fascism.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
But yeah I really don't have the time to go list a bunch of examples of this at the moment cause I have to head to class.......but when I come back maybe I will.
None of this is capitalism. Capitalism requires a complete separation of state and economy. That means that corporations have zero political influence and gov'ts have zero economic influence.
The situations explained within Economic Hitman do not take place within the framework of a capitalist economy; therefore are not relevant to any criticism of capitalism.
Well it seems the current form of capitalism requires corporations to be in charge of what the government does.....unfortunatly the corporations have far too much influence on politics. I would be open to the argument that what we have is not true capitalism.......But last I checked its not considered a socialist/communist system so that kinda leaves capitalism....the situations within Economic hit man have everything to do with a lot of what is wrong with the capitalist system we have in the U.S and how it negitvely effects the world.
We have a mixed economy; heavily based on capitalism but combined with elements of socialism, communism and fascism.
I am aware, but it is usually referred to as capitialsim not capitalism with elements of socialism communism and facism though I am not seeing the elements of communism so much. So yeah when I talk about captitalism in this thread that would be referring to the system most people call capitalism.......but I personally certainly recognize that there are elements of other things in our system.
JWC: "pure capitalism" is as much a joke as "pure socialism" (i.e. utopian communism).
We were closest to "pure capitalism" in the 19th century, yet people these days have such a short memory. The vast majority of people weren't too happy with that system. Conditions were so bad that labor conflicts frequently lead to disruptive strikes and violence, even to the point of threatening stability. The fact that organized labor persuaded government to regulate labor relations saved the system from becoming the complete dystopia that Marx predicted and ultimately saved capitalism in the 20th century.
jojobean
Veteran
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk
I am sick to the kind teeth of people like you comparing me to a leech because nobody will give me a job and don't have the head for business.
This conversation is over.
bwaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaha!! !!
Too funny.
actually not, what do you suppose a 1st world country do with the disabled? let em die because they cant work?? The only difference between you and a quadliplegic is one wrong move like a fall or car accident or something like that. What would you want them to do with you if that happens?? They used to lock the disabled in the attic or mental hospitals or dump them out in the forest to be eaten by the wolves. Should we go back to that?? Suppose you have children and one of your kids has MR/ low functioning autism, are you going to live forever to provide for that child?? Without social programs of any sort, your child will end up in a state institution probably being mistreated and abused.
You are not immune to tragity, no one is.
Our budget problems they like to blame on the SSDI and welfare folks, however they will spend billions of dollars in war, maiming our young people adding them to the rolls of the disabled to be disposed of.
Did you know that alot of severely disabled veterans are put in nursing homes instead of helping them live independantly?
So what is your solution to those who are disabled beyond the ability to work and their families dont have the resources for the level of care that is needed?? ....bring out wolves, or make them crawl the plank into shark infested waters?? Or just die slowly of starvation like they never existed??
I hate this shark v's plankton type of thinking. No one is immune to being disabled.
becides these politians that spew this shark/plankton thinking will never have to worry about such problems, cause once they been elected even one term, they are set for life, them and their families, meanwhile they try to deny the "little people" any help at all.
Our budget was balanced in Clinton's admin. and Bush gave the mega wealthy tax breaks, and 2 wars later, then Obama kissing the @ss of the banks, and other big companies, and 2 more semi-wars only put the cherry on top of our debt.
Meanwhile, the taxpayers will pay for it...and the most vunerable of our society will be left for the economic wolves to eat them.
Jojo
_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I am sick to the kind teeth of people like you comparing me to a leech because nobody will give me a job and don't have the head for business.
This conversation is over.
bwaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaha!! !!
Too funny.
actually not, what do you suppose a 1st world country do with the disabled? let em die because they cant work?? The only difference between you and a quadliplegic is one wrong move like a fall or car accident or something like that. What would you want them to do with you if that happens?? They used to lock the disabled in the attic or mental hospitals or dump them out in the forest to be eaten by the wolves. Should we go back to that?? Suppose you have children and one of your kids has MR/ low functioning autism, are you going to live forever to provide for that child?? Without social programs of any sort, your child will end up in a state institution probably being mistreated and abused.
You are not immune to tragity, no one is.
Our budget problems they like to blame on the SSDI and welfare folks, however they will spend billions of dollars in war, maiming our young people adding them to the rolls of the disabled to be disposed of.
Did you know that alot of severely disabled veterans are put in nursing homes instead of helping them live independantly?
So what is your solution to those who are disabled beyond the ability to work and their families dont have the resources for the level of care that is needed?? ....bring out wolves, or make them crawl the plank into shark infested waters?? Or just die slowly of starvation like they never existed??
I hate this shark v's plankton type of thinking. No one is immune to being disabled.
becides these politians that spew this shark/plankton thinking will never have to worry about such problems, cause once they been elected even one term, they are set for life, them and their families, meanwhile they try to deny the "little people" any help at all.
Our budget was balanced in Clinton's admin. and Bush gave the mega wealthy tax breaks, and 2 wars later, then Obama kissing the @ss of the banks, and other big companies, and 2 more semi-wars only put the cherry on top of our debt.
Meanwhile, the taxpayers will pay for it...and the most vunerable of our society will be left for the economic wolves to eat them.
Jojo
Beat me too it, though I was not going to get that graphic......but yeah it does irritate me that even people on a forum for people with a mental disorder are ok with the idea of basically just leaving those who aren't 'contributing' to the machine to die. What kind of a society just abandons the people who need assistance? a sick one in my opinion....though some like to say the only reason I feel the way I do about these things is because I have difficulties and I have always been what you would call lower class so yeah i got the free/reduced lunches at school and a lot of the food I ate was bought with food stamps, well yes that experiance contributes.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
We were closest to "pure capitalism" in the 19th century, yet people these days have such a short memory. The vast majority of people weren't too happy with that system. Conditions were so bad that labor conflicts frequently lead to disruptive strikes and violence, even to the point of threatening stability. The fact that organized labor persuaded government to regulate labor relations saved the system from becoming the complete dystopia that Marx predicted and ultimately saved capitalism in the 20th century.
Well yes that did slow it down, but once again people are fed up and it does not seem like the government is doing much about it. Which is why I don't see it recovering and think a collapse is probably more or less inevidable.
We were closest to "pure capitalism" in the 19th century, yet people these days have such a short memory. The vast majority of people weren't too happy with that system. Conditions were so bad that labor conflicts frequently lead to disruptive strikes and violence, even to the point of threatening stability. The fact that organized labor persuaded government to regulate labor relations saved the system from becoming the complete dystopia that Marx predicted and ultimately saved capitalism in the 20th century.
Well yes that did slow it down, but once again people are fed up and it does not seem like the government is doing much about it. Which is why I don't see it recovering and think a collapse is probably more or less inevidable.
Well, I think global corporate capitalism is currently in it's "wild west" phase. It's like the gold rush or manifest destiny, i.e. lets conquer the frontier. There's going to have to be some kind of world governmental body to regulate these entities or the world is headed for a huge crisis. Of course a lot of people freak out at the idea of world government. It's going to have to happen sooner or later though.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
We were closest to "pure capitalism" in the 19th century, yet people these days have such a short memory. The vast majority of people weren't too happy with that system. Conditions were so bad that labor conflicts frequently lead to disruptive strikes and violence, even to the point of threatening stability. The fact that organized labor persuaded government to regulate labor relations saved the system from becoming the complete dystopia that Marx predicted and ultimately saved capitalism in the 20th century.
Well yes that did slow it down, but once again people are fed up and it does not seem like the government is doing much about it. Which is why I don't see it recovering and think a collapse is probably more or less inevidable.
Well, I think global corporate capitalism is currently in it's "wild west" phase. It's like the gold rush or manifest destiny, i.e. lets conquer the frontier. There's going to have to be some kind of world governmental body to regulate these entities or the world is headed for a huge crisis. Of course a lot of people freak out at the idea of world government. It's going to have to happen sooner or later though.
Hopefully it's not headed by the United States in any way shape or form........if that is what happens.
To provide for the Common Welfare.
At some time that meant not dying in the streets,
Rome gave out bread.
The Pest House, Poor Farm, Asylum, Orphanage, were hellholes, but still better than dying on the street. Compared to the General Welfare of the time, a place to laydown, one meal a day, was better than dying.
Disposal of the dead on the street was a Public Service, people with no other means could bring out their dead, to be carted away for burial.
The Pest House had an ever open trench grave behind, but the dying were given shelter and food, not just used for fill. Some even recovered.
It kept the Pestilence from spreading.
Orphan children were gathered, fed, clothed, educated, they were at least prepared to start in life on their own at eighteen. They were seen as future workers, worth some investment from the Public Purse.
Such was the meaning of Common Welfare when our country was founded.
A hundred years later the education of poor children was added. Their parents could not afford education, had none, only the educated paid from the Public Purse could teach, and the result was considered worth the expense. Civil War times, less than a quarter could read and write, and most of them badly. Education was marked by being able to sign your name, where most before had made their X.
More than a generation later it got radical, having a job at the mill was no longer an excuse to skip school, which lead to Child Labor Laws, and Mandatory Education.
Public Health got activist, went after the source of disease, mostly through pure water for all.
About this time during the Yellow Fever that struck the Gulf Coast, The whole town of St. Joe Florida died, and in New Orleans, those who showed symptoms, were rolled from bed to coffin, and then from coffin into the mass grave.
Mandatory education was extended, at least to fifteen, where labor laws said they could work in a factory.
In the mass testing of World War II, everyone drafted, the common education level was half way through Eighth Grade with a C-. That is still the standard for the GED.
The three in four that finish high school we take with pride. one in four some University. Public Universities, the Land Grant Colleges, making education available to the many.
Clean water was followed by ending hunger, not just feeding orphans, but seeing that every child had food. It was found to be the main limiting factor in education. Even then many refused Food Stamps, or had income, but did not feed their children. So school lunch programs filled the need and empty bellies.
It all falls under Provide for the Common Welfare.
Seeing to it that children have pure water, food, education, shelter, is the main role of Government. Our goal has always been a better future for the next generation, all of them.
The other function of Government, Defense, the Founding Fathers were against a standing army, but gave Congress the right to fund one, for less than two years. Armies had a police function in Europe, rule of the people for the government, that was forbidden. They would also use up more than half of the funds provided for the less fortunate.
We are there again, more than half spent on a standing army, cuts to the aged, widows and orphans, the ill. No cost of living adjustment for the old, but increases in all Government Departments.
Banks have always been Chartered and Regulated by the State. Savings and Loan were limited to local loans they held to maturity. Deregulated they were looted.
Banks were allowed to sell mortgages to Fanny and Freddie, but not sell scurities based on mortgages. Deregulated they were looted, from the inside, and allowed to buy insurance on mortgages they no longer owned. AIG was the result. the Bailout.
Banks and Brokers are regulated by the government, and granted powers not available to the people. The Federal Reserve, the SEC, they are part of the Government.
The same people work in all industries, being Government employes, elected officals, who cycle through jobs in banks and brokers, and this group is the ones that looted the economy and became very wealthy doing so.
This is not The Capitalist System, just common theft, fraud, from a small group that has bribed and worse their way to power.
This is not the first time this has happened, it always ends badly.
This is what lead to Anti Trust, 90% tax rates, strict regulation of banks and markets, twice in the last hundred years.
The People need to elect a Congress to pass the laws that protect the people, again.
Each generation must water the Tree of Liberty.
We were closest to "pure capitalism" in the 19th century, yet people these days have such a short memory. The vast majority of people weren't too happy with that system. Conditions were so bad that labor conflicts frequently lead to disruptive strikes and violence, even to the point of threatening stability. The fact that organized labor persuaded government to regulate labor relations saved the system from becoming the complete dystopia that Marx predicted and ultimately saved capitalism in the 20th century.
Well yes that did slow it down, but once again people are fed up and it does not seem like the government is doing much about it. Which is why I don't see it recovering and think a collapse is probably more or less inevidable.
Well, I think global corporate capitalism is currently in it's "wild west" phase. It's like the gold rush or manifest destiny, i.e. lets conquer the frontier. There's going to have to be some kind of world governmental body to regulate these entities or the world is headed for a huge crisis. Of course a lot of people freak out at the idea of world government. It's going to have to happen sooner or later though.
That's untrue. That happened during the nineteenth century. THere's nothing wild west about this. This is just a choking brace put around the USA's neck this sort of clique.
jojobean
Veteran
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk
I am sick to the kind teeth of people like you comparing me to a leech because nobody will give me a job and don't have the head for business.
This conversation is over.
bwaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaha!! !!
Too funny.
actually not, what do you suppose a 1st world country do with the disabled? let em die because they cant work?? The only difference between you and a quadliplegic is one wrong move like a fall or car accident or something like that. What would you want them to do with you if that happens?? They used to lock the disabled in the attic or mental hospitals or dump them out in the forest to be eaten by the wolves. Should we go back to that?? Suppose you have children and one of your kids has MR/ low functioning autism, are you going to live forever to provide for that child?? Without social programs of any sort, your child will end up in a state institution probably being mistreated and abused.
You are not immune to tragity, no one is.
Our budget problems they like to blame on the SSDI and welfare folks, however they will spend billions of dollars in war, maiming our young people adding them to the rolls of the disabled to be disposed of.
Did you know that alot of severely disabled veterans are put in nursing homes instead of helping them live independantly?
So what is your solution to those who are disabled beyond the ability to work and their families dont have the resources for the level of care that is needed?? ....bring out wolves, or make them crawl the plank into shark infested waters?? Or just die slowly of starvation like they never existed??
I hate this shark v's plankton type of thinking. No one is immune to being disabled.
becides these politians that spew this shark/plankton thinking will never have to worry about such problems, cause once they been elected even one term, they are set for life, them and their families, meanwhile they try to deny the "little people" any help at all.
Our budget was balanced in Clinton's admin. and Bush gave the mega wealthy tax breaks, and 2 wars later, then Obama kissing the @ss of the banks, and other big companies, and 2 more semi-wars only put the cherry on top of our debt.
Meanwhile, the taxpayers will pay for it...and the most vunerable of our society will be left for the economic wolves to eat them.
Jojo
Beat me too it, though I was not going to get that graphic......but yeah it does irritate me that even people on a forum for people with a mental disorder are ok with the idea of basically just leaving those who aren't 'contributing' to the machine to die. What kind of a society just abandons the people who need assistance? a sick one in my opinion....though some like to say the only reason I feel the way I do about these things is because I have difficulties and I have always been what you would call lower class so yeah i got the free/reduced lunches at school and a lot of the food I ate was bought with food stamps, well yes that experiance contributes.
I agree. It totally baffles me that a forum for people with disabilities has such a large population of folks that believe in the economic wolf cure. Just let them die like a whisper in the night while those who are higher functioning campian against any and all autism cures. I mean it is really creepy at some level.
Its like saying if a person is not high functioning enough where autism is more of a curse than a gift, then they are an oxygen thief.
Jojo
_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin
Last edited by jojobean on 16 Nov 2011, 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jojobean
Veteran
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk
At some time that meant not dying in the streets,
Rome gave out bread.
The Pest House, Poor Farm, Asylum, Orphanage, were hellholes, but still better than dying on the street. Compared to the General Welfare of the time, a place to laydown, one meal a day, was better than dying.
Disposal of the dead on the street was a Public Service, people with no other means could bring out their dead, to be carted away for burial.
The Pest House had an ever open trench grave behind, but the dying were given shelter and food, not just used for fill. Some even recovered.
It kept the Pestilence from spreading.
Orphan children were gathered, fed, clothed, educated, they were at least prepared to start in life on their own at eighteen. They were seen as future workers, worth some investment from the Public Purse.
Such was the meaning of Common Welfare when our country was founded.
A hundred years later the education of poor children was added. Their parents could not afford education, had none, only the educated paid from the Public Purse could teach, and the result was considered worth the expense. Civil War times, less than a quarter could read and write, and most of them badly. Education was marked by being able to sign your name, where most before had made their X.
More than a generation later it got radical, having a job at the mill was no longer an excuse to skip school, which lead to Child Labor Laws, and Mandatory Education.
Public Health got activist, went after the source of disease, mostly through pure water for all.
About this time during the Yellow Fever that struck the Gulf Coast, The whole town of St. Joe Florida died, and in New Orleans, those who showed symptoms, were rolled from bed to coffin, and then from coffin into the mass grave.
Mandatory education was extended, at least to fifteen, where labor laws said they could work in a factory.
In the mass testing of World War II, everyone drafted, the common education level was half way through Eighth Grade with a C-. That is still the standard for the GED.
The three in four that finish high school we take with pride. one in four some University. Public Universities, the Land Grant Colleges, making education available to the many.
Clean water was followed by ending hunger, not just feeding orphans, but seeing that every child had food. It was found to be the main limiting factor in education. Even then many refused Food Stamps, or had income, but did not feed their children. So school lunch programs filled the need and empty bellies.
It all falls under Provide for the Common Welfare.
Seeing to it that children have pure water, food, education, shelter, is the main role of Government. Our goal has always been a better future for the next generation, all of them.
The other function of Government, Defense, the Founding Fathers were against a standing army, but gave Congress the right to fund one, for less than two years. Armies had a police function in Europe, rule of the people for the government, that was forbidden. They would also use up more than half of the funds provided for the less fortunate.
We are there again, more than half spent on a standing army, cuts to the aged, widows and orphans, the ill. No cost of living adjustment for the old, but increases in all Government Departments.
Banks have always been Chartered and Regulated by the State. Savings and Loan were limited to local loans they held to maturity. Deregulated they were looted.
Banks were allowed to sell mortgages to Fanny and Freddie, but not sell scurities based on mortgages. Deregulated they were looted, from the inside, and allowed to buy insurance on mortgages they no longer owned. AIG was the result. the Bailout.
Banks and Brokers are regulated by the government, and granted powers not available to the people. The Federal Reserve, the SEC, they are part of the Government.
The same people work in all industries, being Government employes, elected officals, who cycle through jobs in banks and brokers, and this group is the ones that looted the economy and became very wealthy doing so.
This is not The Capitalist System, just common theft, fraud, from a small group that has bribed and worse their way to power.
This is not the first time this has happened, it always ends badly.
This is what lead to Anti Trust, 90% tax rates, strict regulation of banks and markets, twice in the last hundred years.
The People need to elect a Congress to pass the laws that protect the people, again.
Each generation must water the Tree of Liberty.
good post....however, I think we are done in this time. We had a chance before to clean things up when the government had money,this time...uncle sam has been evicted when the government went into forclosure. All is left is crooks, sneaks, and prostitutes guarding the hen house.
a decade of 2 wars and billionares legally evading taxes comes with a hefty price tag....it costs us that tree of liberty.
Jojo
_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin
It is a tree that grows best when the manure is the deepest.
Practical, electing just fifty people to Washington from the Nancy Regan Party, Just Say NO! It is enough to block either party from doing anything.
The Government never did have any money. The Clinton surplus that is mentioned was $22.15 left in the desk in the Oval Office, and $7 Trillion in national debt. Most of that was the Social Security Trust Fund, that was looted. That was owed to the war babies in a decade.
Now it is $14 Trillion, but they could not pay at $7.
The Federal Reserve also printed $16 Trillion in our name and gave it to banks and brokers. Call that loan, they are all bankrupt, We The People own them. Only a National Banking system is going to clear up that mess.
The problem is government income. They are in debt for five years income. They spend more than income, they need a second job.
Mortgages and banks are hopeless, and we are paying for them, just take them over and cut mortgages principal and interest. Bankers deserve what Real Estate Agents got, Food Stamps. Not even Goldman Sachs can make money. 90+% of all stock is owned by institutional investors, retirement programs. The workers own the stock market, the companies.
The only thing to cut is banks, brokers, and government.
The People still own their money in the bank, their stocks, but that is a computer program now. Paypal does better.
The big issue is explaining to the war babies how they are going to get their Social Security. Saying you lost it is going to involve rope. The oldest hit 65 this year.
So we only need to come up with the Gross National Product, twice, once to cover the Federal Reserve loans, which nationalizing the banks would do, the other could be raised from income tax.
We need $14 Trillion, 14,000 billion, over the next twenty years. Taxes have to go up $2 Trillion a year.
Since a top tax rate of 35% brings in $3.5 trillion, that has to go to 55%. That is still historically low, 60% was normal, 90% during times of war, and we are at war. The tax rate has to be high enough that we do not borrow at interest. 90% then declining as the debt is paid down.
That still leaves an inequality of income problem, which could best be solved by a one time tax on assets above $100 Million, of 25%. Consider it a claw back of ill gotten gains. Those who object can also get jail time.
There is no offshore in a global economy, all assets, anywhere, are subject to tax.
This puts us back to an Ike to Nixon tax rate. A Real Radical solution.
The Government fears making weed legal, because of what they think when they hear the word Hemp.
